泛型群体中重复基因组选择的效率。

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Animals Pub Date : 2025-10-09 DOI:10.3390/ani15192925
José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Jean Paulo Aparecido da Silva, Paulo Sávio Lopes
{"title":"泛型群体中重复基因组选择的效率。","authors":"José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Jean Paulo Aparecido da Silva, Paulo Sávio Lopes","doi":"10.3390/ani15192925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Simulation-based studies can support breeders' decisions inexpensively, since there is no need to perform a new procedure. The objective was to assess the efficiency of recurrent genomic selection in panmictic population under additive-dominance and additive-dominance with epistasis models. We assumed two broiler chicken populations with contrasting linkage disequilibrium (LD) levels, 38,500 SNPs, and 1000 genes controlling feed conversion ratio. We applied recurrent genomic selection over seven cycles. The genomic selection efficacy, expressed as realized total genetic gain, was proportional to the LD level and genotypic variance. Genomic selection required model updating to achieve a higher efficacy. The training set size required by genomic selection can be as low as 10%/generation. Under this low-cost scenario, the genomic selection efficacy was slightly lower than the maximum efficacy. There is no difference between genetic evaluation methods regarding the decrease in the genotypic variance due to selection. In general, additive value prediction accuracies and realized genetic gains were highly correlated. The accumulated inbreeding level was not high due to avoidance of sib cross. The genomic inbreeding coefficient over generations was close to zero. Except for dominant epistasis, the efficacy of genomic selection was 4.1 to 46.2% lower than the efficacy under no epistasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7955,"journal":{"name":"Animals","volume":"15 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523783/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.\",\"authors\":\"José Marcelo Soriano Viana, Jean Paulo Aparecido da Silva, Paulo Sávio Lopes\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ani15192925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Simulation-based studies can support breeders' decisions inexpensively, since there is no need to perform a new procedure. The objective was to assess the efficiency of recurrent genomic selection in panmictic population under additive-dominance and additive-dominance with epistasis models. We assumed two broiler chicken populations with contrasting linkage disequilibrium (LD) levels, 38,500 SNPs, and 1000 genes controlling feed conversion ratio. We applied recurrent genomic selection over seven cycles. The genomic selection efficacy, expressed as realized total genetic gain, was proportional to the LD level and genotypic variance. Genomic selection required model updating to achieve a higher efficacy. The training set size required by genomic selection can be as low as 10%/generation. Under this low-cost scenario, the genomic selection efficacy was slightly lower than the maximum efficacy. There is no difference between genetic evaluation methods regarding the decrease in the genotypic variance due to selection. In general, additive value prediction accuracies and realized genetic gains were highly correlated. The accumulated inbreeding level was not high due to avoidance of sib cross. The genomic inbreeding coefficient over generations was close to zero. Except for dominant epistasis, the efficacy of genomic selection was 4.1 to 46.2% lower than the efficacy under no epistasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7955,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Animals\",\"volume\":\"15 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523783/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ani15192925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

基于模拟的研究可以以较低的成本支持育种者的决策,因为不需要执行新的程序。目的是评估在加性显性和加性显性与上位模型下,在泛型群体中重复基因组选择的效率。我们假设两个肉鸡群体具有不同的连锁不平衡(LD)水平,38,500个snp和1000个控制饲料转化率的基因。我们在七个周期中应用了重复基因组选择。基因组选择效率,以实现的总遗传增益表示,与LD水平和基因型方差成正比。基因组选择需要更新模型以达到更高的效率。基因组选择所需的训练集大小可以低至10%/代。在这种低成本情景下,基因组选择效率略低于最大效率。在遗传评价方法中,由于选择导致的基因型变异的减小没有差异。总体而言,加性值预测精度与实现遗传增益高度相关。由于避免了近亲杂交,累积近交水平不高。世代间的基因组近交系数接近于零。除显性上位性外,基因组选择的效率比无上位性的效率低4.1 ~ 46.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.

Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.

Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.

Efficiency of Recurrent Genomic Selection in Panmictic Populations.

Simulation-based studies can support breeders' decisions inexpensively, since there is no need to perform a new procedure. The objective was to assess the efficiency of recurrent genomic selection in panmictic population under additive-dominance and additive-dominance with epistasis models. We assumed two broiler chicken populations with contrasting linkage disequilibrium (LD) levels, 38,500 SNPs, and 1000 genes controlling feed conversion ratio. We applied recurrent genomic selection over seven cycles. The genomic selection efficacy, expressed as realized total genetic gain, was proportional to the LD level and genotypic variance. Genomic selection required model updating to achieve a higher efficacy. The training set size required by genomic selection can be as low as 10%/generation. Under this low-cost scenario, the genomic selection efficacy was slightly lower than the maximum efficacy. There is no difference between genetic evaluation methods regarding the decrease in the genotypic variance due to selection. In general, additive value prediction accuracies and realized genetic gains were highly correlated. The accumulated inbreeding level was not high due to avoidance of sib cross. The genomic inbreeding coefficient over generations was close to zero. Except for dominant epistasis, the efficacy of genomic selection was 4.1 to 46.2% lower than the efficacy under no epistasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Animals
Animals Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
3015
审稿时长
20.52 days
期刊介绍: Animals (ISSN 2076-2615) is an international and interdisciplinary scholarly open access journal. It publishes original research articles, reviews, communications, and short notes that are relevant to any field of study that involves animals, including zoology, ethnozoology, animal science, animal ethics and animal welfare. However, preference will be given to those articles that provide an understanding of animals within a larger context (i.e., the animals'' interactions with the outside world, including humans). There is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental details and/or method of study, must be provided for research articles. Articles submitted that involve subjecting animals to unnecessary pain or suffering will not be accepted, and all articles must be submitted with the necessary ethical approval (please refer to the Ethical Guidelines for more information).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信