桥接知识系统和观点告知鲑鱼管理和研究:库斯科温河案例研究。

IF 2.3 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Janessa Esquible, Avery Hoffman, Destiny Ropati, Brooke Woods, Jessica Black, Rachel Donkersloot, Mike Williams, Wilson Justin, Justin Leon, Carrie Stevens, Craig Chythlook, Tazia Wagner, Courtney Carothers
{"title":"桥接知识系统和观点告知鲑鱼管理和研究:库斯科温河案例研究。","authors":"Janessa Esquible,&nbsp;Avery Hoffman,&nbsp;Destiny Ropati,&nbsp;Brooke Woods,&nbsp;Jessica Black,&nbsp;Rachel Donkersloot,&nbsp;Mike Williams,&nbsp;Wilson Justin,&nbsp;Justin Leon,&nbsp;Carrie Stevens,&nbsp;Craig Chythlook,&nbsp;Tazia Wagner,&nbsp;Courtney Carothers","doi":"10.1002/ece3.72146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this research, we bridge knowledge systems and perspectives from Indigenous and rural fishers alongside state and federal managers and biologists regarding the state of salmon management and research processes in the Kuskokwim Region of southwestern Alaska. The key objectives were to identify strategies to improve salmon management, document perspectives on Alaska Native inclusion in current management and research processes, and illustrate ways to develop more inclusive management processes and organizations. We also identify key opportunities and barriers to relationship building between Tribes and management agencies. Lastly, we explore perceptions of equity and equality and how research and management account for these dimensions. This was a two-component research project, with one component being primarily Indigenous-led and community-engaged, and the second component involving agency management and research staff. We carried out 28 semi-directed interviews with 45 Indigenous and community knowledge holders across five different communities from June 2019 to May 2022, in addition to 12 interviews with state and federal managers and researchers in 2023. Our study revealed both key differences and shared understandings between state, federal, and community perspectives regarding salmon management and research and around agency inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge systems and Tribal governments. Shared visions and solutions for improving salmon management in southwestern Alaska and elsewhere reflect a greater need for community and Indigenous empowerment and inclusion in fisheries management and research, in addition to increased relationship building and agency time spent in communities. A key recommendation arising from this study is that trust and respect are precursors to meaningfully bridging knowledge systems. Our team encourages further investigation of current power and resource disparities that prohibit equitable knowledge sharing in fisheries management and research, while identifying broad solutions for improving the current salmon management system given diverse sharing across Indigenous, federal, and state experts.</p>","PeriodicalId":11467,"journal":{"name":"Ecology and Evolution","volume":"15 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516086/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging Knowledge Systems and Perspectives to Inform Salmon Management and Research: A Kuskokwim River Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Janessa Esquible,&nbsp;Avery Hoffman,&nbsp;Destiny Ropati,&nbsp;Brooke Woods,&nbsp;Jessica Black,&nbsp;Rachel Donkersloot,&nbsp;Mike Williams,&nbsp;Wilson Justin,&nbsp;Justin Leon,&nbsp;Carrie Stevens,&nbsp;Craig Chythlook,&nbsp;Tazia Wagner,&nbsp;Courtney Carothers\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ece3.72146\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this research, we bridge knowledge systems and perspectives from Indigenous and rural fishers alongside state and federal managers and biologists regarding the state of salmon management and research processes in the Kuskokwim Region of southwestern Alaska. The key objectives were to identify strategies to improve salmon management, document perspectives on Alaska Native inclusion in current management and research processes, and illustrate ways to develop more inclusive management processes and organizations. We also identify key opportunities and barriers to relationship building between Tribes and management agencies. Lastly, we explore perceptions of equity and equality and how research and management account for these dimensions. This was a two-component research project, with one component being primarily Indigenous-led and community-engaged, and the second component involving agency management and research staff. We carried out 28 semi-directed interviews with 45 Indigenous and community knowledge holders across five different communities from June 2019 to May 2022, in addition to 12 interviews with state and federal managers and researchers in 2023. Our study revealed both key differences and shared understandings between state, federal, and community perspectives regarding salmon management and research and around agency inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge systems and Tribal governments. Shared visions and solutions for improving salmon management in southwestern Alaska and elsewhere reflect a greater need for community and Indigenous empowerment and inclusion in fisheries management and research, in addition to increased relationship building and agency time spent in communities. A key recommendation arising from this study is that trust and respect are precursors to meaningfully bridging knowledge systems. Our team encourages further investigation of current power and resource disparities that prohibit equitable knowledge sharing in fisheries management and research, while identifying broad solutions for improving the current salmon management system given diverse sharing across Indigenous, federal, and state experts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"15 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12516086/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecology and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72146\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecology and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ece3.72146","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们将土著和农村渔民、州和联邦管理人员以及生物学家关于阿拉斯加西南部库斯科温地区鲑鱼管理和研究过程的知识体系和观点联系起来。主要目标是确定改善鲑鱼管理的策略,记录阿拉斯加原住民纳入当前管理和研究过程的观点,并说明开发更具包容性的管理流程和组织的方法。我们还确定了部落和管理机构之间建立关系的关键机会和障碍。最后,我们探讨了对公平和平等的看法,以及研究和管理如何解释这些方面。这是一个由两个部分组成的研究项目,其中一个部分主要由土著领导和社区参与,第二个部分涉及机构管理和研究人员。2019年6月至2022年5月,我们对五个不同社区的45名土著和社区知识持有人进行了28次半定向访谈,并在2023年对州和联邦管理人员和研究人员进行了12次访谈。我们的研究揭示了州、联邦和社区在鲑鱼管理和研究方面的主要差异和共同理解,以及围绕土著知识系统和部落政府的机构包容。在阿拉斯加西南部和其他地方,改善鲑鱼管理的共同愿景和解决方案反映出,除了增加关系建设和机构在社区投入的时间外,更需要在渔业管理和研究中赋予社区和土著权力和包容。这项研究提出的一个关键建议是,信任和尊重是有意义地连接知识系统的先决条件。我们的团队鼓励进一步调查目前的权力和资源差距,这些差距阻碍了渔业管理和研究中的公平知识共享,同时确定广泛的解决方案,以改善现有的鲑鱼管理系统,并在土著、联邦和州专家之间进行多样化的共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bridging Knowledge Systems and Perspectives to Inform Salmon Management and Research: A Kuskokwim River Case Study

Bridging Knowledge Systems and Perspectives to Inform Salmon Management and Research: A Kuskokwim River Case Study

In this research, we bridge knowledge systems and perspectives from Indigenous and rural fishers alongside state and federal managers and biologists regarding the state of salmon management and research processes in the Kuskokwim Region of southwestern Alaska. The key objectives were to identify strategies to improve salmon management, document perspectives on Alaska Native inclusion in current management and research processes, and illustrate ways to develop more inclusive management processes and organizations. We also identify key opportunities and barriers to relationship building between Tribes and management agencies. Lastly, we explore perceptions of equity and equality and how research and management account for these dimensions. This was a two-component research project, with one component being primarily Indigenous-led and community-engaged, and the second component involving agency management and research staff. We carried out 28 semi-directed interviews with 45 Indigenous and community knowledge holders across five different communities from June 2019 to May 2022, in addition to 12 interviews with state and federal managers and researchers in 2023. Our study revealed both key differences and shared understandings between state, federal, and community perspectives regarding salmon management and research and around agency inclusion of Indigenous Knowledge systems and Tribal governments. Shared visions and solutions for improving salmon management in southwestern Alaska and elsewhere reflect a greater need for community and Indigenous empowerment and inclusion in fisheries management and research, in addition to increased relationship building and agency time spent in communities. A key recommendation arising from this study is that trust and respect are precursors to meaningfully bridging knowledge systems. Our team encourages further investigation of current power and resource disparities that prohibit equitable knowledge sharing in fisheries management and research, while identifying broad solutions for improving the current salmon management system given diverse sharing across Indigenous, federal, and state experts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
1027
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Ecology and Evolution is the peer reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of research in all areas of ecology, evolution and conservation science. The journal gives priority to quality research reports, theoretical or empirical, that develop our understanding of organisms and their diversity, interactions between them, and the natural environment. Ecology and Evolution gives prompt and equal consideration to papers reporting theoretical, experimental, applied and descriptive work in terrestrial and aquatic environments. The journal will consider submissions across taxa in areas including but not limited to micro and macro ecological and evolutionary processes, characteristics of and interactions between individuals, populations, communities and the environment, physiological responses to environmental change, population genetics and phylogenetics, relatedness and kin selection, life histories, systematics and taxonomy, conservation genetics, extinction, speciation, adaption, behaviour, biodiversity, species abundance, macroecology, population and ecosystem dynamics, and conservation policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信