{"title":"说服过程中社会影响的神经关联:谈判的超扫描脑电图研究。","authors":"Flavia Ciminaghi, Katia Rovelli, Carlotta Acconito, Michela Balconi","doi":"10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Group decision-making requires integrating different perspectives through persuasion, which involves unidirectional social influence, and negotiation, which is a reciprocal interaction based on cooperation and competition. While neuroscientific research has focused on identifying brain activations associated with these processes and their influencing factors, the impact of a prior persuasive dynamic on a subsequent negotiation task remains unexplored. This study examines whether engaging in a persuasive task, in which one individual has a role of social influence, affects neural activity during a subsequent negotiation. Using a hyperscanning paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were analyzed in frontal, temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions in a sample of 26 participants. Results highlight distinct brain activation patterns between former persuaders and former receivers, with increased left-hemisphere delta activity and frontal theta and alpha activation in persuaders, while former receivers exhibited higher beta activity in the right parieto-occipital regions in the final stage of negotiation and higher gamma activity in right-lateralized regions. Overall, the study suggests that prior persuasive interactions shape subsequent negotiation at a neural level, influencing emotional, cognitive, and strategic engagement, with potential implications for understanding social dynamics in group interactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10500,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","volume":"19 1","pages":"165"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518194/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Neural correlates of social influence in persuasion process: a hyperscanning EEG study on negotiation.\",\"authors\":\"Flavia Ciminaghi, Katia Rovelli, Carlotta Acconito, Michela Balconi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Group decision-making requires integrating different perspectives through persuasion, which involves unidirectional social influence, and negotiation, which is a reciprocal interaction based on cooperation and competition. While neuroscientific research has focused on identifying brain activations associated with these processes and their influencing factors, the impact of a prior persuasive dynamic on a subsequent negotiation task remains unexplored. This study examines whether engaging in a persuasive task, in which one individual has a role of social influence, affects neural activity during a subsequent negotiation. Using a hyperscanning paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were analyzed in frontal, temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions in a sample of 26 participants. Results highlight distinct brain activation patterns between former persuaders and former receivers, with increased left-hemisphere delta activity and frontal theta and alpha activation in persuaders, while former receivers exhibited higher beta activity in the right parieto-occipital regions in the final stage of negotiation and higher gamma activity in right-lateralized regions. Overall, the study suggests that prior persuasive interactions shape subsequent negotiation at a neural level, influencing emotional, cognitive, and strategic engagement, with potential implications for understanding social dynamics in group interactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518194/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neurodynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neurodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-025-10353-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Neural correlates of social influence in persuasion process: a hyperscanning EEG study on negotiation.
Group decision-making requires integrating different perspectives through persuasion, which involves unidirectional social influence, and negotiation, which is a reciprocal interaction based on cooperation and competition. While neuroscientific research has focused on identifying brain activations associated with these processes and their influencing factors, the impact of a prior persuasive dynamic on a subsequent negotiation task remains unexplored. This study examines whether engaging in a persuasive task, in which one individual has a role of social influence, affects neural activity during a subsequent negotiation. Using a hyperscanning paradigm with electroencephalography (EEG), frequency bands (delta, theta, alpha, beta and gamma) were analyzed in frontal, temporo-central and parieto-occipital regions in a sample of 26 participants. Results highlight distinct brain activation patterns between former persuaders and former receivers, with increased left-hemisphere delta activity and frontal theta and alpha activation in persuaders, while former receivers exhibited higher beta activity in the right parieto-occipital regions in the final stage of negotiation and higher gamma activity in right-lateralized regions. Overall, the study suggests that prior persuasive interactions shape subsequent negotiation at a neural level, influencing emotional, cognitive, and strategic engagement, with potential implications for understanding social dynamics in group interactions.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive Neurodynamics provides a unique forum of communication and cooperation for scientists and engineers working in the field of cognitive neurodynamics, intelligent science and applications, bridging the gap between theory and application, without any preference for pure theoretical, experimental or computational models.
The emphasis is to publish original models of cognitive neurodynamics, novel computational theories and experimental results. In particular, intelligent science inspired by cognitive neuroscience and neurodynamics is also very welcome.
The scope of Cognitive Neurodynamics covers cognitive neuroscience, neural computation based on dynamics, computer science, intelligent science as well as their interdisciplinary applications in the natural and engineering sciences. Papers that are appropriate for non-specialist readers are encouraged.
1. There is no page limit for manuscripts submitted to Cognitive Neurodynamics. Research papers should clearly represent an important advance of especially broad interest to researchers and technologists in neuroscience, biophysics, BCI, neural computer and intelligent robotics.
2. Cognitive Neurodynamics also welcomes brief communications: short papers reporting results that are of genuinely broad interest but that for one reason and another do not make a sufficiently complete story to justify a full article publication. Brief Communications should consist of approximately four manuscript pages.
3. Cognitive Neurodynamics publishes review articles in which a specific field is reviewed through an exhaustive literature survey. There are no restrictions on the number of pages. Review articles are usually invited, but submitted reviews will also be considered.