Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo
{"title":"冬季长期使用阿奇霉素对支气管肺发育不良儿童医疗保健利用的影响:一项双盲随机对照研究(RCT)。","authors":"Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo","doi":"10.1002/ppul.71314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02544984.</p>","PeriodicalId":19932,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Pulmonology","volume":"60 10","pages":"e71314"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Chronic Azithromycin Use in Winter on Health Care Utilization for Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study (RCT).\",\"authors\":\"Ricardo A Mosquera, Aravind Yadav, Maria Del Mar Romero-Lopez, Ivan G Magana-Ceballos, S Shahrukh Hashmi, Wilfredo De Jesus Rojas, Maria E Tellez, Kaleigh Riggs-Harpur, Fatima M Boricha, Tina S Reddy, Janice L John, Tomika S Harris, Carlos E Rodriguez-Martinez, Jefferson Buendia, Katrina E McBeth, Cindy K Jon, James M Stark, Giuseppe N Colasurdo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ppul.71314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02544984.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"volume\":\"60 10\",\"pages\":\"e71314\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522027/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pediatric Pulmonology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71314\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Pulmonology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.71314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Effect of Chronic Azithromycin Use in Winter on Health Care Utilization for Children With Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Study (RCT).
Background: Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD), a chronic lung disease in preterm infants, often leads to acute respiratory exacerbations triggered by infections. Our previous mouse study suggested that azithromycin's anti-inflammatory properties may benefit virus-induced respiratory illnesses prophylactically.
Methods: In this single-center, double-blind RCT, 60 children (6 months to 6 years) with BPD received azithromycin (5 mg/kg three times weekly; n = 30) or placebo (n = 30) for one winter season (October to March). Primary outcome was the total number of days of unscheduled healthcare clinic visits, ER visits, and hospital days. Secondary outcomes comprised clinic visits, ER visits, hospital admissions, hospital days, and adverse events. Standard frequentist and Bayesian analyses were used.
Results: No significant difference in primary outcomes, unscheduled healthcare visits (macrolides 14.9 vs. 4.2 per child-year; p = 0.1, IRR = 2.1; 95% CI: 0.8-5.4), Bayesian analysis showing 11% probability of benefit; however, high-risk children (< 2 years, no tracheostomy), rates were lower with the macrolide group (2.7 vs. 4.6 per child-year; IRR = 0.6; 95% CI: 0.2-1.5), with an 82% probability of benefit. Two outliers in the macrolide group stayed > 40 days in the hospital for non-medical reasons. For secondary outcomes, we observe a decrease in the intervention group on ER visits (0.5 vs. 1.3 per child-year; p = 0.047, IRR = 0.4; 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). Hospital days increased (12.1 vs. 1.2 per child-year; IRR = 9.3; 95% CI: 5.5-16.8).
Conclusions: Macrolide prophylaxis did not lead to a significant reduction in the primary outcome of unscheduled healthcare encounter days, but subgroup analysis suggests a potential benefit in high-risk children, with 82% probability of benefit.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Pulmonology (PPUL) is the foremost global journal studying the respiratory system in disease and in health as it develops from intrauterine life though adolescence to adulthood. Combining explicit and informative analysis of clinical as well as basic scientific research, PPUL provides a look at the many facets of respiratory system disorders in infants and children, ranging from pathological anatomy, developmental issues, and pathophysiology to infectious disease, asthma, cystic fibrosis, and airborne toxins. Focused attention is given to the reporting of diagnostic and therapeutic methods for neonates, preschool children, and adolescents, the enduring effects of childhood respiratory diseases, and newly described infectious diseases.
PPUL concentrates on subject matters of crucial interest to specialists preparing for the Pediatric Subspecialty Examinations in the United States and other countries. With its attentive coverage and extensive clinical data, this journal is a principle source for pediatricians in practice and in training and a must have for all pediatric pulmonologists.