机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中机械与限制性运动对齐:一项随机对照试验。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Alexey V Lychagin, Andrey A Gritsyuk, Mikhail P Elizarov, Andrey A Gritsuk, Maxim Y Gavlovsky, Konstantin K Tomboidi, Eugene B Kalinsky, Nahum Rosenberg
{"title":"机器人辅助全膝关节置换术中机械与限制性运动对齐:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Alexey V Lychagin, Andrey A Gritsyuk, Mikhail P Elizarov, Andrey A Gritsuk, Maxim Y Gavlovsky, Konstantin K Tomboidi, Eugene B Kalinsky, Nahum Rosenberg","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Lower limb malalignment is a hallmark of knee osteoarthritis, with surgical correction techniques evolving from traditional mechanical alignment (MA) to kinematic alignment (KA) approaches. Restrictive kinematic alignment (rKA) represents a hybrid strategy combining principles from both techniques. This study evaluated short-term functional outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RoTKA), comparing MA versus rKA alignment strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective, randomized, single-center study enrolled 96 patients with grade 3-4 idiopathic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence classification). Patients were randomized to MA (<i>n</i> = 49, mean age 67 ± 9 years) or rKA (<i>n</i> = 47, mean age 66 ± 7 years) groups. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles were 172.6° ± 1.1° and 172.9° ± 0.9° for MA and rKA groups, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (primary outcome), SF-36, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). <b>Results</b>: Postoperative HKA angles were 179.5° ± 1.2° (MA) and 176.0° ± 1.5° (rKA). At 14 days postoperatively, knee ROM increased by 20.5% in the MA group and 25.7% in the rKA group, with a statistically significant 5.2% intergroup difference, indicating faster postoperative recovery (<i>p</i> = 0.008). VAS pain scores decreased by 7% in the rKA group while increasing by 13% in the MA group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At one-year follow-up, FJS-12 scores were significantly higher in the rKA group (94.8 ± 3.2 vs. 91.9 ± 2.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in KSS, OKS, or SF-36 score between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Restrictive kinematic alignment demonstrated superior early postoperative outcomes compared to mechanical alignment in RoTKA, with significantly reduced pain and improved ROM. While one-year functional outcomes were comparable between techniques, rKA may offer advantages in the immediate postoperative period, supporting its consideration as a viable alignment strategy in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523575/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanical Versus Restrictive Kinematic Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Alexey V Lychagin, Andrey A Gritsyuk, Mikhail P Elizarov, Andrey A Gritsuk, Maxim Y Gavlovsky, Konstantin K Tomboidi, Eugene B Kalinsky, Nahum Rosenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15192524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Lower limb malalignment is a hallmark of knee osteoarthritis, with surgical correction techniques evolving from traditional mechanical alignment (MA) to kinematic alignment (KA) approaches. Restrictive kinematic alignment (rKA) represents a hybrid strategy combining principles from both techniques. This study evaluated short-term functional outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RoTKA), comparing MA versus rKA alignment strategies. <b>Methods</b>: This prospective, randomized, single-center study enrolled 96 patients with grade 3-4 idiopathic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence classification). Patients were randomized to MA (<i>n</i> = 49, mean age 67 ± 9 years) or rKA (<i>n</i> = 47, mean age 66 ± 7 years) groups. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles were 172.6° ± 1.1° and 172.9° ± 0.9° for MA and rKA groups, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (primary outcome), SF-36, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). <b>Results</b>: Postoperative HKA angles were 179.5° ± 1.2° (MA) and 176.0° ± 1.5° (rKA). At 14 days postoperatively, knee ROM increased by 20.5% in the MA group and 25.7% in the rKA group, with a statistically significant 5.2% intergroup difference, indicating faster postoperative recovery (<i>p</i> = 0.008). VAS pain scores decreased by 7% in the rKA group while increasing by 13% in the MA group (<i>p</i> < 0.001). At one-year follow-up, FJS-12 scores were significantly higher in the rKA group (94.8 ± 3.2 vs. 91.9 ± 2.2, <i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in KSS, OKS, or SF-36 score between groups. <b>Conclusions</b>: Restrictive kinematic alignment demonstrated superior early postoperative outcomes compared to mechanical alignment in RoTKA, with significantly reduced pain and improved ROM. While one-year functional outcomes were comparable between techniques, rKA may offer advantages in the immediate postoperative period, supporting its consideration as a viable alignment strategy in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523575/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:下肢错位是膝关节骨关节炎的一个标志,手术矫正技术从传统的机械对齐(MA)发展到运动学对齐(KA)方法。约束运动学对齐(rKA)是一种结合了这两种技术原理的混合策略。本研究评估了机器人辅助全膝关节置换术(RoTKA)后的短期功能结果,比较了MA和rKA对齐策略。方法:这项前瞻性、随机、单中心研究纳入96例3-4级特发性膝骨关节炎(kelgren - lawrence分级)患者。患者随机分为MA组(n = 49,平均年龄67±9岁)和rKA组(n = 47,平均年龄66±7岁)。MA组和rKA组术前髋关节-膝关节-踝关节(HKA)角度分别为172.6°±1.1°和172.9°±0.9°。结果采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分、活动范围(ROM)、膝关节社会评分(KSS)、牛津膝关节评分(OKS)(主要结果)、SF-36和遗忘关节评分(FJS-12)进行评估。结果:术后HKA角度分别为179.5°±1.2°(MA)和176.0°±1.5°(rKA)。术后14天,MA组膝关节ROM增加20.5%,rKA组膝关节ROM增加25.7%,组间差异有统计学意义(5.2%),术后恢复较快(p = 0.008)。rKA组VAS疼痛评分下降7%,MA组升高13% (p < 0.001)。随访1年时,rKA组FJS-12评分显著高于rKA组(94.8±3.2比91.9±2.2,p < 0.001)。两组间KSS、OKS或SF-36评分无显著差异。结论:与RoTKA的机械对齐相比,限制性运动学对齐显示出更好的术后早期效果,可以显著减少疼痛和改善ROM。尽管两种技术的一年功能结果相当,但rKA可能在术后立即提供优势,支持其作为机器人辅助膝关节置换术中可行的对齐策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mechanical Versus Restrictive Kinematic Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mechanical Versus Restrictive Kinematic Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mechanical Versus Restrictive Kinematic Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Mechanical Versus Restrictive Kinematic Alignment in Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Lower limb malalignment is a hallmark of knee osteoarthritis, with surgical correction techniques evolving from traditional mechanical alignment (MA) to kinematic alignment (KA) approaches. Restrictive kinematic alignment (rKA) represents a hybrid strategy combining principles from both techniques. This study evaluated short-term functional outcomes following robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RoTKA), comparing MA versus rKA alignment strategies. Methods: This prospective, randomized, single-center study enrolled 96 patients with grade 3-4 idiopathic knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence classification). Patients were randomized to MA (n = 49, mean age 67 ± 9 years) or rKA (n = 47, mean age 66 ± 7 years) groups. Preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angles were 172.6° ± 1.1° and 172.9° ± 0.9° for MA and rKA groups, respectively. Outcomes were assessed using Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain scores, range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (primary outcome), SF-36, and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS-12). Results: Postoperative HKA angles were 179.5° ± 1.2° (MA) and 176.0° ± 1.5° (rKA). At 14 days postoperatively, knee ROM increased by 20.5% in the MA group and 25.7% in the rKA group, with a statistically significant 5.2% intergroup difference, indicating faster postoperative recovery (p = 0.008). VAS pain scores decreased by 7% in the rKA group while increasing by 13% in the MA group (p < 0.001). At one-year follow-up, FJS-12 scores were significantly higher in the rKA group (94.8 ± 3.2 vs. 91.9 ± 2.2, p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in KSS, OKS, or SF-36 score between groups. Conclusions: Restrictive kinematic alignment demonstrated superior early postoperative outcomes compared to mechanical alignment in RoTKA, with significantly reduced pain and improved ROM. While one-year functional outcomes were comparable between techniques, rKA may offer advantages in the immediate postoperative period, supporting its consideration as a viable alignment strategy in robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信