危重症脓毒症患者输血的实践。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Myung Jin Song, Woo-In Seo, Yeonhoon Jang, Sunghoon Park, RyoungEun Ko, Gee Young Suh, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Se Young Jung, Sung Yoon Lim
{"title":"危重症脓毒症患者输血的实践。","authors":"Myung Jin Song, Woo-In Seo, Yeonhoon Jang, Sunghoon Park, RyoungEun Ko, Gee Young Suh, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Se Young Jung, Sung Yoon Lim","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess real-world RBC transfusion practices during early resuscitation in sepsis and evaluate their association with 60-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational cohort (the Korean Sepsis Alliance cohort) from September 2019 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirteen ICUs across South Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (19 yr old or older) admitted to the ICU with sepsis were categorized into transfused and non-transfused groups based on whether they received RBC transfusions during ICU days 1-3.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 2613 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 13.3 yr old), 45.3% received RBC transfusions during the early resuscitation phase. The mean lowest hemoglobin level on the day of transfusion was 8.8 ± ;1.7 g/dL. RBC transfusion was associated with clinical factors beyond hemoglobin levels, including higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy scores, septic shock, surgical source control, elevated lactate and bilirubin levels, low platelet counts, the use of two or more vasopressors, and continuous renal replacement therapy. In the propensity score-matched cohort, there was no overall difference in 60-day mortality between groups. However, a significant qualitative interaction was observed when stratifying by an ICU day 1 hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL (p for interaction = 0.0124). RBC transfusion was linked to higher mortality at hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL, but showed a trend toward decreased mortality below this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RBC transfusions are common in critically ill patients with sepsis, highlighting a gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations. Although not associated with overall mortality, a qualitative interaction was observed at a hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL. Transfusion decisions may be guided by physiologic markers up to 9-10 g/dL, but should be avoided when hemoglobin levels exceed 10 g/dL due to the potential for harm.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"RBC Transfusion Practices in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis.\",\"authors\":\"Myung Jin Song, Woo-In Seo, Yeonhoon Jang, Sunghoon Park, RyoungEun Ko, Gee Young Suh, Dong Kyu Oh, Su Yeon Lee, Mi Hyeon Park, Chae-Man Lim, Se Young Jung, Sung Yoon Lim\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess real-world RBC transfusion practices during early resuscitation in sepsis and evaluate their association with 60-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational cohort (the Korean Sepsis Alliance cohort) from September 2019 to December 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Thirteen ICUs across South Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults (19 yr old or older) admitted to the ICU with sepsis were categorized into transfused and non-transfused groups based on whether they received RBC transfusions during ICU days 1-3.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Among 2613 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 13.3 yr old), 45.3% received RBC transfusions during the early resuscitation phase. The mean lowest hemoglobin level on the day of transfusion was 8.8 ± ;1.7 g/dL. RBC transfusion was associated with clinical factors beyond hemoglobin levels, including higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy scores, septic shock, surgical source control, elevated lactate and bilirubin levels, low platelet counts, the use of two or more vasopressors, and continuous renal replacement therapy. In the propensity score-matched cohort, there was no overall difference in 60-day mortality between groups. However, a significant qualitative interaction was observed when stratifying by an ICU day 1 hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL (p for interaction = 0.0124). RBC transfusion was linked to higher mortality at hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL, but showed a trend toward decreased mortality below this threshold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RBC transfusions are common in critically ill patients with sepsis, highlighting a gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations. Although not associated with overall mortality, a qualitative interaction was observed at a hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL. Transfusion decisions may be guided by physiologic markers up to 9-10 g/dL, but should be avoided when hemoglobin levels exceed 10 g/dL due to the potential for harm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006892\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估脓毒症早期复苏过程中真实世界的红细胞输血做法,并评估其与60天死亡率的关系。设计:对2019年9月至2022年12月的前瞻性多中心观察队列(韩国败血症联盟队列)进行二次分析。背景:遍布韩国的13个icu。患者:根据患者在ICU第1-3天是否接受红细胞输血,将脓毒症入住ICU的成人(19岁或以上)分为输血组和非输血组。干预措施:没有。测量结果和主要结果:2613例患者(平均年龄71.9±13.3岁)中,45.3%的患者在复苏早期接受了红细胞输注。输血当日平均最低血红蛋白水平为8.8±1.7 g/dL。红细胞输注与血红蛋白水平以外的临床因素相关,包括较高的简化急性生理评分3分和脓毒症诱导凝血功能评分、脓毒性休克、手术源控制、乳酸和胆红素水平升高、血小板计数低、使用两种或两种以上的血管加压药物以及持续的肾脏替代治疗。在倾向评分匹配的队列中,两组之间的60天死亡率没有总体差异。然而,当ICU第1天血红蛋白阈值为10 g/dL进行分层时,观察到显著的定性相互作用(相互作用p = 0.0124)。当血红蛋白大于或等于10 g/dL时,输血与较高的死亡率有关,但在此阈值以下死亡率呈下降趋势。结论:红细胞输注在重症脓毒症患者中很常见,这突出了临床实践与指南建议之间的差距。虽然与总死亡率无关,但在血红蛋白阈值为10 g/dL时观察到定性相互作用。输血决定可根据生理指标9- 10g /dL进行,但当血红蛋白水平超过10g /dL时应避免输血,因为存在潜在的危害。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
RBC Transfusion Practices in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis.

Objective: To assess real-world RBC transfusion practices during early resuscitation in sepsis and evaluate their association with 60-day mortality.

Design: Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter observational cohort (the Korean Sepsis Alliance cohort) from September 2019 to December 2022.

Setting: Thirteen ICUs across South Korea.

Patients: Adults (19 yr old or older) admitted to the ICU with sepsis were categorized into transfused and non-transfused groups based on whether they received RBC transfusions during ICU days 1-3.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Among 2613 patients (mean age 71.9 ± 13.3 yr old), 45.3% received RBC transfusions during the early resuscitation phase. The mean lowest hemoglobin level on the day of transfusion was 8.8 ± ;1.7 g/dL. RBC transfusion was associated with clinical factors beyond hemoglobin levels, including higher Simplified Acute Physiology Score 3 and Sepsis-Induced Coagulopathy scores, septic shock, surgical source control, elevated lactate and bilirubin levels, low platelet counts, the use of two or more vasopressors, and continuous renal replacement therapy. In the propensity score-matched cohort, there was no overall difference in 60-day mortality between groups. However, a significant qualitative interaction was observed when stratifying by an ICU day 1 hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL (p for interaction = 0.0124). RBC transfusion was linked to higher mortality at hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL, but showed a trend toward decreased mortality below this threshold.

Conclusions: RBC transfusions are common in critically ill patients with sepsis, highlighting a gap between clinical practice and guideline recommendations. Although not associated with overall mortality, a qualitative interaction was observed at a hemoglobin threshold of 10 g/dL. Transfusion decisions may be guided by physiologic markers up to 9-10 g/dL, but should be avoided when hemoglobin levels exceed 10 g/dL due to the potential for harm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信