Claudius G Krause, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Gregor Kasieczka, Benjamin Nachman, Dalila Salamani, David Shih, Anna Zaborowska, Oz Amram, Kerstin Borras, Matthew R Buckley, Erik Buhmann, Thorsten Buss, Renato Paulo Da Costa Cardoso, Anthony L Caterini, Nadezda Chernyavskaya, Federico A G Corchia, Jesse C Cresswell, Sascha Diefenbacher, Etienne Dreyer, Vijay Ekambaram, Engin Eren, Florian Ernst, Luigi Favaro, Matteo Franchini, Frank Gaede, Eilam Gross, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Kristina Jaruskova, Benno Käch, Jayant Kalagnanam, Raghav Kansal, Taewoo Kim, Dmitrii Kobylianskii, Anatolii Korol, William Korcari, Dirk Krücker, Katja Krüger, Marco Letizia, Shu Li, Qibin Liu, Xiulong Liu, Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Thandi Madula, Peter McKeown, Isabell-A Melzer-Pellmann, Vinicius Mikuni, Nam Nguyen, Ayodele Ore, Sofia Palacios Schweitzer, Ian Pang, Kevin Pedro, Tilman Plehn, Witold Pokorski, Huilin Qu, Piyush Raikwar, John Andrew Raine, Humberto Reyes-González, Lorenzo Rinaldi, Brendan Leigh Ross, Moritz Alfons Wilhelm Alfons Wilhelm Scham, Simon Schnake, Chase Shimmin, Eli Shlizerman, Nathalie Soybelman, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Kalliopi Tsolaki, Sofia Vallecorsa, Kyongmin Yeo, Rui Zhang
{"title":"CaloChallenge 2022:快速量热计模拟社区挑战赛。","authors":"Claudius G Krause, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Gregor Kasieczka, Benjamin Nachman, Dalila Salamani, David Shih, Anna Zaborowska, Oz Amram, Kerstin Borras, Matthew R Buckley, Erik Buhmann, Thorsten Buss, Renato Paulo Da Costa Cardoso, Anthony L Caterini, Nadezda Chernyavskaya, Federico A G Corchia, Jesse C Cresswell, Sascha Diefenbacher, Etienne Dreyer, Vijay Ekambaram, Engin Eren, Florian Ernst, Luigi Favaro, Matteo Franchini, Frank Gaede, Eilam Gross, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Kristina Jaruskova, Benno Käch, Jayant Kalagnanam, Raghav Kansal, Taewoo Kim, Dmitrii Kobylianskii, Anatolii Korol, William Korcari, Dirk Krücker, Katja Krüger, Marco Letizia, Shu Li, Qibin Liu, Xiulong Liu, Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Thandi Madula, Peter McKeown, Isabell-A Melzer-Pellmann, Vinicius Mikuni, Nam Nguyen, Ayodele Ore, Sofia Palacios Schweitzer, Ian Pang, Kevin Pedro, Tilman Plehn, Witold Pokorski, Huilin Qu, Piyush Raikwar, John Andrew Raine, Humberto Reyes-González, Lorenzo Rinaldi, Brendan Leigh Ross, Moritz Alfons Wilhelm Alfons Wilhelm Scham, Simon Schnake, Chase Shimmin, Eli Shlizerman, Nathalie Soybelman, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Kalliopi Tsolaki, Sofia Vallecorsa, Kyongmin Yeo, Rui Zhang","doi":"10.1088/1361-6633/ae1304","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We present the results of the ``Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022'' --- the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.</p>","PeriodicalId":74666,"journal":{"name":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CaloChallenge 2022: A community challenge for fast calorimeter simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Claudius G Krause, Michele Faucci Giannelli, Gregor Kasieczka, Benjamin Nachman, Dalila Salamani, David Shih, Anna Zaborowska, Oz Amram, Kerstin Borras, Matthew R Buckley, Erik Buhmann, Thorsten Buss, Renato Paulo Da Costa Cardoso, Anthony L Caterini, Nadezda Chernyavskaya, Federico A G Corchia, Jesse C Cresswell, Sascha Diefenbacher, Etienne Dreyer, Vijay Ekambaram, Engin Eren, Florian Ernst, Luigi Favaro, Matteo Franchini, Frank Gaede, Eilam Gross, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Kristina Jaruskova, Benno Käch, Jayant Kalagnanam, Raghav Kansal, Taewoo Kim, Dmitrii Kobylianskii, Anatolii Korol, William Korcari, Dirk Krücker, Katja Krüger, Marco Letizia, Shu Li, Qibin Liu, Xiulong Liu, Gabriel Loaiza-Ganem, Thandi Madula, Peter McKeown, Isabell-A Melzer-Pellmann, Vinicius Mikuni, Nam Nguyen, Ayodele Ore, Sofia Palacios Schweitzer, Ian Pang, Kevin Pedro, Tilman Plehn, Witold Pokorski, Huilin Qu, Piyush Raikwar, John Andrew Raine, Humberto Reyes-González, Lorenzo Rinaldi, Brendan Leigh Ross, Moritz Alfons Wilhelm Alfons Wilhelm Scham, Simon Schnake, Chase Shimmin, Eli Shlizerman, Nathalie Soybelman, Mudhakar Srivatsa, Kalliopi Tsolaki, Sofia Vallecorsa, Kyongmin Yeo, Rui Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6633/ae1304\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We present the results of the ``Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022'' --- the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74666,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ae1304\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ae1304","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
CaloChallenge 2022: A community challenge for fast calorimeter simulation.
We present the results of the ``Fast Calorimeter Simulation Challenge 2022'' --- the CaloChallenge. We study state-of-the-art generative models on four calorimeter shower datasets of increasing dimensionality, ranging from a few hundred voxels to a few tens of thousand voxels. The 31 individual submissions span a wide range of current popular generative architectures, including Variational AutoEncoders (VAEs), Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Normalizing Flows, Diffusion models, and models based on Conditional Flow Matching. We compare all submissions in terms of quality of generated calorimeter showers, as well as shower generation time and model size. To assess the quality we use a broad range of different metrics including differences in 1-dimensional histograms of observables, KPD/FPD scores, AUCs of binary classifiers, and the log-posterior of a multiclass classifier. The results of the CaloChallenge provide the most complete and comprehensive survey of cutting-edge approaches to calorimeter fast simulation to date. In addition, our work provides a uniquely detailed perspective on the important problem of how to evaluate generative models. As such, the results presented here should be applicable for other domains that use generative AI and require fast and faithful generation of samples in a large phase space.