Lauro Taques Neto, Letícia Maira Wambier, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski
{"title":"坚持使用漱口水治疗牙本质过敏的随机临床试验的CONSORT声明。","authors":"Lauro Taques Neto, Letícia Maira Wambier, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski","doi":"10.1007/s44445-025-00017-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Following the publication of the CONSORT statement, numerous dental journals have recommended its use for the reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). While numerous RCTs have been published assessing the efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for treating dentin hypersensitivity (DH), none of these studies have been evaluated for their quality using CONSORT guidelines. This study assessed RCTs investigating mouthwashes for DH treatment for adherence to CONSORT guidelines and their risk of bias. The databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from August to October 2024 for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of desensitizing mouthwashes. Adherence to CONSORT recommendations was evaluated using a specific tool, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 was employed to assess the individual quality of the included papers. Out of the 2,883 papers retrieved, 36 were included in the qualitative analysis. The mean overall CONSORT score was 23.3 ± 1.4, out of a maximum of 32 points. Intervention, outcomes, hypothesis testing, and effect size were the most comprehensively described elements. Meanwhile, settings and protocol registration were only described by 12.5% of the articles. Significant differences in CONSORT scores were identified based on journal and publication dates. Low risk of bias was identified in 14 studies, two papers were judged to have an unclear risk, and no articles showed a high risk of bias. Full adherence to CONSORT recommendations was not attained in the analyzed papers, but most of the papers had a low risk of bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":47246,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Dental Journal","volume":"37 7-9","pages":"49"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528558/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes.\",\"authors\":\"Lauro Taques Neto, Letícia Maira Wambier, Ana Cláudia Rodrigues Chibinski\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44445-025-00017-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Following the publication of the CONSORT statement, numerous dental journals have recommended its use for the reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). While numerous RCTs have been published assessing the efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for treating dentin hypersensitivity (DH), none of these studies have been evaluated for their quality using CONSORT guidelines. This study assessed RCTs investigating mouthwashes for DH treatment for adherence to CONSORT guidelines and their risk of bias. The databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from August to October 2024 for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of desensitizing mouthwashes. Adherence to CONSORT recommendations was evaluated using a specific tool, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 was employed to assess the individual quality of the included papers. Out of the 2,883 papers retrieved, 36 were included in the qualitative analysis. The mean overall CONSORT score was 23.3 ± 1.4, out of a maximum of 32 points. Intervention, outcomes, hypothesis testing, and effect size were the most comprehensively described elements. Meanwhile, settings and protocol registration were only described by 12.5% of the articles. Significant differences in CONSORT scores were identified based on journal and publication dates. Low risk of bias was identified in 14 studies, two papers were judged to have an unclear risk, and no articles showed a high risk of bias. Full adherence to CONSORT recommendations was not attained in the analyzed papers, but most of the papers had a low risk of bias.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"volume\":\"37 7-9\",\"pages\":\"49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528558/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Saudi Dental Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00017-y\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44445-025-00017-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
CONSORT声明发表后,许多牙科期刊推荐将其用于随机临床试验(rct)的报告。虽然已经发表了许多随机对照试验,评估脱敏漱口水治疗牙本质过敏(DH)的疗效,但这些研究都没有使用CONSORT指南对其质量进行评估。本研究评估了调查漱口水治疗DH是否符合CONSORT指南及其偏倚风险的随机对照试验。系统检索Cochrane Library、MEDLINE、Embase、BBO、LILACS、Scopus和Web of Science数据库,检索2024年8月至10月评估脱敏漱口水有效性的rct。对CONSORT建议的依从性使用特定工具进行评估,而Cochrane偏倚风险工具2用于评估纳入论文的个别质量。在检索到的2883篇论文中,有36篇被纳入定性分析。CONSORT的平均总分为23.3±1.4分,满分为32分。干预、结果、假设检验和效应大小是描述最全面的要素。同时,只有12.5%的文章描述了设置和协议注册。根据期刊和出版日期确定CONSORT得分的显著差异。有14篇研究被确定为低偏倚风险,2篇论文被判定为风险不明确,没有文章显示出高偏倚风险。在分析的论文中,没有完全遵守CONSORT建议,但大多数论文的偏倚风险较低。
Adherence to the CONSORT statement of randomized clinical trials on dentin hypersensitivity treatment using mouthwashes.
Following the publication of the CONSORT statement, numerous dental journals have recommended its use for the reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs). While numerous RCTs have been published assessing the efficacy of desensitizing mouthwashes for treating dentin hypersensitivity (DH), none of these studies have been evaluated for their quality using CONSORT guidelines. This study assessed RCTs investigating mouthwashes for DH treatment for adherence to CONSORT guidelines and their risk of bias. The databases of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, BBO, LILACS, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically searched from August to October 2024 for RCTs assessing the effectiveness of desensitizing mouthwashes. Adherence to CONSORT recommendations was evaluated using a specific tool, while the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2 was employed to assess the individual quality of the included papers. Out of the 2,883 papers retrieved, 36 were included in the qualitative analysis. The mean overall CONSORT score was 23.3 ± 1.4, out of a maximum of 32 points. Intervention, outcomes, hypothesis testing, and effect size were the most comprehensively described elements. Meanwhile, settings and protocol registration were only described by 12.5% of the articles. Significant differences in CONSORT scores were identified based on journal and publication dates. Low risk of bias was identified in 14 studies, two papers were judged to have an unclear risk, and no articles showed a high risk of bias. Full adherence to CONSORT recommendations was not attained in the analyzed papers, but most of the papers had a low risk of bias.
期刊介绍:
Saudi Dental Journal is an English language, peer-reviewed scholarly publication in the area of dentistry. Saudi Dental Journal publishes original research and reviews on, but not limited to: • dental disease • clinical trials • dental equipment • new and experimental techniques • epidemiology and oral health • restorative dentistry • periodontology • endodontology • prosthodontics • paediatric dentistry • orthodontics and dental education Saudi Dental Journal is the official publication of the Saudi Dental Society and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.