冬季长期使用阿奇霉素对支气管肺发育不良儿童医疗保健利用的影响:一项双盲随机对照研究(RCT)。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo
{"title":"冬季长期使用阿奇霉素对支气管肺发育不良儿童医疗保健利用的影响:一项双盲随机对照研究(RCT)。","authors":"Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02544984.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 10","pages":"e71314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Chronic Azithromycin Use in Winter on Health Care Utilization for Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study (RCT).\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.71314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02544984.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"e71314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:支气管肺发育不良(BPD)是早产儿的一种慢性肺部疾病,常导致感染引发的急性呼吸恶化。我们之前的小鼠研究表明,阿奇霉素的抗炎特性可能对病毒引起的呼吸系统疾病有预防作用。方法:在这项单中心双盲随机对照试验中,60名患有BPD的儿童(6个月至6岁)在一个冬季(10月至3月)接受阿奇霉素(5 mg/kg,每周3次;n = 30)或安慰剂(n = 30)治疗。主要结局是未安排的医疗保健诊所就诊、急诊室就诊和住院天数的总天数。次要结果包括门诊就诊、急诊就诊、住院次数、住院天数和不良事件。使用标准频率分析和贝叶斯分析。结果:主要结局、计划外医疗保健就诊(大环内酯14.9 vs 4.2 /儿童年;p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4)无显著差异,贝叶斯分析显示获益概率为11%;然而,高危儿童(因非医疗原因住院40天)。对于次要结局,我们观察到干预组急诊室就诊次数减少(每儿童年0.5次vs 1.3次;p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9)。住院天数增加(每个儿童年12.1天比1.2天;IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8)。结论:大环内酯预防并没有导致计划外医疗就诊天数的主要结局显著降低,但亚组分析表明,对高危儿童有潜在的益处,获益概率为82%。试验注册:NCT02544984。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The Effect of Chronic Azithromycin Use in Winter on Health Care Utilization for Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study (RCT).

The Effect of Chronic Azithromycin Use in Winter on Health Care Utilization for Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study (RCT).

Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.

Methods: In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.

Results: No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).

Conclusions: Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.

Trial registration: NCT02544984.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Pulmonology
Pediatric Pulmonology 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
12.90%
发文量
468
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases. PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信