适合初级保健和自我评估的特应性皮炎的低成本筛选炎症指标。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Chengbin Ye, Xuyang Zhou, Ying Zou
{"title":"适合初级保健和自我评估的特应性皮炎的低成本筛选炎症指标。","authors":"Chengbin Ye, Xuyang Zhou, Ying Zou","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin condition, significantly impairs quality of life but remains underdiagnosed in primary care. Blood-cell-count-derived inflammatory indices are emerging as cost-effective biomarkers, but their pathological relevance to AD is limited and requires further discussion. <b>Methods</b>: We developed the Atopic Inflammation Index (AII), a novel blood-cell-based biomarker reflecting AD pathogenesis, and initially assessed its levels in AD patients and healthy controls using clinical samples from Shanghai, China. We then analyzed data from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2005-2006 cohort (<i>n</i> = 6855) to verify the AII-AD association and compared AII's diagnostic performance with IgE and eosinophils. <b>Results</b>: Clinical analysis showed a nonlinear association between AII and AD severity. AII effectively distinguished AD patients (including mild cases) from healthy controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001) without elevation in psoriasis or urticaria, unlike eosinophils. In NHANES 2005-2006 (<i>n</i> = 720 AD cases, 10.5%), AII levels were higher in AD compared to non-AD patients (2.33 [1.39-4.09] vs. 2.03 [1.19-3.49], <i>p</i> = 0.007) and remained independently associated after adjustment (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.003), while IgE/eosinophils showed non-significant trends. Restricted cubic splines confirmed linear prediction (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and subgroup analyses supported consistency (<i>P</i>-interaction > 0.05). AII outperformed eosinophils (AUC:0.568 vs. 0.546, <i>p</i> = 0.025) with improved detection (sensitivity 0.361→0.614). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness after excluding medications, chronic diseases and adult populations. <b>Conclusions</b>: AII is stable and reliable in screening and diagnosing AD, offering a low-cost, practical solution for primary care. This verifies the feasibility of integrating existing detection indicators into new biomarkers, providing valuable inspiration for precision medicine research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523488/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Cost-Effective Screening Inflammation Indicator for Atopic Dermatitis Suitable for Primary Care and Self-Assessment.\",\"authors\":\"Chengbin Ye, Xuyang Zhou, Ying Zou\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15192483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives</b>: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin condition, significantly impairs quality of life but remains underdiagnosed in primary care. Blood-cell-count-derived inflammatory indices are emerging as cost-effective biomarkers, but their pathological relevance to AD is limited and requires further discussion. <b>Methods</b>: We developed the Atopic Inflammation Index (AII), a novel blood-cell-based biomarker reflecting AD pathogenesis, and initially assessed its levels in AD patients and healthy controls using clinical samples from Shanghai, China. We then analyzed data from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2005-2006 cohort (<i>n</i> = 6855) to verify the AII-AD association and compared AII's diagnostic performance with IgE and eosinophils. <b>Results</b>: Clinical analysis showed a nonlinear association between AII and AD severity. AII effectively distinguished AD patients (including mild cases) from healthy controls (<i>p</i> < 0.001) without elevation in psoriasis or urticaria, unlike eosinophils. In NHANES 2005-2006 (<i>n</i> = 720 AD cases, 10.5%), AII levels were higher in AD compared to non-AD patients (2.33 [1.39-4.09] vs. 2.03 [1.19-3.49], <i>p</i> = 0.007) and remained independently associated after adjustment (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.04, <i>p</i> = 0.003), while IgE/eosinophils showed non-significant trends. Restricted cubic splines confirmed linear prediction (<i>p</i> = 0.006), and subgroup analyses supported consistency (<i>P</i>-interaction > 0.05). AII outperformed eosinophils (AUC:0.568 vs. 0.546, <i>p</i> = 0.025) with improved detection (sensitivity 0.361→0.614). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness after excluding medications, chronic diseases and adult populations. <b>Conclusions</b>: AII is stable and reliable in screening and diagnosing AD, offering a low-cost, practical solution for primary care. This verifies the feasibility of integrating existing detection indicators into new biomarkers, providing valuable inspiration for precision medicine research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523488/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192483\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:特应性皮炎(AD)是一种慢性炎症性皮肤病,严重影响生活质量,但在初级保健中仍未得到充分诊断。血细胞计数衍生的炎症指标正在成为具有成本效益的生物标志物,但其与AD的病理相关性有限,需要进一步讨论。方法:我们开发了特异应性炎症指数(AII),这是一种反映AD发病机制的基于血细胞的新型生物标志物,并使用来自中国上海的临床样本初步评估了其在AD患者和健康对照中的水平。然后,我们分析了NHANES(国家健康与营养调查)2005-2006年队列(n = 6855)的数据,以验证AII与ad的关联,并将AII与IgE和嗜酸性粒细胞的诊断性能进行了比较。结果:临床分析显示AII与AD严重程度呈非线性相关。AII有效地将AD患者(包括轻度病例)与健康对照区分(p < 0.001),而牛皮癣或荨麻疹没有升高,这与嗜酸性粒细胞不同。在NHANES 2005-2006中(n = 720例AD, 10.5%), AD患者的AII水平高于非AD患者(2.33[1.39-4.09]对2.03 [1.19-3.49],p = 0.007),调整后仍保持独立相关(OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.04, p = 0.003),而IgE/嗜酸性粒细胞无显著趋势。受限三次样条证实了线性预测(p = 0.006),亚组分析支持一致性(p -相互作用> 0.05)。AII优于嗜酸性粒细胞(AUC:0.568 vs. 0.546, p = 0.025),灵敏度提高(0.361→0.614)。在排除药物、慢性疾病和成人人群后,敏感性分析证实了稳健性。结论:AII筛查和诊断AD稳定可靠,是一种低成本、实用的初级保健解决方案。这验证了将现有检测指标整合为新的生物标志物的可行性,为精准医学研究提供了宝贵的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Cost-Effective Screening Inflammation Indicator for Atopic Dermatitis Suitable for Primary Care and Self-Assessment.

Background/Objectives: Atopic dermatitis (AD), a chronic inflammatory skin condition, significantly impairs quality of life but remains underdiagnosed in primary care. Blood-cell-count-derived inflammatory indices are emerging as cost-effective biomarkers, but their pathological relevance to AD is limited and requires further discussion. Methods: We developed the Atopic Inflammation Index (AII), a novel blood-cell-based biomarker reflecting AD pathogenesis, and initially assessed its levels in AD patients and healthy controls using clinical samples from Shanghai, China. We then analyzed data from the NHANES (National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey) 2005-2006 cohort (n = 6855) to verify the AII-AD association and compared AII's diagnostic performance with IgE and eosinophils. Results: Clinical analysis showed a nonlinear association between AII and AD severity. AII effectively distinguished AD patients (including mild cases) from healthy controls (p < 0.001) without elevation in psoriasis or urticaria, unlike eosinophils. In NHANES 2005-2006 (n = 720 AD cases, 10.5%), AII levels were higher in AD compared to non-AD patients (2.33 [1.39-4.09] vs. 2.03 [1.19-3.49], p = 0.007) and remained independently associated after adjustment (OR = 1.03, 95%CI = 1.01-1.04, p = 0.003), while IgE/eosinophils showed non-significant trends. Restricted cubic splines confirmed linear prediction (p = 0.006), and subgroup analyses supported consistency (P-interaction > 0.05). AII outperformed eosinophils (AUC:0.568 vs. 0.546, p = 0.025) with improved detection (sensitivity 0.361→0.614). Sensitivity analysis confirmed robustness after excluding medications, chronic diseases and adult populations. Conclusions: AII is stable and reliable in screening and diagnosing AD, offering a low-cost, practical solution for primary care. This verifies the feasibility of integrating existing detection indicators into new biomarkers, providing valuable inspiration for precision medicine research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信