评估阿片类镇痛方案在重大创伤手术术后疼痛管理中的疗效。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Biao Xu, Yushun Duan, Deshun Yu, Panpan Jia
{"title":"评估阿片类镇痛方案在重大创伤手术术后疼痛管理中的疗效。","authors":"Biao Xu, Yushun Duan, Deshun Yu, Panpan Jia","doi":"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.13928.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols in postoperative pain management for major trauma surgeries. A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to either an opioid-sparing group or a conventional opioid-based group (n = 60 per group). Primary outcomes included pain severity, opioid use, and postoperative mobilization. The opioid-sparing group reported significantly lower pain scores at all time points (p < 0.0001) and lower sedation levels (p < 0.0001). Total opioid consumption was significantly reduced (p < 0.0001): and fewer rescue medications were required (p < 0.0001). Functional recovery was faster (p < 0.0001): patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of chronic pain was lower in the opioid-sparing group (2% vs 8%): and quality of life scores were higher (p < 0.0001). Additional multiple regression analysis determined the various predictors affecting long-term recovery results. These findings support the effectiveness of multimodal opioid-sparing strategies in enhancing recovery and reducing opioid-related complications after major trauma surgeries.</p>","PeriodicalId":19971,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","volume":"38 5","pages":"1974-1984"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols in postoperative pain management for major trauma surgeries.\",\"authors\":\"Biao Xu, Yushun Duan, Deshun Yu, Panpan Jia\",\"doi\":\"10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.13928.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols in postoperative pain management for major trauma surgeries. A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to either an opioid-sparing group or a conventional opioid-based group (n = 60 per group). Primary outcomes included pain severity, opioid use, and postoperative mobilization. The opioid-sparing group reported significantly lower pain scores at all time points (p < 0.0001) and lower sedation levels (p < 0.0001). Total opioid consumption was significantly reduced (p < 0.0001): and fewer rescue medications were required (p < 0.0001). Functional recovery was faster (p < 0.0001): patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of chronic pain was lower in the opioid-sparing group (2% vs 8%): and quality of life scores were higher (p < 0.0001). Additional multiple regression analysis determined the various predictors affecting long-term recovery results. These findings support the effectiveness of multimodal opioid-sparing strategies in enhancing recovery and reducing opioid-related complications after major trauma surgeries.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"volume\":\"38 5\",\"pages\":\"1974-1984\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.13928.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan journal of pharmaceutical sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36721/PJPS.2025.38.5.REG.13928.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项随机对照试验评估了阿片类镇痛方案在重大创伤手术术后疼痛管理中的疗效。共有120名患者被随机分配到阿片类药物保留组或传统阿片类药物组(每组n = 60)。主要结局包括疼痛严重程度、阿片类药物使用和术后活动。阿片类药物保留组在所有时间点的疼痛评分均显著降低(p < 0.0001),镇静水平也显著降低(p < 0.0001)。阿片类药物总消耗量显著降低(p < 0.0001),所需抢救药物减少(p < 0.0001)。功能恢复更快(p < 0.0001),患者满意度更高(p < 0.0001),住院时间更短(p < 0.0001)。在6个月的随访中,阿片类药物保留组的慢性疼痛发生率较低(2%对8%),生活质量评分较高(p < 0.0001)。附加的多元回归分析确定了影响长期恢复结果的各种预测因素。这些发现支持了多模式阿片类药物节约策略在促进重大创伤手术后恢复和减少阿片类药物相关并发症方面的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols in postoperative pain management for major trauma surgeries.

This randomized, controlled trial evaluated the efficacy of opioid-sparing analgesic protocols in postoperative pain management for major trauma surgeries. A total of 120 patients were randomly assigned to either an opioid-sparing group or a conventional opioid-based group (n = 60 per group). Primary outcomes included pain severity, opioid use, and postoperative mobilization. The opioid-sparing group reported significantly lower pain scores at all time points (p < 0.0001) and lower sedation levels (p < 0.0001). Total opioid consumption was significantly reduced (p < 0.0001): and fewer rescue medications were required (p < 0.0001). Functional recovery was faster (p < 0.0001): patient satisfaction was higher (p < 0.0001), and length of hospital stay was shorter (p < 0.0001). At 6-month follow-up, the incidence of chronic pain was lower in the opioid-sparing group (2% vs 8%): and quality of life scores were higher (p < 0.0001). Additional multiple regression analysis determined the various predictors affecting long-term recovery results. These findings support the effectiveness of multimodal opioid-sparing strategies in enhancing recovery and reducing opioid-related complications after major trauma surgeries.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Pakistan Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences (PJPS) is a peer reviewed multi-disciplinary pharmaceutical sciences journal. The PJPS had its origin in 1988 from the Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Karachi as a biannual journal, frequency converted as quarterly in 2005, and now PJPS is being published as bi-monthly from January 2013. PJPS covers Biological, Pharmaceutical and Medicinal Research (Drug Delivery, Pharmacy Management, Molecular Biology, Biochemical, Pharmacology, Pharmacokinetics, Phytochemical, Bio-analytical, Therapeutics, Biotechnology and research on nano particles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信