{"title":"在运动和运动医学期刊上发表的研究进展:全球趋势的定量分析。","authors":"Clara C Zwack, Milad Haghani, Amanda C Benson","doi":"10.1186/s40798-025-00839-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sports and exercise medicine is important in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of a variety of musculoskeletal presentations and injuries as well as aiding athletes' recovery and enhancing public health by promoting physical activity for all. It has evolved from a subspecialty into a distinct interdisciplinary domain. Using scientometric analysis, this study examines sports and exercise medicine's scope, history, current landscape and future directions. Utilising data from the Web of Science, covering 150,380 publications up to November 2022, trends from the early 1970s to 2022 are analysed.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>There was gradual growth in the field between 1980 and 2000 and a significant surge post-2000. The study reveals global distribution, with the United States contributing over half of the field's output. However, questions arise about international collaboration and resource allocation. Citespace analysis visualises 26 research streams in sports and exercise medicine, with many emerging around 2000, showcasing adaptability to trends. Document co-citation and citation burst analyses highlight pivotal moments in sports medicine's intellectual history and foundational knowledge. Semantic analysis categorises sports medicine into four primary divisions: Exercise, Lower limb injuries, Physical activity, and Biomechanics in sport, emphasising its multidisciplinary nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scientometric analysis highlights sports medicine's evolution into a diverse, interdisciplinary field, with significant growth since 2000. By identifying and mapping trends, global contributions, and key research themes (Exercise variables, Lower limb injuries, Sports dynamics, and Biomechanics) this study provides valuable insights for guiding collaboration, research, and resource allocation to advance athletes' well-being and health at a population level.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Sports and exercise medicine research has seen steady growth since the 1970s, with peaks in publication numbers, notably in 2020, followed by a decline attributed to changes in publication indexing practices. Analysis reveals a diverse array of 26 distinct research streams, evolving from a singular focus on anaerobic capacity to encompass modern topics like concussion management and sports psychology.</p>","PeriodicalId":21788,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine - Open","volume":"11 1","pages":"118"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528574/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evolution of Research Published in Sports and Exercise Medicine Journals: A Quantitative Analysis of Global Trends.\",\"authors\":\"Clara C Zwack, Milad Haghani, Amanda C Benson\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40798-025-00839-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sports and exercise medicine is important in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of a variety of musculoskeletal presentations and injuries as well as aiding athletes' recovery and enhancing public health by promoting physical activity for all. It has evolved from a subspecialty into a distinct interdisciplinary domain. Using scientometric analysis, this study examines sports and exercise medicine's scope, history, current landscape and future directions. Utilising data from the Web of Science, covering 150,380 publications up to November 2022, trends from the early 1970s to 2022 are analysed.</p><p><strong>Main findings: </strong>There was gradual growth in the field between 1980 and 2000 and a significant surge post-2000. The study reveals global distribution, with the United States contributing over half of the field's output. However, questions arise about international collaboration and resource allocation. Citespace analysis visualises 26 research streams in sports and exercise medicine, with many emerging around 2000, showcasing adaptability to trends. Document co-citation and citation burst analyses highlight pivotal moments in sports medicine's intellectual history and foundational knowledge. Semantic analysis categorises sports medicine into four primary divisions: Exercise, Lower limb injuries, Physical activity, and Biomechanics in sport, emphasising its multidisciplinary nature.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This scientometric analysis highlights sports medicine's evolution into a diverse, interdisciplinary field, with significant growth since 2000. By identifying and mapping trends, global contributions, and key research themes (Exercise variables, Lower limb injuries, Sports dynamics, and Biomechanics) this study provides valuable insights for guiding collaboration, research, and resource allocation to advance athletes' well-being and health at a population level.</p><p><strong>Key points: </strong>Sports and exercise medicine research has seen steady growth since the 1970s, with peaks in publication numbers, notably in 2020, followed by a decline attributed to changes in publication indexing practices. Analysis reveals a diverse array of 26 distinct research streams, evolving from a singular focus on anaerobic capacity to encompass modern topics like concussion management and sports psychology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528574/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports Medicine - Open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00839-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine - Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40798-025-00839-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:运动和运动医学在预防、诊断和管理各种肌肉骨骼疾病和损伤,以及帮助运动员恢复和通过促进所有人的体育活动来增强公众健康方面具有重要意义。它已经从一个亚专业发展成为一个独特的跨学科领域。本研究运用科学计量学分析,检视运动与运动医学的范围、历史、现况与未来方向。利用科学网(Web of Science)的数据,涵盖了截至2022年11月的150380份出版物,分析了从20世纪70年代初到2022年的趋势。主要发现:该领域在1980年至2000年期间逐渐增长,2000年之后出现显著增长。该研究揭示了全球分布,美国贡献了该领域一半以上的产量。然而,在国际合作和资源分配方面出现了问题。Citespace分析可视化了体育和运动医学的26个研究流,其中许多是在2000年左右出现的,显示出对趋势的适应性。文献共引和引文爆发分析突出了运动医学思想史和基础知识的关键时刻。语义分析将运动医学分为四个主要部分:运动,下肢损伤,身体活动和运动中的生物力学,强调其多学科性质。结论:这项科学计量学分析突出了运动医学自2000年以来发展成为一个多样化、跨学科的领域。通过识别和绘制趋势、全球贡献和关键研究主题(运动变量、下肢损伤、运动动力学和生物力学),本研究为指导协作、研究和资源分配提供了有价值的见解,从而在人群水平上提高运动员的福祉和健康。重点:自20世纪70年代以来,体育和运动医学研究稳步增长,出版物数量达到峰值,特别是在2020年,随后由于出版物索引实践的变化而下降。分析揭示了26个不同的研究流,从单一的关注无氧能力发展到包括脑震荡管理和运动心理学等现代主题。
Evolution of Research Published in Sports and Exercise Medicine Journals: A Quantitative Analysis of Global Trends.
Background: Sports and exercise medicine is important in the prevention, diagnosis, and management of a variety of musculoskeletal presentations and injuries as well as aiding athletes' recovery and enhancing public health by promoting physical activity for all. It has evolved from a subspecialty into a distinct interdisciplinary domain. Using scientometric analysis, this study examines sports and exercise medicine's scope, history, current landscape and future directions. Utilising data from the Web of Science, covering 150,380 publications up to November 2022, trends from the early 1970s to 2022 are analysed.
Main findings: There was gradual growth in the field between 1980 and 2000 and a significant surge post-2000. The study reveals global distribution, with the United States contributing over half of the field's output. However, questions arise about international collaboration and resource allocation. Citespace analysis visualises 26 research streams in sports and exercise medicine, with many emerging around 2000, showcasing adaptability to trends. Document co-citation and citation burst analyses highlight pivotal moments in sports medicine's intellectual history and foundational knowledge. Semantic analysis categorises sports medicine into four primary divisions: Exercise, Lower limb injuries, Physical activity, and Biomechanics in sport, emphasising its multidisciplinary nature.
Conclusions: This scientometric analysis highlights sports medicine's evolution into a diverse, interdisciplinary field, with significant growth since 2000. By identifying and mapping trends, global contributions, and key research themes (Exercise variables, Lower limb injuries, Sports dynamics, and Biomechanics) this study provides valuable insights for guiding collaboration, research, and resource allocation to advance athletes' well-being and health at a population level.
Key points: Sports and exercise medicine research has seen steady growth since the 1970s, with peaks in publication numbers, notably in 2020, followed by a decline attributed to changes in publication indexing practices. Analysis reveals a diverse array of 26 distinct research streams, evolving from a singular focus on anaerobic capacity to encompass modern topics like concussion management and sports psychology.