Ruhani Desai, Filemon Tan, Minghua Wu, Jeffery L Browning, Samuel Theodore, Meng Zhang, Brian Skaug, Harshdeep Singh Chawla, Manmohan Singh, Salavat Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin, Maureen Mayes, Shervin Assassi
{"title":"使用高频超声和剪切波弹性成像评估系统性硬化症患者的皮肤:组织学、分子和临床参数的比较研究。","authors":"Ruhani Desai, Filemon Tan, Minghua Wu, Jeffery L Browning, Samuel Theodore, Meng Zhang, Brian Skaug, Harshdeep Singh Chawla, Manmohan Singh, Salavat Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin, Maureen Mayes, Shervin Assassi","doi":"10.1002/acr.25658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, a large-scale comparison of US-based assessment with histological markers of skin fibrosis has not been reported. We evaluated the US-based skin assessments for their face validity (differentiation between involved SSc and healthy control [HC] skin), construct validity (comparison to modified Rodnan Skin score [mRSS]), and criterion validity (comparison to histological and gene expression fibrosis markers).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty HCs and 52 SSc patients underwent clinical and US assessment followed by a forearm skin biopsy. Predefined areas were assessed on the finger, hand, and forearm bilaterally. mRSS, US, histological and molecular (RT-qPCR) evaluations were performed by blinded, independent assessors. Dermal thickness, echogenicity, and elastography were assessed using a high-frequency GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound machine.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Except in the hand area, the US variables could not differentiate between HC and clinically affected SSc skin (face validity). There was only a weak to moderate correlation between US-based measurements and mRSS in the hand and finger areas (construct validity). US-based thickness showed moderate correlation with histological thickness (Rs=0.43, 0.002), but no statistically significant correlations with other histological or gene expression markers of fibrosis in SSc patients (criterion validity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-frequency US assessment of SSc skin does not show consistent and strong face, construct, or criterion validity. The role of this assessment tool remains limited, underscoring the need for further development of a quantitative and accurate tool for assessing SSc skin fibrosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8406,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of skin in patients with systemic sclerosis using high-frequency ultrasound and shear wave elastography: A comparative study with histology, molecular and clinical parameters.\",\"authors\":\"Ruhani Desai, Filemon Tan, Minghua Wu, Jeffery L Browning, Samuel Theodore, Meng Zhang, Brian Skaug, Harshdeep Singh Chawla, Manmohan Singh, Salavat Aglyamov, Kirill V Larin, Maureen Mayes, Shervin Assassi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acr.25658\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, a large-scale comparison of US-based assessment with histological markers of skin fibrosis has not been reported. We evaluated the US-based skin assessments for their face validity (differentiation between involved SSc and healthy control [HC] skin), construct validity (comparison to modified Rodnan Skin score [mRSS]), and criterion validity (comparison to histological and gene expression fibrosis markers).</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Twenty HCs and 52 SSc patients underwent clinical and US assessment followed by a forearm skin biopsy. Predefined areas were assessed on the finger, hand, and forearm bilaterally. mRSS, US, histological and molecular (RT-qPCR) evaluations were performed by blinded, independent assessors. Dermal thickness, echogenicity, and elastography were assessed using a high-frequency GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound machine.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>Except in the hand area, the US variables could not differentiate between HC and clinically affected SSc skin (face validity). There was only a weak to moderate correlation between US-based measurements and mRSS in the hand and finger areas (construct validity). US-based thickness showed moderate correlation with histological thickness (Rs=0.43, 0.002), but no statistically significant correlations with other histological or gene expression markers of fibrosis in SSc patients (criterion validity).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-frequency US assessment of SSc skin does not show consistent and strong face, construct, or criterion validity. The role of this assessment tool remains limited, underscoring the need for further development of a quantitative and accurate tool for assessing SSc skin fibrosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8406,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arthritis Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25658\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.25658","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of skin in patients with systemic sclerosis using high-frequency ultrasound and shear wave elastography: A comparative study with histology, molecular and clinical parameters.
Objective: Ultrasound (US) has been proposed as a potential tool for assessing skin fibrosis in systemic sclerosis (SSc). However, a large-scale comparison of US-based assessment with histological markers of skin fibrosis has not been reported. We evaluated the US-based skin assessments for their face validity (differentiation between involved SSc and healthy control [HC] skin), construct validity (comparison to modified Rodnan Skin score [mRSS]), and criterion validity (comparison to histological and gene expression fibrosis markers).
Method: Twenty HCs and 52 SSc patients underwent clinical and US assessment followed by a forearm skin biopsy. Predefined areas were assessed on the finger, hand, and forearm bilaterally. mRSS, US, histological and molecular (RT-qPCR) evaluations were performed by blinded, independent assessors. Dermal thickness, echogenicity, and elastography were assessed using a high-frequency GE LOGIQ P9 ultrasound machine.
Result: Except in the hand area, the US variables could not differentiate between HC and clinically affected SSc skin (face validity). There was only a weak to moderate correlation between US-based measurements and mRSS in the hand and finger areas (construct validity). US-based thickness showed moderate correlation with histological thickness (Rs=0.43, 0.002), but no statistically significant correlations with other histological or gene expression markers of fibrosis in SSc patients (criterion validity).
Conclusion: High-frequency US assessment of SSc skin does not show consistent and strong face, construct, or criterion validity. The role of this assessment tool remains limited, underscoring the need for further development of a quantitative and accurate tool for assessing SSc skin fibrosis.
期刊介绍:
Arthritis Care & Research, an official journal of the American College of Rheumatology and the Association of Rheumatology Health Professionals (a division of the College), is a peer-reviewed publication that publishes original research, review articles, and editorials that promote excellence in the clinical practice of rheumatology. Relevant to the care of individuals with rheumatic diseases, major topics are evidence-based practice studies, clinical problems, practice guidelines, educational, social, and public health issues, health economics, health care policy, and future trends in rheumatology practice.