Seth Kane, Baishakhi Bose, Jin Fan, Thomas Hendrickson, Sarah Nordahl, Corinne D. Scown, Sabbie Miller
{"title":"一种新型储碳建筑材料的生命周期评估框架","authors":"Seth Kane, Baishakhi Bose, Jin Fan, Thomas Hendrickson, Sarah Nordahl, Corinne D. Scown, Sabbie Miller","doi":"10.1039/d5ee02728d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, materials production of materials is responsible for over 25% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. However, due to their long-lived nature and enormous scale of production, some building materials offer a potential means for atmospheric carbon storage. Accurate emissions accounting is key to understanding this potential, yet life-cycle inventory (LCI) databases struggle to keep up with the wide array of novel materials and provide the data to accurately characterize their effect on net carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions and uptake. To this end, we offer a framework for developing LCIs from the ground up using thermodynamic first principles and provide guidance on alternative approaches to characterize material LCIs from limited data when first principles approaches are not feasible. This framework provides a generalizable methodology to develop and compare LCIs of novel material production. To ensure the accuracy of this framework and provide step-by-step examples of its application, we consider the following mineral-based and bio-based building materials: Portland cement, low-carbon steel, gypsum board, and cross-laminated timber from yellow poplar and from eastern hemlock, showing good agreement with existing LCIs. This framework is developed with a particular focus on describing CO2e emissions and energy consumption of material production, but it could be extended to other environmental impacts or applications. Grounding initial LCIs in first principles can guide the early-stage design of novel materials and processes to minimize CO2e emissions or improve the carbon sequestration potential of critical materials across sectors.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"75 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A framework for ground-up life cycle assessment of novel, carbon-storing building materials\",\"authors\":\"Seth Kane, Baishakhi Bose, Jin Fan, Thomas Hendrickson, Sarah Nordahl, Corinne D. Scown, Sabbie Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d5ee02728d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Currently, materials production of materials is responsible for over 25% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. However, due to their long-lived nature and enormous scale of production, some building materials offer a potential means for atmospheric carbon storage. Accurate emissions accounting is key to understanding this potential, yet life-cycle inventory (LCI) databases struggle to keep up with the wide array of novel materials and provide the data to accurately characterize their effect on net carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions and uptake. To this end, we offer a framework for developing LCIs from the ground up using thermodynamic first principles and provide guidance on alternative approaches to characterize material LCIs from limited data when first principles approaches are not feasible. This framework provides a generalizable methodology to develop and compare LCIs of novel material production. To ensure the accuracy of this framework and provide step-by-step examples of its application, we consider the following mineral-based and bio-based building materials: Portland cement, low-carbon steel, gypsum board, and cross-laminated timber from yellow poplar and from eastern hemlock, showing good agreement with existing LCIs. This framework is developed with a particular focus on describing CO2e emissions and energy consumption of material production, but it could be extended to other environmental impacts or applications. Grounding initial LCIs in first principles can guide the early-stage design of novel materials and processes to minimize CO2e emissions or improve the carbon sequestration potential of critical materials across sectors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"volume\":\"75 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":30.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy & Environmental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ee02728d\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d5ee02728d","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A framework for ground-up life cycle assessment of novel, carbon-storing building materials
Currently, materials production of materials is responsible for over 25% of anthropogenic CO2 emissions. However, due to their long-lived nature and enormous scale of production, some building materials offer a potential means for atmospheric carbon storage. Accurate emissions accounting is key to understanding this potential, yet life-cycle inventory (LCI) databases struggle to keep up with the wide array of novel materials and provide the data to accurately characterize their effect on net carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions and uptake. To this end, we offer a framework for developing LCIs from the ground up using thermodynamic first principles and provide guidance on alternative approaches to characterize material LCIs from limited data when first principles approaches are not feasible. This framework provides a generalizable methodology to develop and compare LCIs of novel material production. To ensure the accuracy of this framework and provide step-by-step examples of its application, we consider the following mineral-based and bio-based building materials: Portland cement, low-carbon steel, gypsum board, and cross-laminated timber from yellow poplar and from eastern hemlock, showing good agreement with existing LCIs. This framework is developed with a particular focus on describing CO2e emissions and energy consumption of material production, but it could be extended to other environmental impacts or applications. Grounding initial LCIs in first principles can guide the early-stage design of novel materials and processes to minimize CO2e emissions or improve the carbon sequestration potential of critical materials across sectors.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).