优化多模态图像配准技术:PET/CT集成非刚性和仿射方法的综合研究。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Babar Ali, Mansour M Alqahtani, Essam M Alkhybari, Ali H D Alshehri, Mohammad Sayed, Tamoor Ali
{"title":"优化多模态图像配准技术:PET/CT集成非刚性和仿射方法的综合研究。","authors":"Babar Ali, Mansour M Alqahtani, Essam M Alkhybari, Ali H D Alshehri, Mohammad Sayed, Tamoor Ali","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objective</b>: Multimodal image registration plays a critical role in modern medical imaging, enabling the integration of complementary modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). This study compares the performance of three widely used image registration techniques-Demons Image Registration with Modality Transformation, Free-Form Deformation using the Medical Image Registration Toolbox (MIRT), and MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration-in terms of improving PET/CT image alignment. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 100 matched PET/CT image slices from a clinical scanner were analysed. Preprocessing techniques, including histogram equalisation and contrast enhancement (via imadjust and adapthisteq), were applied to minimise intensity discrepancies. Each registration method was evaluated under varying parameter conditions with regard to sigma fluid (range 4-8), histogram bins (100 to 256), and interpolation methods (linear and cubic). Performance was assessed using quantitative metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and standard deviation (STD). <b>Results</b>: Demons registration achieved optimal performance at a sigma fluid value of 6, with an RMSE of 0.1529, and demonstrated superior computational efficiency. The MIRT showed better adaptability to complex anatomical deformations, with an RMSE of 0.1725. MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration, when combined with contrast enhancement, yielded the highest accuracy (RMSE = 0.1317 at alpha = 6). Preprocessing improved registration accuracy, reducing the RMSE by up to 16%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Each registration technique has distinct advantages: the Demons algorithm is ideal for time-sensitive tasks, the MIRT is suited to precision-driven applications, and MATLAB-based methods offer flexible processing for large datasets. This study provides a foundational framework for optimising PET/CT image registration in both research and clinical environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524259/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimising Multimodal Image Registration Techniques: A Comprehensive Study of Non-Rigid and Affine Methods for PET/CT Integration.\",\"authors\":\"Babar Ali, Mansour M Alqahtani, Essam M Alkhybari, Ali H D Alshehri, Mohammad Sayed, Tamoor Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15192484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objective</b>: Multimodal image registration plays a critical role in modern medical imaging, enabling the integration of complementary modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). This study compares the performance of three widely used image registration techniques-Demons Image Registration with Modality Transformation, Free-Form Deformation using the Medical Image Registration Toolbox (MIRT), and MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration-in terms of improving PET/CT image alignment. <b>Methods</b>: A total of 100 matched PET/CT image slices from a clinical scanner were analysed. Preprocessing techniques, including histogram equalisation and contrast enhancement (via imadjust and adapthisteq), were applied to minimise intensity discrepancies. Each registration method was evaluated under varying parameter conditions with regard to sigma fluid (range 4-8), histogram bins (100 to 256), and interpolation methods (linear and cubic). Performance was assessed using quantitative metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and standard deviation (STD). <b>Results</b>: Demons registration achieved optimal performance at a sigma fluid value of 6, with an RMSE of 0.1529, and demonstrated superior computational efficiency. The MIRT showed better adaptability to complex anatomical deformations, with an RMSE of 0.1725. MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration, when combined with contrast enhancement, yielded the highest accuracy (RMSE = 0.1317 at alpha = 6). Preprocessing improved registration accuracy, reducing the RMSE by up to 16%. <b>Conclusions</b>: Each registration technique has distinct advantages: the Demons algorithm is ideal for time-sensitive tasks, the MIRT is suited to precision-driven applications, and MATLAB-based methods offer flexible processing for large datasets. This study provides a foundational framework for optimising PET/CT image registration in both research and clinical environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12524259/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:多模态图像配准在现代医学成像中起着至关重要的作用,它使正电子发射断层扫描(PET)和计算机断层扫描(CT)等互补模式得以整合。本研究比较了三种广泛使用的图像配准技术——使用模态变换的恶魔图像配准、使用医学图像配准工具箱(MIRT)的自由形式变形和MATLAB基于强度的配准——在改善PET/CT图像对齐方面的性能。方法:对临床扫描得到的100张匹配的PET/CT图像切片进行分析。预处理技术,包括直方图均衡化和对比度增强(通过imadjust和adapthisteq),被应用于最小化强度差异。每种配准方法在sigma流体(范围4-8)、直方图箱(100至256)和插值方法(线性和三次)的不同参数条件下进行评估。使用定量指标评估性能:均方根误差(RMSE)、均方误差(MSE)、平均绝对误差(MAE)、Pearson相关系数(PCC)和标准差(STD)。结果:在sigma流体值为6时,Demons配准达到最佳性能,RMSE为0.1529,显示出优越的计算效率。MIRT对复杂解剖变形具有较好的适应性,RMSE为0.1725。当结合对比度增强时,MATLAB基于强度的配准产生了最高的精度(在alpha = 6时RMSE = 0.1317)。预处理提高了配准精度,将RMSE降低了16%。结论:每种配准技术都有其独特的优势:Demons算法适用于时间敏感型任务,MIRT适用于精度驱动型应用,基于matlab的方法可灵活处理大型数据集。本研究为在研究和临床环境中优化PET/CT图像配准提供了一个基础框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Optimising Multimodal Image Registration Techniques: A Comprehensive Study of Non-Rigid and Affine Methods for PET/CT Integration.

Optimising Multimodal Image Registration Techniques: A Comprehensive Study of Non-Rigid and Affine Methods for PET/CT Integration.

Optimising Multimodal Image Registration Techniques: A Comprehensive Study of Non-Rigid and Affine Methods for PET/CT Integration.

Optimising Multimodal Image Registration Techniques: A Comprehensive Study of Non-Rigid and Affine Methods for PET/CT Integration.

Background/Objective: Multimodal image registration plays a critical role in modern medical imaging, enabling the integration of complementary modalities such as positron emission tomography (PET) and computed tomography (CT). This study compares the performance of three widely used image registration techniques-Demons Image Registration with Modality Transformation, Free-Form Deformation using the Medical Image Registration Toolbox (MIRT), and MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration-in terms of improving PET/CT image alignment. Methods: A total of 100 matched PET/CT image slices from a clinical scanner were analysed. Preprocessing techniques, including histogram equalisation and contrast enhancement (via imadjust and adapthisteq), were applied to minimise intensity discrepancies. Each registration method was evaluated under varying parameter conditions with regard to sigma fluid (range 4-8), histogram bins (100 to 256), and interpolation methods (linear and cubic). Performance was assessed using quantitative metrics: root mean square error (RMSE), mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC), and standard deviation (STD). Results: Demons registration achieved optimal performance at a sigma fluid value of 6, with an RMSE of 0.1529, and demonstrated superior computational efficiency. The MIRT showed better adaptability to complex anatomical deformations, with an RMSE of 0.1725. MATLAB Intensity-Based Registration, when combined with contrast enhancement, yielded the highest accuracy (RMSE = 0.1317 at alpha = 6). Preprocessing improved registration accuracy, reducing the RMSE by up to 16%. Conclusions: Each registration technique has distinct advantages: the Demons algorithm is ideal for time-sensitive tasks, the MIRT is suited to precision-driven applications, and MATLAB-based methods offer flexible processing for large datasets. This study provides a foundational framework for optimising PET/CT image registration in both research and clinical environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信