数字卫生干预措施的公平设计原则。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Laura Bitomsky, Marcia Nißen, Tobias Kowatsch
{"title":"数字卫生干预措施的公平设计原则。","authors":"Laura Bitomsky, Marcia Nißen, Tobias Kowatsch","doi":"10.1186/s12939-025-02645-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant progress in the past decade, health disparities persist. Digital health interventions (DHIs) offer a transformative opportunity to advance health equity but may also exacerbate the digital divide if equity considerations are not embedded from the onset. While there is broad consensus on the importance of equity-centered design, a critical gap re-mains in the form of actionable guidance for both research and practice. Thus, this study aims to develop equity by design principles for DHIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first synthesized existing scientific knowledge by assessing 42 articles/guidelines and formulated an initial set of 26 actionable, evidence-based design principles for DHIs (July through October 2024). We then conducted three semi-structured expert interviews to refine these principles (November 2024 through January 2025). We finally facilitated end-user workshops with two DHI providers to assess and finalize the design principles with respect to practical relevance and applicability (January through March 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 25 equity by design principles, 15 targeting DHIs, and 10 the organizational context in which DHIs are developed. The DHI-specific principles were categorized according to key process stages: needs assessment, design and development, implementation, and evaluation and dissemination. The organizational context principles were grouped into four domains: strategy, people, processes and structures, and partnerships and advocacy. We further challenged the principles real-world applicability, identifying three overarching challenges that hinder their successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the necessity of moving beyond DHI-specific design considerations to address health inequities in digital health. By adopting these design principles, digital health companies can embed equity as a core strategic priority, actively contribute to reducing health disparities, and foster a more inclusive healthcare ecosystem.</p>","PeriodicalId":13745,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Equity in Health","volume":"24 1","pages":"271"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522812/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Equity by design principles for digital health interventions.\",\"authors\":\"Laura Bitomsky, Marcia Nißen, Tobias Kowatsch\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12939-025-02645-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite significant progress in the past decade, health disparities persist. Digital health interventions (DHIs) offer a transformative opportunity to advance health equity but may also exacerbate the digital divide if equity considerations are not embedded from the onset. While there is broad consensus on the importance of equity-centered design, a critical gap re-mains in the form of actionable guidance for both research and practice. Thus, this study aims to develop equity by design principles for DHIs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We first synthesized existing scientific knowledge by assessing 42 articles/guidelines and formulated an initial set of 26 actionable, evidence-based design principles for DHIs (July through October 2024). We then conducted three semi-structured expert interviews to refine these principles (November 2024 through January 2025). We finally facilitated end-user workshops with two DHI providers to assess and finalize the design principles with respect to practical relevance and applicability (January through March 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 25 equity by design principles, 15 targeting DHIs, and 10 the organizational context in which DHIs are developed. The DHI-specific principles were categorized according to key process stages: needs assessment, design and development, implementation, and evaluation and dissemination. The organizational context principles were grouped into four domains: strategy, people, processes and structures, and partnerships and advocacy. We further challenged the principles real-world applicability, identifying three overarching challenges that hinder their successful implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study underscores the necessity of moving beyond DHI-specific design considerations to address health inequities in digital health. By adopting these design principles, digital health companies can embed equity as a core strategic priority, actively contribute to reducing health disparities, and foster a more inclusive healthcare ecosystem.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13745,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"271\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522812/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Equity in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02645-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Equity in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-025-02645-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管过去十年取得了重大进展,但健康差距仍然存在。数字卫生干预措施为促进卫生公平提供了变革性机会,但如果从一开始就不考虑公平因素,也可能加剧数字鸿沟。虽然对以公平为中心的设计的重要性有广泛的共识,但在研究和实践的可操作指导形式方面仍然存在重大差距。因此,本研究旨在通过设计原则来发展DHIs的公平性。方法:我们首先通过评估42篇文章/指南来综合现有的科学知识,并为DHIs(2024年7月至10月)制定了26项可操作的、基于证据的初步设计原则。然后我们进行了三次半结构化的专家访谈,以完善这些原则(2024年11月至2025年1月)。我们最终促成了两个DHI供应商的最终用户研讨会,以评估和最终确定设计原则的实际相关性和适用性(2025年1月至3月)。结果:我们通过设计原则确定了25项公平,15项针对ddi, 10项针对ddi开发的组织环境。dhi的具体原则根据关键过程阶段进行分类:需求评估、设计和开发、实施、评估和传播。组织环境原则分为四个领域:战略、人员、流程和结构、伙伴关系和宣传。我们进一步挑战了这些原则在现实世界中的适用性,确定了阻碍其成功实施的三个主要挑战。结论:该研究强调了超越dhi特定设计考虑的必要性,以解决数字卫生中的卫生不平等问题。通过采用这些设计原则,数字医疗公司可以将公平作为核心战略重点,积极为缩小健康差距做出贡献,并建立一个更具包容性的医疗生态系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Equity by design principles for digital health interventions.

Background: Despite significant progress in the past decade, health disparities persist. Digital health interventions (DHIs) offer a transformative opportunity to advance health equity but may also exacerbate the digital divide if equity considerations are not embedded from the onset. While there is broad consensus on the importance of equity-centered design, a critical gap re-mains in the form of actionable guidance for both research and practice. Thus, this study aims to develop equity by design principles for DHIs.

Methods: We first synthesized existing scientific knowledge by assessing 42 articles/guidelines and formulated an initial set of 26 actionable, evidence-based design principles for DHIs (July through October 2024). We then conducted three semi-structured expert interviews to refine these principles (November 2024 through January 2025). We finally facilitated end-user workshops with two DHI providers to assess and finalize the design principles with respect to practical relevance and applicability (January through March 2025).

Results: We identified 25 equity by design principles, 15 targeting DHIs, and 10 the organizational context in which DHIs are developed. The DHI-specific principles were categorized according to key process stages: needs assessment, design and development, implementation, and evaluation and dissemination. The organizational context principles were grouped into four domains: strategy, people, processes and structures, and partnerships and advocacy. We further challenged the principles real-world applicability, identifying three overarching challenges that hinder their successful implementation.

Conclusions: The study underscores the necessity of moving beyond DHI-specific design considerations to address health inequities in digital health. By adopting these design principles, digital health companies can embed equity as a core strategic priority, actively contribute to reducing health disparities, and foster a more inclusive healthcare ecosystem.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
162
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal for Equity in Health is an Open Access, peer-reviewed, online journal presenting evidence relevant to the search for, and attainment of, equity in health across and within countries. International Journal for Equity in Health aims to improve the understanding of issues that influence the health of populations. This includes the discussion of political, policy-related, economic, social and health services-related influences, particularly with regard to systematic differences in distributions of one or more aspects of health in population groups defined demographically, geographically, or socially.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信