黑色素瘤和痣的人口统计学、形态学和组织病理学特征:来自统计分析和机器学习模型的见解。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Blagjica Lazarova, Gordana Petrushevska, Zdenka Stojanovska, Stephen C Mullins
{"title":"黑色素瘤和痣的人口统计学、形态学和组织病理学特征:来自统计分析和机器学习模型的见解。","authors":"Blagjica Lazarova, Gordana Petrushevska, Zdenka Stojanovska, Stephen C Mullins","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192499","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early and accurate differentiation between melanomas and benign nevi is essential for making proper clinical decisions. This study aimed to identify clinical, morphological, and histopathological variables most strongly associated with melanoma, using both statistical and machine learning approaches. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluated 184 melanocytic lesions using clinical, morphological, and histopathological parameters. Univariable analyses were performed in XLStat statistical software, version 2014.5.03, while multivariable machine learning models were developed in Jamovi (version 2.4). Five supervised algorithms (random forest, partial least squares, elastic net regression, conditional inference trees, and k-nearest neighbors) were compared using repeated cross-validation, with performance evaluated by accuracy, Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and calibration. <b>Results</b>: Univariable analysis identified significant differences between melanomas and nevi in age, horizontal diameter, gender, lesion location, and selected histopathological features (cytological and extracellular matrix changes, epidermal interactions). However, several associations weakened in multivariable analysis due to collinearity and overlapping effects. Using glmnet, the most influential independent predictors were cytological changes, horizontal diameter, epidermal interactions, and extracellular matrix features, alongside age, gender, and lesion location. The model achieved high discrimination (AUC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and accuracy (training: 95.3%; test: 92.6%), confirming robustness. <b>Conclusions</b>: Structured demographic, morphological, and histopathological data-particularly age, lesion size, cytological and extracellular matrix changes, and epidermal interactions-can effectively support classification of melanocytic lesions. Machine learning approaches (the glmnet model in our study) provide a reliable framework to evaluate such predictors and offer practical diagnostic support in dermatopathology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Demographic, Morphological, and Histopathological Characteristics of Melanoma and Nevi: Insights from Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Models.\",\"authors\":\"Blagjica Lazarova, Gordana Petrushevska, Zdenka Stojanovska, Stephen C Mullins\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15192499\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early and accurate differentiation between melanomas and benign nevi is essential for making proper clinical decisions. This study aimed to identify clinical, morphological, and histopathological variables most strongly associated with melanoma, using both statistical and machine learning approaches. <b>Methods</b>: This study evaluated 184 melanocytic lesions using clinical, morphological, and histopathological parameters. Univariable analyses were performed in XLStat statistical software, version 2014.5.03, while multivariable machine learning models were developed in Jamovi (version 2.4). Five supervised algorithms (random forest, partial least squares, elastic net regression, conditional inference trees, and k-nearest neighbors) were compared using repeated cross-validation, with performance evaluated by accuracy, Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and calibration. <b>Results</b>: Univariable analysis identified significant differences between melanomas and nevi in age, horizontal diameter, gender, lesion location, and selected histopathological features (cytological and extracellular matrix changes, epidermal interactions). However, several associations weakened in multivariable analysis due to collinearity and overlapping effects. Using glmnet, the most influential independent predictors were cytological changes, horizontal diameter, epidermal interactions, and extracellular matrix features, alongside age, gender, and lesion location. The model achieved high discrimination (AUC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and accuracy (training: 95.3%; test: 92.6%), confirming robustness. <b>Conclusions</b>: Structured demographic, morphological, and histopathological data-particularly age, lesion size, cytological and extracellular matrix changes, and epidermal interactions-can effectively support classification of melanocytic lesions. Machine learning approaches (the glmnet model in our study) provide a reliable framework to evaluate such predictors and offer practical diagnostic support in dermatopathology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192499\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192499","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:黑素瘤与良性痣的早期准确鉴别对于做出正确的临床决策至关重要。本研究旨在利用统计学和机器学习方法,确定与黑色素瘤最密切相关的临床、形态学和组织病理学变量。方法:本研究利用临床、形态学和组织病理学参数对184例黑素细胞病变进行评估。单变量分析在XLStat统计软件2014.5.03中进行,多变量机器学习模型在Jamovi(2.4版本)中开发。五种监督算法(随机森林、偏最小二乘、弹性网络回归、条件推理树和k近邻)使用重复交叉验证进行比较,并通过准确性、Kappa、灵敏度、特异性、F1评分和校准来评估性能。结果:单变量分析发现,黑素瘤和痣在年龄、水平直径、性别、病变位置和某些组织病理学特征(细胞学和细胞外基质改变、表皮相互作用)方面存在显著差异。然而,在多变量分析中,由于共线性和重叠效应,一些关联减弱。使用glmnet,最具影响力的独立预测因子是细胞学变化、水平直径、表皮相互作用和细胞外基质特征,以及年龄、性别和病变位置。该模型具有较高的判别性(AUC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99)和准确性(训练:95.3%,检验:92.6%),证实了鲁棒性。结论:结构化的人口统计学、形态学和组织病理学数据——特别是年龄、病变大小、细胞学和细胞外基质变化以及表皮相互作用——可以有效地支持黑色素细胞病变的分类。机器学习方法(我们研究中的glmnet模型)提供了一个可靠的框架来评估这些预测因子,并在皮肤病理学中提供实用的诊断支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Demographic, Morphological, and Histopathological Characteristics of Melanoma and Nevi: Insights from Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Models.

Demographic, Morphological, and Histopathological Characteristics of Melanoma and Nevi: Insights from Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Models.

Demographic, Morphological, and Histopathological Characteristics of Melanoma and Nevi: Insights from Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Models.

Demographic, Morphological, and Histopathological Characteristics of Melanoma and Nevi: Insights from Statistical Analysis and Machine Learning Models.

Background: Early and accurate differentiation between melanomas and benign nevi is essential for making proper clinical decisions. This study aimed to identify clinical, morphological, and histopathological variables most strongly associated with melanoma, using both statistical and machine learning approaches. Methods: This study evaluated 184 melanocytic lesions using clinical, morphological, and histopathological parameters. Univariable analyses were performed in XLStat statistical software, version 2014.5.03, while multivariable machine learning models were developed in Jamovi (version 2.4). Five supervised algorithms (random forest, partial least squares, elastic net regression, conditional inference trees, and k-nearest neighbors) were compared using repeated cross-validation, with performance evaluated by accuracy, Kappa, sensitivity, specificity, F1 score, and calibration. Results: Univariable analysis identified significant differences between melanomas and nevi in age, horizontal diameter, gender, lesion location, and selected histopathological features (cytological and extracellular matrix changes, epidermal interactions). However, several associations weakened in multivariable analysis due to collinearity and overlapping effects. Using glmnet, the most influential independent predictors were cytological changes, horizontal diameter, epidermal interactions, and extracellular matrix features, alongside age, gender, and lesion location. The model achieved high discrimination (AUC = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.93-0.99) and accuracy (training: 95.3%; test: 92.6%), confirming robustness. Conclusions: Structured demographic, morphological, and histopathological data-particularly age, lesion size, cytological and extracellular matrix changes, and epidermal interactions-can effectively support classification of melanocytic lesions. Machine learning approaches (the glmnet model in our study) provide a reliable framework to evaluate such predictors and offer practical diagnostic support in dermatopathology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信