Anju Ranjit, Dorian S Odems, Alice Pressman, Mary A Garza, Miriam Kuppermann, Brittany D Chambers Butcher
{"title":"低收入孕妇在医疗环境中的歧视经验","authors":"Anju Ranjit, Dorian S Odems, Alice Pressman, Mary A Garza, Miriam Kuppermann, Brittany D Chambers Butcher","doi":"10.1007/s40615-025-02676-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) has been reported in several contexts; however, little is known about its prevalence in pregnant populations with low income.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a baseline cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in a randomized comparative-effectiveness trial of two forms of enhanced prenatal care among pregnant people in California's San Joaquin Valley with low incomes (the EMBRACE Study). We used the DMS Scale to assess participants' perceived discrimination in medical settings due to race, ethnicity, or color across their lifetime. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who had experienced DMS were compared to those of participants who did not report having experienced DMS, using chi-square tests. Predictors of DMS were identified using stepwise logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 652 participants were of color, identifying as Latine (71.9%), Black (7.2%), or another race/ethnicity (9.8%). Half (49.4%) reported having experienced DMS, with Black participants most likely (68.1%) and Latine participants least likely (44.1%) to report it. In adjusted analyses, Latine participants continued to be less likely to report DMS (aOR:0.48; CI:0.25-0.90), while participants with higher educational attainment (some college aOR:1.84; CI:1.19-2.83; college graduate aOR:2.96; CI:1.53-5.73) and who had experienced discrimination in community settings (aOR:2.98; CI:1.90-4.68) were more likely to have experienced DMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the high prevalence of DMS in a pregnant population with low income. This study adds to existing calls for providers to be mindful of patients' lifetime experiences in the community that may impact their perception of care in medical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of Discrimination in Medical Settings in a Pregnant Population with Low Income.\",\"authors\":\"Anju Ranjit, Dorian S Odems, Alice Pressman, Mary A Garza, Miriam Kuppermann, Brittany D Chambers Butcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40615-025-02676-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) has been reported in several contexts; however, little is known about its prevalence in pregnant populations with low income.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a baseline cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in a randomized comparative-effectiveness trial of two forms of enhanced prenatal care among pregnant people in California's San Joaquin Valley with low incomes (the EMBRACE Study). We used the DMS Scale to assess participants' perceived discrimination in medical settings due to race, ethnicity, or color across their lifetime. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who had experienced DMS were compared to those of participants who did not report having experienced DMS, using chi-square tests. Predictors of DMS were identified using stepwise logistic regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most of the 652 participants were of color, identifying as Latine (71.9%), Black (7.2%), or another race/ethnicity (9.8%). Half (49.4%) reported having experienced DMS, with Black participants most likely (68.1%) and Latine participants least likely (44.1%) to report it. In adjusted analyses, Latine participants continued to be less likely to report DMS (aOR:0.48; CI:0.25-0.90), while participants with higher educational attainment (some college aOR:1.84; CI:1.19-2.83; college graduate aOR:2.96; CI:1.53-5.73) and who had experienced discrimination in community settings (aOR:2.98; CI:1.90-4.68) were more likely to have experienced DMS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings highlight the high prevalence of DMS in a pregnant population with low income. This study adds to existing calls for providers to be mindful of patients' lifetime experiences in the community that may impact their perception of care in medical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02676-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-025-02676-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Experiences of Discrimination in Medical Settings in a Pregnant Population with Low Income.
Introduction: Discrimination in medical settings (DMS) has been reported in several contexts; however, little is known about its prevalence in pregnant populations with low income.
Methods: We conducted a baseline cross-sectional analysis of participants enrolled in a randomized comparative-effectiveness trial of two forms of enhanced prenatal care among pregnant people in California's San Joaquin Valley with low incomes (the EMBRACE Study). We used the DMS Scale to assess participants' perceived discrimination in medical settings due to race, ethnicity, or color across their lifetime. Demographic and clinical characteristics of participants who had experienced DMS were compared to those of participants who did not report having experienced DMS, using chi-square tests. Predictors of DMS were identified using stepwise logistic regression models.
Results: Most of the 652 participants were of color, identifying as Latine (71.9%), Black (7.2%), or another race/ethnicity (9.8%). Half (49.4%) reported having experienced DMS, with Black participants most likely (68.1%) and Latine participants least likely (44.1%) to report it. In adjusted analyses, Latine participants continued to be less likely to report DMS (aOR:0.48; CI:0.25-0.90), while participants with higher educational attainment (some college aOR:1.84; CI:1.19-2.83; college graduate aOR:2.96; CI:1.53-5.73) and who had experienced discrimination in community settings (aOR:2.98; CI:1.90-4.68) were more likely to have experienced DMS.
Conclusion: Our findings highlight the high prevalence of DMS in a pregnant population with low income. This study adds to existing calls for providers to be mindful of patients' lifetime experiences in the community that may impact their perception of care in medical settings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.