使用锥形束计算机断层扫描在土耳其样本中调查后磨牙管的患病率和特征。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Fatoş Can, Fahrettin Kalabalık, Emre Aytuğar
{"title":"使用锥形束计算机断层扫描在土耳其样本中调查后磨牙管的患病率和特征。","authors":"Fatoş Can, Fahrettin Kalabalık, Emre Aytuğar","doi":"10.3390/diagnostics15192526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of the retromolar canal (RMC) and retromolar foramen (RMF) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to evaluate the course and anatomical structure of the RMC. <b>Methods:</b> The study group consisted of CBCT images of 1008 subjects (541 females and 467 males). The prevalence and types of the RMC, as well as the frequency of the RMF, were analyzed according to age and sex. A significance level of 0.05 was accepted for all statistical analyses. <b>Results:</b> According to the findings, 575 (57.0%) RMCs and 298 (29.5%) RMFs were identified in 1008 subjects. Bilateral RMCs were observed in 327 subjects (32.4%), while unilateral RMCs were present in 248 subjects (24.6%). When 2016 retromolar regions were examined, a total of 902 RMCs and 400 RMFs were identified. No statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left retromolar regions or between sexes regarding the overall prevalence of RMCs (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The most frequently observed RMC type was Type A1, and a statistically significant difference was found between RMC types and sex. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggested that the RMC is a common anatomical variation that may have surgical relevance. Due to the presence of a neurovascular bundle passing through it, both the RMC and RMF should be considered in surgical and anesthetic procedures involving the retromolar region. CBCT is a reliable tool for detecting these structures and assessing their morphology.</p>","PeriodicalId":11225,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostics","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523425/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Prevalence and Characteristics of the Retromolar Canal Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Turkish Sample.\",\"authors\":\"Fatoş Can, Fahrettin Kalabalık, Emre Aytuğar\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/diagnostics15192526\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of the retromolar canal (RMC) and retromolar foramen (RMF) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to evaluate the course and anatomical structure of the RMC. <b>Methods:</b> The study group consisted of CBCT images of 1008 subjects (541 females and 467 males). The prevalence and types of the RMC, as well as the frequency of the RMF, were analyzed according to age and sex. A significance level of 0.05 was accepted for all statistical analyses. <b>Results:</b> According to the findings, 575 (57.0%) RMCs and 298 (29.5%) RMFs were identified in 1008 subjects. Bilateral RMCs were observed in 327 subjects (32.4%), while unilateral RMCs were present in 248 subjects (24.6%). When 2016 retromolar regions were examined, a total of 902 RMCs and 400 RMFs were identified. No statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left retromolar regions or between sexes regarding the overall prevalence of RMCs (<i>p</i> > 0.05). The most frequently observed RMC type was Type A1, and a statistically significant difference was found between RMC types and sex. <b>Conclusions:</b> This study suggested that the RMC is a common anatomical variation that may have surgical relevance. Due to the presence of a neurovascular bundle passing through it, both the RMC and RMF should be considered in surgical and anesthetic procedures involving the retromolar region. CBCT is a reliable tool for detecting these structures and assessing their morphology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnostics\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523425/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnostics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192526\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15192526","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究的目的是利用锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)研究磨牙后管(RMC)和磨牙后孔(RMF)的患病率,并评估RMC的病程和解剖结构。方法:研究组包括1008例受试者(女性541例,男性467例)的CBCT图像。根据年龄和性别对RMC的患病率和类型以及RMF的频率进行了分析。所有统计分析均采用显著性水平0.05。结果:1008例受试者共发现RMFs 575例(57.0%),RMFs 298例(29.5%)。327例(32.4%)患者出现双侧rmc, 248例(24.6%)患者出现单侧rmc。在2016年对后磨牙区域进行检查时,共鉴定出902个RMCs和400个RMFs。右、左磨牙后区、性别间RMCs总体患病率差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。最常见的RMC类型为A1型,且RMC类型和性别之间存在统计学差异。结论:本研究提示RMC是一种常见的解剖变异,可能与手术相关。由于存在神经血管束通过,在涉及磨牙后区域的手术和麻醉过程中,RMC和RMF都应考虑。CBCT是检测这些结构和评估其形态的可靠工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigation of the Prevalence and Characteristics of the Retromolar Canal Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Turkish Sample.

Investigation of the Prevalence and Characteristics of the Retromolar Canal Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography in a Turkish Sample.

Background: The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence of the retromolar canal (RMC) and retromolar foramen (RMF) using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to evaluate the course and anatomical structure of the RMC. Methods: The study group consisted of CBCT images of 1008 subjects (541 females and 467 males). The prevalence and types of the RMC, as well as the frequency of the RMF, were analyzed according to age and sex. A significance level of 0.05 was accepted for all statistical analyses. Results: According to the findings, 575 (57.0%) RMCs and 298 (29.5%) RMFs were identified in 1008 subjects. Bilateral RMCs were observed in 327 subjects (32.4%), while unilateral RMCs were present in 248 subjects (24.6%). When 2016 retromolar regions were examined, a total of 902 RMCs and 400 RMFs were identified. No statistically significant difference was observed between the right and left retromolar regions or between sexes regarding the overall prevalence of RMCs (p > 0.05). The most frequently observed RMC type was Type A1, and a statistically significant difference was found between RMC types and sex. Conclusions: This study suggested that the RMC is a common anatomical variation that may have surgical relevance. Due to the presence of a neurovascular bundle passing through it, both the RMC and RMF should be considered in surgical and anesthetic procedures involving the retromolar region. CBCT is a reliable tool for detecting these structures and assessing their morphology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostics
Diagnostics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Clinical Biochemistry
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
2699
审稿时长
19.64 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostics (ISSN 2075-4418) is an international scholarly open access journal on medical diagnostics. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications and short notes on the research and development of medical diagnostics. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodological details must be provided for research articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信