去年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心房颤动和冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血栓治疗管理

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Sebastian König, Sven Hohenstein, Johannes Leiner, Anne Nitsche, Alexander Staudt, Frank Steinborn, Christian Bietau, Henning T. Baberg, Michael Niehaus, Jürgen Tebbenjohanns, Melchior Seyfarth, Markus W. Ferrari, Marc M. Vorpahl, Ralf Kuhlen, Kerstin Bode, Andreas Bollmann
{"title":"去年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗并发心房颤动和冠状动脉疾病患者的抗血栓治疗管理","authors":"Sebastian König,&nbsp;Sven Hohenstein,&nbsp;Johannes Leiner,&nbsp;Anne Nitsche,&nbsp;Alexander Staudt,&nbsp;Frank Steinborn,&nbsp;Christian Bietau,&nbsp;Henning T. Baberg,&nbsp;Michael Niehaus,&nbsp;Jürgen Tebbenjohanns,&nbsp;Melchior Seyfarth,&nbsp;Markus W. Ferrari,&nbsp;Marc M. Vorpahl,&nbsp;Ralf Kuhlen,&nbsp;Kerstin Bode,&nbsp;Andreas Bollmann","doi":"10.1002/clc.70196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and optimal antithrombotic medication improves clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. The aim of our study was to describe antithrombotic drug regimens in different patient cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We investigated data from the prospective Helios Heart registry (H2) and the Heart Center Leipzig routine clinical database (HZL). We included inpatient cases with AF and CAD (hospitalized from March 2021 to July 2024 [H2] or January 2017 to December 2021 [HZL]), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the last 12 months. Information on clinical characteristics, coronary interventions, and medication prescribed was obtained from electronic case report forms and/or administrative data based on ICD-10, OPS, and ATC codes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 3481 (HZL), and 205 (H2) index cases with comparable baseline characteristics. Overall, 92.5% (HZL) and 87.6% (H2) of patients were on any anticoagulation, and 93.0% (HZL) and 80.2% (H2) were prescribed ≥ 1 antiplatelet agent. There were relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy when stratifying for PCI timing. Factors associated with higher (older age) or lower (comorbidity burden, antiplatelet treatment, prior left atrial appendage occlusion) prescription rates of OAC were identified. OAC therapy without adjunctive antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased rate of rehospitalization for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months (HZL).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We presented current data on antithrombotic drug utilization in patients with AF and CAD and found comorbidity burden, concomitant antiplatelet treatment and other factors to be associated with lower anticoagulant prescription rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coexisting Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within the Last Year\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian König,&nbsp;Sven Hohenstein,&nbsp;Johannes Leiner,&nbsp;Anne Nitsche,&nbsp;Alexander Staudt,&nbsp;Frank Steinborn,&nbsp;Christian Bietau,&nbsp;Henning T. Baberg,&nbsp;Michael Niehaus,&nbsp;Jürgen Tebbenjohanns,&nbsp;Melchior Seyfarth,&nbsp;Markus W. Ferrari,&nbsp;Marc M. Vorpahl,&nbsp;Ralf Kuhlen,&nbsp;Kerstin Bode,&nbsp;Andreas Bollmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70196\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and optimal antithrombotic medication improves clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. The aim of our study was to describe antithrombotic drug regimens in different patient cohorts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We investigated data from the prospective Helios Heart registry (H2) and the Heart Center Leipzig routine clinical database (HZL). We included inpatient cases with AF and CAD (hospitalized from March 2021 to July 2024 [H2] or January 2017 to December 2021 [HZL]), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the last 12 months. Information on clinical characteristics, coronary interventions, and medication prescribed was obtained from electronic case report forms and/or administrative data based on ICD-10, OPS, and ATC codes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>We included 3481 (HZL), and 205 (H2) index cases with comparable baseline characteristics. Overall, 92.5% (HZL) and 87.6% (H2) of patients were on any anticoagulation, and 93.0% (HZL) and 80.2% (H2) were prescribed ≥ 1 antiplatelet agent. There were relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy when stratifying for PCI timing. Factors associated with higher (older age) or lower (comorbidity burden, antiplatelet treatment, prior left atrial appendage occlusion) prescription rates of OAC were identified. OAC therapy without adjunctive antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased rate of rehospitalization for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months (HZL).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>We presented current data on antithrombotic drug utilization in patients with AF and CAD and found comorbidity burden, concomitant antiplatelet treatment and other factors to be associated with lower anticoagulant prescription rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12529229/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70196\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70196","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是房颤(AF)患者的常见合并症,最佳抗血栓药物可改善这一高危人群的临床结果。我们研究的目的是描述不同患者群体的抗血栓药物治疗方案。方法:研究来自Helios心脏注册表(H2)和莱比锡心脏中心常规临床数据库(HZL)的数据。我们纳入了在过去12个月内接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的房颤合并CAD住院病例(2021年3月至2024年7月[H2]或2017年1月至2021年12月[HZL])。临床特征、冠状动脉介入治疗和处方药物信息来自电子病例报告表格和/或基于ICD-10、OPS和ATC代码的管理数据。结果:我们纳入了3481例(HZL)和205例(H2)具有可比基线特征的指标病例。总体而言,92.5% (HZL)和87.6% (H2)的患者使用抗凝药物,93.0% (HZL)和80.2% (H2)的患者使用≥1种抗血小板药物。在PCI时间分层时,抗血栓治疗存在相关差异。确定与OAC处方率较高(年龄较大)或较低(合并症负担、抗血小板治疗、既往左心耳闭塞)相关的因素。无辅助抗血小板治疗的OAC治疗与12个月时主要不良心血管事件再住院率增加相关(HZL)。结论:我们提供了房颤和冠心病患者抗血栓药物使用的最新数据,发现合并症负担、伴随抗血小板治疗和其他因素与较低的抗凝处方率相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coexisting Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within the Last Year

Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Coexisting Atrial Fibrillation and Coronary Artery Disease Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Within the Last Year

Background

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a common comorbidity in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and optimal antithrombotic medication improves clinical outcomes in this high-risk population. The aim of our study was to describe antithrombotic drug regimens in different patient cohorts.

Methods

We investigated data from the prospective Helios Heart registry (H2) and the Heart Center Leipzig routine clinical database (HZL). We included inpatient cases with AF and CAD (hospitalized from March 2021 to July 2024 [H2] or January 2017 to December 2021 [HZL]), who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the last 12 months. Information on clinical characteristics, coronary interventions, and medication prescribed was obtained from electronic case report forms and/or administrative data based on ICD-10, OPS, and ATC codes.

Results

We included 3481 (HZL), and 205 (H2) index cases with comparable baseline characteristics. Overall, 92.5% (HZL) and 87.6% (H2) of patients were on any anticoagulation, and 93.0% (HZL) and 80.2% (H2) were prescribed ≥ 1 antiplatelet agent. There were relevant differences in antithrombotic therapy when stratifying for PCI timing. Factors associated with higher (older age) or lower (comorbidity burden, antiplatelet treatment, prior left atrial appendage occlusion) prescription rates of OAC were identified. OAC therapy without adjunctive antiplatelet therapy was associated with an increased rate of rehospitalization for major adverse cardiovascular events at 12 months (HZL).

Conclusion

We presented current data on antithrombotic drug utilization in patients with AF and CAD and found comorbidity burden, concomitant antiplatelet treatment and other factors to be associated with lower anticoagulant prescription rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cardiology
Clinical Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery. The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content. The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信