Ella G Markalunas, Shannon E Harold, David H Arnold, Julie C Martin, W Jeffery Edenfield, Anna V Blenda
{"title":"人工ELISA与Ella自动ELISA检测乳腺癌患者血清半乳糖凝集素-3水平的比较分析。","authors":"Ella G Markalunas, Shannon E Harold, David H Arnold, Julie C Martin, W Jeffery Edenfield, Anna V Blenda","doi":"10.3390/cancers17193206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Circulating galectin-3 (Gal-3) levels have been indicated as a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic target in breast cancer patients. Specifically, serum galectin-3 levels are traditionally measured using manual Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), but recent automated methods, such as Simple Plex assay by ProteinSimple™ run on an Ella instrument, have shown promising evidence of being more efficient and less error-prone than manual methods. This paper aims to assess whether there are differences in serum galectin-3 measurements between manual and automated ELISA methods. <b>Methods</b>: Serum galectin-3 levels were initially analyzed from one hundred and fifteen breast cancer samples using both manual ELISA and the Ella instrument. Following coefficient of variation (CV) and outlier analysis, ninety-five samples were analyzed further with JMP statistical software to perform Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman's correlation, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and regression analyses. <b>Results</b>: The Ella instrument resulted in significantly lower CV values, confirming that it is more precise and reliable than manual ELISA methods. There was a moderate correlation between ELISA and Ella measurements (r = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), but a Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that serum gaelectin-3 measurements obtained with the Ella instrument were significantly lower compared to those obtained with manual ELISA, with a mean difference of -5.19 ng/mL (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed a significant increase in the difference between manual ELISA and Ella measurements as serum galectin-3 levels increase (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). This difference in measurements between manual and automated ELISA techniques remained consistent when analyses were performed within each breast cancer stage, immunophenotype, and histology. <b>Conclusions</b>: While the Ella instrument is a fast and reliable tool, the discrepancies between manual ELISA and the Ella instrument in quantifying serum galectin-3 levels are important to consider prior to widespread use.</p>","PeriodicalId":9681,"journal":{"name":"Cancers","volume":"17 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Manual ELISA and Ella, an Automated Instrument for ELISA, in Measuring Serum Galectin-3 Levels in Breast Cancer Patient Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Ella G Markalunas, Shannon E Harold, David H Arnold, Julie C Martin, W Jeffery Edenfield, Anna V Blenda\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/cancers17193206\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: Circulating galectin-3 (Gal-3) levels have been indicated as a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic target in breast cancer patients. Specifically, serum galectin-3 levels are traditionally measured using manual Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), but recent automated methods, such as Simple Plex assay by ProteinSimple™ run on an Ella instrument, have shown promising evidence of being more efficient and less error-prone than manual methods. This paper aims to assess whether there are differences in serum galectin-3 measurements between manual and automated ELISA methods. <b>Methods</b>: Serum galectin-3 levels were initially analyzed from one hundred and fifteen breast cancer samples using both manual ELISA and the Ella instrument. Following coefficient of variation (CV) and outlier analysis, ninety-five samples were analyzed further with JMP statistical software to perform Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman's correlation, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and regression analyses. <b>Results</b>: The Ella instrument resulted in significantly lower CV values, confirming that it is more precise and reliable than manual ELISA methods. There was a moderate correlation between ELISA and Ella measurements (r = 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), but a Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that serum gaelectin-3 measurements obtained with the Ella instrument were significantly lower compared to those obtained with manual ELISA, with a mean difference of -5.19 ng/mL (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed a significant increase in the difference between manual ELISA and Ella measurements as serum galectin-3 levels increase (<i>p</i> < 0.0001). This difference in measurements between manual and automated ELISA techniques remained consistent when analyses were performed within each breast cancer stage, immunophenotype, and histology. <b>Conclusions</b>: While the Ella instrument is a fast and reliable tool, the discrepancies between manual ELISA and the Ella instrument in quantifying serum galectin-3 levels are important to consider prior to widespread use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancers\",\"volume\":\"17 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193206\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancers","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17193206","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative Analysis of Manual ELISA and Ella, an Automated Instrument for ELISA, in Measuring Serum Galectin-3 Levels in Breast Cancer Patient Samples.
Background: Circulating galectin-3 (Gal-3) levels have been indicated as a promising diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic target in breast cancer patients. Specifically, serum galectin-3 levels are traditionally measured using manual Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA), but recent automated methods, such as Simple Plex assay by ProteinSimple™ run on an Ella instrument, have shown promising evidence of being more efficient and less error-prone than manual methods. This paper aims to assess whether there are differences in serum galectin-3 measurements between manual and automated ELISA methods. Methods: Serum galectin-3 levels were initially analyzed from one hundred and fifteen breast cancer samples using both manual ELISA and the Ella instrument. Following coefficient of variation (CV) and outlier analysis, ninety-five samples were analyzed further with JMP statistical software to perform Shapiro-Wilk, Spearman's correlation, Wilcoxon signed-rank, and regression analyses. Results: The Ella instrument resulted in significantly lower CV values, confirming that it is more precise and reliable than manual ELISA methods. There was a moderate correlation between ELISA and Ella measurements (r = 0.49, p < 0.0001), but a Wilcoxon signed-rank test revealed that serum gaelectin-3 measurements obtained with the Ella instrument were significantly lower compared to those obtained with manual ELISA, with a mean difference of -5.19 ng/mL (p < 0.0001). Regression analysis showed a significant increase in the difference between manual ELISA and Ella measurements as serum galectin-3 levels increase (p < 0.0001). This difference in measurements between manual and automated ELISA techniques remained consistent when analyses were performed within each breast cancer stage, immunophenotype, and histology. Conclusions: While the Ella instrument is a fast and reliable tool, the discrepancies between manual ELISA and the Ella instrument in quantifying serum galectin-3 levels are important to consider prior to widespread use.
期刊介绍:
Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal on oncology. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced.