生成式人工智能时代科学评估的多模态交互框架

IF 4.5 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yizhu Gao, Xiaoming Zhai, Min Li, Gyeonggeon Lee, Xiaoxiao Liu
{"title":"生成式人工智能时代科学评估的多模态交互框架","authors":"Yizhu Gao,&nbsp;Xiaoming Zhai,&nbsp;Min Li,&nbsp;Gyeonggeon Lee,&nbsp;Xiaoxiao Liu","doi":"10.1002/tea.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising authentic learning and evaluations. Addressing these challenges requires reflection on existing assessment practices and features. This position paper advances a conceptual framework for science assessment through the lens of <i>multimodality</i> and <i>interactivity</i>. Multimodality emphasizes the use of diverse, organized semiotic resources for meaning making, while interactivity characterizes assessment environments where outcomes are shaped by students' actions. With the two dimensions, our multimodal interactive framework classifies assessments into four categories, with varying degrees of modality and interactivity. We argue that tasks with higher modality and interactivity can potentially overcome the concerns of GenAI on academic integrity. To further articulate this point, we provide concrete assessment examples for each category and explain how the prompt and response affordances in each assessment category help gauge students' understandings of key science constructs and identify tasks that are resistant or susceptible to AI-based outsourcing. We conclude by discussing how the framework serves as a meaningful analytical tool for educational researchers and practitioners.</p>","PeriodicalId":48369,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","volume":"62 9","pages":"2014-2028"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Yizhu Gao,&nbsp;Xiaoming Zhai,&nbsp;Min Li,&nbsp;Gyeonggeon Lee,&nbsp;Xiaoxiao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tea.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising authentic learning and evaluations. Addressing these challenges requires reflection on existing assessment practices and features. This position paper advances a conceptual framework for science assessment through the lens of <i>multimodality</i> and <i>interactivity</i>. Multimodality emphasizes the use of diverse, organized semiotic resources for meaning making, while interactivity characterizes assessment environments where outcomes are shaped by students' actions. With the two dimensions, our multimodal interactive framework classifies assessments into four categories, with varying degrees of modality and interactivity. We argue that tasks with higher modality and interactivity can potentially overcome the concerns of GenAI on academic integrity. To further articulate this point, we provide concrete assessment examples for each category and explain how the prompt and response affordances in each assessment category help gauge students' understandings of key science constructs and identify tasks that are resistant or susceptible to AI-based outsourcing. We conclude by discussing how the framework serves as a meaningful analytical tool for educational researchers and practitioners.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48369,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Science Teaching\",\"volume\":\"62 9\",\"pages\":\"2014-2028\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/tea.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Science Teaching\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.70009\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Science Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tea.70009","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生成式人工智能(GenAI)的快速发展正在通过促进创新的教学范式来改变科学教育,同时引发了对学术诚信的实质性关注。一个特别紧迫的问题是,学生使用GenAI工具外包评估任务的风险越来越大,这可能会损害真实的学习和评估。解决这些挑战需要对现有的评估实践和特征进行反思。本立场文件通过多模态和互动性的视角提出了科学评估的概念框架。多模态强调使用多样化的、有组织的符号资源来创造意义,而互动性则是评估环境的特征,在评估环境中,结果是由学生的行动决定的。通过这两个维度,我们的多模态交互框架将评估分为四类,具有不同程度的模态和交互性。我们认为,具有更高的模态和互动性的任务可以潜在地克服GenAI对学术诚信的担忧。为了进一步阐明这一点,我们为每个类别提供了具体的评估示例,并解释了每个评估类别中的提示和响应能力如何帮助衡量学生对关键科学结构的理解,并确定对基于人工智能的外包有抵抗力或易受影响的任务。最后,我们讨论了该框架如何成为教育研究者和实践者的有意义的分析工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

A Multimodal Interactive Framework for Science Assessment in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence

The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is transforming science education by facilitating innovative pedagogical paradigms while raising substantial concerns about scholarly integrity. One particularly pressing issue is the growing risk of student use of GenAI tools to outsource assessment tasks, potentially compromising authentic learning and evaluations. Addressing these challenges requires reflection on existing assessment practices and features. This position paper advances a conceptual framework for science assessment through the lens of multimodality and interactivity. Multimodality emphasizes the use of diverse, organized semiotic resources for meaning making, while interactivity characterizes assessment environments where outcomes are shaped by students' actions. With the two dimensions, our multimodal interactive framework classifies assessments into four categories, with varying degrees of modality and interactivity. We argue that tasks with higher modality and interactivity can potentially overcome the concerns of GenAI on academic integrity. To further articulate this point, we provide concrete assessment examples for each category and explain how the prompt and response affordances in each assessment category help gauge students' understandings of key science constructs and identify tasks that are resistant or susceptible to AI-based outsourcing. We conclude by discussing how the framework serves as a meaningful analytical tool for educational researchers and practitioners.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Science Teaching
Journal of Research in Science Teaching EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
19.60%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, the official journal of NARST: A Worldwide Organization for Improving Science Teaching and Learning Through Research, publishes reports for science education researchers and practitioners on issues of science teaching and learning and science education policy. Scholarly manuscripts within the domain of the Journal of Research in Science Teaching include, but are not limited to, investigations employing qualitative, ethnographic, historical, survey, philosophical, case study research, quantitative, experimental, quasi-experimental, data mining, and data analytics approaches; position papers; policy perspectives; critical reviews of the literature; and comments and criticism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信