分数非烧蚀675 nm二极管激光与低通量高频Q开关1064 nm和YAG激光治疗黄褐斑的比较:一项劈裂面试验。

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Hadeer M Bassiony, Zakaria M Obaid, Shady M Ibrahim, Hany O Aboelwafa, Mohamed L Elsaie
{"title":"分数非烧蚀675 nm二极管激光与低通量高频Q开关1064 nm和YAG激光治疗黄褐斑的比较:一项劈裂面试验。","authors":"Hadeer M Bassiony, Zakaria M Obaid, Shady M Ibrahim, Hany O Aboelwafa, Mohamed L Elsaie","doi":"10.1007/s10103-025-04679-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Melasma is a chronic, relapsing pigmentary disorder that poses a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in individuals with darker skin types. Laser therapies have shown promise in targeting both epidermal and dermal melanin deposits. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser and Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of facial melasma using a split-face design. Thirty female patients with bilateral facial melasma were enrolled in a prospective, split-face trial. Each received five treatment sessions at two-week intervals: the right side with 675 nm diode laser and the left with 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), dermoscopic scoring, and post-therapy lightening grade at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Both modalities resulted in significant reductions in MASI and dermoscopic scores (p < 0.05). The 675 nm laser showed superior improvement, with a greater proportion of patients achieving excellent lightening. Adverse events were mild and transient. Fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser is more effective and equally safe compared to Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in treating facial melasma, offering a promising modality for patients with recalcitrant hyperpigmentation.</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":"40 1","pages":"434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fractional non ablative 675 nm diode laser versus low fluence high frequency Q- switched 1064 nm nd: YAG laser in the treatment of melasma: a comparative split face trial.\",\"authors\":\"Hadeer M Bassiony, Zakaria M Obaid, Shady M Ibrahim, Hany O Aboelwafa, Mohamed L Elsaie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10103-025-04679-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Melasma is a chronic, relapsing pigmentary disorder that poses a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in individuals with darker skin types. Laser therapies have shown promise in targeting both epidermal and dermal melanin deposits. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser and Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of facial melasma using a split-face design. Thirty female patients with bilateral facial melasma were enrolled in a prospective, split-face trial. Each received five treatment sessions at two-week intervals: the right side with 675 nm diode laser and the left with 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), dermoscopic scoring, and post-therapy lightening grade at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Both modalities resulted in significant reductions in MASI and dermoscopic scores (p < 0.05). The 675 nm laser showed superior improvement, with a greater proportion of patients achieving excellent lightening. Adverse events were mild and transient. Fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser is more effective and equally safe compared to Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in treating facial melasma, offering a promising modality for patients with recalcitrant hyperpigmentation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12528302/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lasers in Medical Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04679-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-025-04679-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

黄褐斑是一种慢性、复发性色素紊乱,对治疗提出了重大挑战,特别是对深色皮肤类型的个体。激光治疗在针对表皮和真皮黑色素沉积方面显示出希望。本研究旨在比较分式非烧蚀675 nm二极管激光器和调q 1064 nm Nd:YAG激光器在裂面设计治疗面部黄褐斑的疗效和安全性。30名患有双侧面部黄褐斑的女性患者参加了一项前瞻性的分脸试验。每组接受5次治疗,每隔两周进行一次:右侧为675 nm二极管激光,左侧为1064 nm调q Nd:YAG激光。临床疗效评估采用黄褐斑面积和严重程度指数(MASI),皮肤镜评分,治疗后减轻等级在基线和治疗后12周。两种治疗方式均显著降低MASI和皮肤镜评分(p < 0.05)。675 nm激光显示出更好的改善,更大比例的患者获得了良好的减轻。不良事件轻微且短暂。与调q 1064 nm Nd:YAG激光相比,分数阶非烧蚀675 nm二极管激光治疗面部黄褐斑更有效,同样安全,为顽固性色素沉着患者提供了一种有希望的治疗方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Fractional non ablative 675 nm diode laser versus low fluence high frequency Q- switched 1064 nm nd: YAG laser in the treatment of melasma: a comparative split face trial.

Fractional non ablative 675 nm diode laser versus low fluence high frequency Q- switched 1064 nm nd: YAG laser in the treatment of melasma: a comparative split face trial.

Fractional non ablative 675 nm diode laser versus low fluence high frequency Q- switched 1064 nm nd: YAG laser in the treatment of melasma: a comparative split face trial.

Fractional non ablative 675 nm diode laser versus low fluence high frequency Q- switched 1064 nm nd: YAG laser in the treatment of melasma: a comparative split face trial.

Melasma is a chronic, relapsing pigmentary disorder that poses a significant therapeutic challenge, particularly in individuals with darker skin types. Laser therapies have shown promise in targeting both epidermal and dermal melanin deposits. The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser and Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in the treatment of facial melasma using a split-face design. Thirty female patients with bilateral facial melasma were enrolled in a prospective, split-face trial. Each received five treatment sessions at two-week intervals: the right side with 675 nm diode laser and the left with 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser. Clinical efficacy was assessed using the Melasma Area and Severity Index (MASI), dermoscopic scoring, and post-therapy lightening grade at baseline and 12 weeks post-treatment. Both modalities resulted in significant reductions in MASI and dermoscopic scores (p < 0.05). The 675 nm laser showed superior improvement, with a greater proportion of patients achieving excellent lightening. Adverse events were mild and transient. Fractional non-ablative 675 nm diode laser is more effective and equally safe compared to Q-switched 1064 nm Nd:YAG laser in treating facial melasma, offering a promising modality for patients with recalcitrant hyperpigmentation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信