女性的性格特征是否会影响她们对宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项来自 rkiye样本的描述性相关研究。

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Gülşen Altuntaş Çalım, Semra Elmas
{"title":"女性的性格特征是否会影响她们对宫颈癌筛查的看法:一项来自<s:1> rkiye样本的描述性相关研究。","authors":"Gülşen Altuntaş Çalım, Semra Elmas","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-03489-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals' participation in preventive health practices may influenced by a variety of factors, including personality traits. This study aims to examine the relationship between women's personality traits and their health beliefs about cervical cancer and the Pap smear test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and correlational study involved 291 women from a vocational training center in Türkiye who met the criteria and consented to participate. Data were collected between August 20 and September 30, 2021 using the Personal Information Form, the Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test Health Belief Model Scale and the Five-Factor Personality Scale. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated significant associations between women's personality traits and their health beliefs. Extraversion showed positive correlations with perceived benefits (r = 0.267, p < 0.01), perceived barriers (r = 0.159, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.213, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.219, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.190, p < 0.01). Similarly, agreeableness was significantly related to perceived benefits (r = 0.186, p < 0.01), barriers (r = 0.168, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.245, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.191, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.061, p < 0.05). Self-control was linked to increased perceptions of benefits (r = 0.192, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.180, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.116, p < 0.05). Neuroticism also showed significant positive relationships with perceived benefits (r = 0.206, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.217, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.148, p < 0.05). Additionally, openness to experience was positively correlated with perceived benefits (r = 0.183, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.137, p < 0.05), and health motivation (r = 0.152, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of personality traits in shaping women's health beliefs regarding cervical cancer and screening behaviors. To improve preventive health practices and screening participation, health interventions should consider individual personality traits alongside health attitudes and beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"1141"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do women's personality traits influence their beliefs about cervical cancer screening: a descriptive-correlational study in a sample from Türkiye.\",\"authors\":\"Gülşen Altuntaş Çalım, Semra Elmas\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40359-025-03489-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals' participation in preventive health practices may influenced by a variety of factors, including personality traits. This study aims to examine the relationship between women's personality traits and their health beliefs about cervical cancer and the Pap smear test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This descriptive and correlational study involved 291 women from a vocational training center in Türkiye who met the criteria and consented to participate. Data were collected between August 20 and September 30, 2021 using the Personal Information Form, the Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test Health Belief Model Scale and the Five-Factor Personality Scale. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results demonstrated significant associations between women's personality traits and their health beliefs. Extraversion showed positive correlations with perceived benefits (r = 0.267, p < 0.01), perceived barriers (r = 0.159, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.213, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.219, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.190, p < 0.01). Similarly, agreeableness was significantly related to perceived benefits (r = 0.186, p < 0.01), barriers (r = 0.168, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.245, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.191, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.061, p < 0.05). Self-control was linked to increased perceptions of benefits (r = 0.192, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.180, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.116, p < 0.05). Neuroticism also showed significant positive relationships with perceived benefits (r = 0.206, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.217, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.148, p < 0.05). Additionally, openness to experience was positively correlated with perceived benefits (r = 0.183, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.137, p < 0.05), and health motivation (r = 0.152, p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings highlight the importance of personality traits in shaping women's health beliefs regarding cervical cancer and screening behaviors. To improve preventive health practices and screening participation, health interventions should consider individual personality traits alongside health attitudes and beliefs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37867,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03489-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-03489-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:个人参与预防保健实践可能受到多种因素的影响,包括人格特征。本研究旨在探讨女性人格特质与她们对子宫颈癌和子宫颈抹片检查的健康信念之间的关系。方法:这项描述性和相关性研究涉及来自基耶县职业培训中心的291名符合标准并同意参加的妇女。数据收集于2021年8月20日至9月30日,使用个人信息表、宫颈癌和巴氏涂片检查健康信念模型量表和五因素人格量表。采用均数、标准差、独立样本t检验、单因素方差分析、Pearson相关分析和卡方检验对数据进行分析。结果:研究结果表明,女性的人格特质与她们的健康信念之间存在显著的关联。结论:这些发现强调了人格特质在塑造女性对宫颈癌的健康信念和筛查行为方面的重要性。为了改进预防性保健做法和筛查参与,保健干预措施应考虑到个人的个性特征以及保健态度和信念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do women's personality traits influence their beliefs about cervical cancer screening: a descriptive-correlational study in a sample from Türkiye.

Background: Individuals' participation in preventive health practices may influenced by a variety of factors, including personality traits. This study aims to examine the relationship between women's personality traits and their health beliefs about cervical cancer and the Pap smear test.

Methods: This descriptive and correlational study involved 291 women from a vocational training center in Türkiye who met the criteria and consented to participate. Data were collected between August 20 and September 30, 2021 using the Personal Information Form, the Cervical Cancer and Pap Smear Test Health Belief Model Scale and the Five-Factor Personality Scale. The data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, One-Way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and chi-square tests.

Results: The results demonstrated significant associations between women's personality traits and their health beliefs. Extraversion showed positive correlations with perceived benefits (r = 0.267, p < 0.01), perceived barriers (r = 0.159, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.213, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.219, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.190, p < 0.01). Similarly, agreeableness was significantly related to perceived benefits (r = 0.186, p < 0.01), barriers (r = 0.168, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.245, p < 0.01), sensitivity (r = 0.191, p < 0.01), and health motivation (r = 0.061, p < 0.05). Self-control was linked to increased perceptions of benefits (r = 0.192, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.180, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.116, p < 0.05). Neuroticism also showed significant positive relationships with perceived benefits (r = 0.206, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.217, p < 0.01), and sensitivity (r = 0.148, p < 0.05). Additionally, openness to experience was positively correlated with perceived benefits (r = 0.183, p < 0.01), seriousness (r = 0.137, p < 0.05), and health motivation (r = 0.152, p < 0.01).

Conclusions: These findings highlight the importance of personality traits in shaping women's health beliefs regarding cervical cancer and screening behaviors. To improve preventive health practices and screening participation, health interventions should consider individual personality traits alongside health attitudes and beliefs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信