利用商业深度学习算法在计算机断层血管造影上回顾性检测漏出的颅内动脉瘤。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Tamer Sobeh, Shai Shrot, Mati Bakon, Gal Yaniv, David Orion, Eli Konen, Chen Hoffmann
{"title":"利用商业深度学习算法在计算机断层血管造影上回顾性检测漏出的颅内动脉瘤。","authors":"Tamer Sobeh, Shai Shrot, Mati Bakon, Gal Yaniv, David Orion, Eli Konen, Chen Hoffmann","doi":"10.1007/s00234-025-03810-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early identification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) enables risk stratification and the timely initiation of optimal management. This study aimed to identify patients with missed aneurysms for follow-up and possible treatment, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial deep learning algorithm in retrospectively detecting missed IAs on CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive head CTA studies of adult patients performed at a single referral center between February 18, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were retrospectively collected. A machine learning algorithm using natural language processing (NLP) classified radiology reports as positive or negative for aneurysms, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm analyzed the imaging data. Concordant results with the original reports were accepted as ground truth, while discordant cases were reviewed by three neuroradiologists, with majority voting determining the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,615 head CTA studies were analyzed. the algorithm flagged 34 suspected missed aneurysms, with 67% (23/34) confirmed as true positives by at least two neuroradiologists. This improved detection by 20.9% (23/110) or 0.88% of all studies. Most missed aneurysms were small (≤ 3 mm). There were 4 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.36%, specificity of 99.56%, positive predictive value of 90.6%, and negative predictive value of 99.84%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential of deep learning systems to detect missed intracranial aneurysms. Although the missed aneurysms in this cohort were predominantly small, follow-up or diagnostic digital subtraction angiography may still be warranted, depending on clinical characteristics and risk factors for aneurysm rupture.</p>","PeriodicalId":19422,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective detection of missed intra-cranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography using a commercial deep learning algorithm.\",\"authors\":\"Tamer Sobeh, Shai Shrot, Mati Bakon, Gal Yaniv, David Orion, Eli Konen, Chen Hoffmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00234-025-03810-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The early identification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) enables risk stratification and the timely initiation of optimal management. This study aimed to identify patients with missed aneurysms for follow-up and possible treatment, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial deep learning algorithm in retrospectively detecting missed IAs on CTA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All consecutive head CTA studies of adult patients performed at a single referral center between February 18, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were retrospectively collected. A machine learning algorithm using natural language processing (NLP) classified radiology reports as positive or negative for aneurysms, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm analyzed the imaging data. Concordant results with the original reports were accepted as ground truth, while discordant cases were reviewed by three neuroradiologists, with majority voting determining the reference standard.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,615 head CTA studies were analyzed. the algorithm flagged 34 suspected missed aneurysms, with 67% (23/34) confirmed as true positives by at least two neuroradiologists. This improved detection by 20.9% (23/110) or 0.88% of all studies. Most missed aneurysms were small (≤ 3 mm). There were 4 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.36%, specificity of 99.56%, positive predictive value of 90.6%, and negative predictive value of 99.84%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the potential of deep learning systems to detect missed intracranial aneurysms. Although the missed aneurysms in this cohort were predominantly small, follow-up or diagnostic digital subtraction angiography may still be warranted, depending on clinical characteristics and risk factors for aneurysm rupture.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19422,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuroradiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03810-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-025-03810-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颅内动脉瘤(IAs)的早期识别可以进行风险分层并及时开始最佳治疗。本研究旨在识别漏出动脉瘤的患者进行随访和可能的治疗,并评估商业深度学习算法在CTA上回顾性检测漏出动脉瘤的有效性。方法:回顾性收集2020年2月18日至2022年7月31日在单一转诊中心进行的所有连续成人患者头部CTA研究。使用自然语言处理(NLP)的机器学习算法将放射学报告分类为动脉瘤的阳性或阴性,卷积神经网络(CNN)算法分析成像数据。与原始报告一致的结果被接受为基本事实,而不一致的病例由三名神经放射学家审查,以多数投票决定参考标准。结果:共分析了2,615例头部CTA研究。该算法标记出34个疑似遗漏的动脉瘤,其中67%(23/34)被至少两名神经放射学家确认为真阳性。这提高了20.9%(23/110)或0.88%的所有研究的检出率。漏出的动脉瘤多为小动脉瘤(≤3mm)。假阴性4例,敏感性96.36%,特异性99.56%,阳性预测值90.6%,阴性预测值99.84%。结论:本研究强调了深度学习系统在检测颅内遗漏动脉瘤方面的潜力。虽然在这个队列中漏出的动脉瘤主要是小动脉瘤,但根据临床特征和动脉瘤破裂的危险因素,随访或诊断性数字减影血管造影仍然是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective detection of missed intra-cranial aneurysms on computed tomography angiography using a commercial deep learning algorithm.

Background: The early identification of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) enables risk stratification and the timely initiation of optimal management. This study aimed to identify patients with missed aneurysms for follow-up and possible treatment, and to evaluate the effectiveness of a commercial deep learning algorithm in retrospectively detecting missed IAs on CTA.

Methods: All consecutive head CTA studies of adult patients performed at a single referral center between February 18, 2020, and July 31, 2022, were retrospectively collected. A machine learning algorithm using natural language processing (NLP) classified radiology reports as positive or negative for aneurysms, and a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm analyzed the imaging data. Concordant results with the original reports were accepted as ground truth, while discordant cases were reviewed by three neuroradiologists, with majority voting determining the reference standard.

Results: A total of 2,615 head CTA studies were analyzed. the algorithm flagged 34 suspected missed aneurysms, with 67% (23/34) confirmed as true positives by at least two neuroradiologists. This improved detection by 20.9% (23/110) or 0.88% of all studies. Most missed aneurysms were small (≤ 3 mm). There were 4 false negatives, resulting in a sensitivity of 96.36%, specificity of 99.56%, positive predictive value of 90.6%, and negative predictive value of 99.84%.

Conclusion: This study highlights the potential of deep learning systems to detect missed intracranial aneurysms. Although the missed aneurysms in this cohort were predominantly small, follow-up or diagnostic digital subtraction angiography may still be warranted, depending on clinical characteristics and risk factors for aneurysm rupture.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology
Neuroradiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.60%
发文量
214
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neuroradiology aims to provide state-of-the-art medical and scientific information in the fields of Neuroradiology, Neurosciences, Neurology, Psychiatry, Neurosurgery, and related medical specialities. Neuroradiology as the official Journal of the European Society of Neuroradiology receives submissions from all parts of the world and publishes peer-reviewed original research, comprehensive reviews, educational papers, opinion papers, and short reports on exceptional clinical observations and new technical developments in the field of Neuroimaging and Neurointervention. The journal has subsections for Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Advanced Neuroimaging, Paediatric Neuroradiology, Head-Neck-ENT Radiology, Spine Neuroradiology, and for submissions from Japan. Neuroradiology aims to provide new knowledge about and insights into the function and pathology of the human nervous system that may help to better diagnose and treat nervous system diseases. Neuroradiology is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE core practices. Neuroradiology prefers articles that are free of bias, self-critical regarding limitations, transparent and clear in describing study participants, methods, and statistics, and short in presenting results. Before peer-review all submissions are automatically checked by iThenticate to assess for potential overlap in prior publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信