老年社区获得性肺炎患者代谢综合征与预后的关系

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Xiaofeng Tang, Li Zhang, Ruijuan Wu, Jie Liu, Yongfeng Cheng
{"title":"老年社区获得性肺炎患者代谢综合征与预后的关系","authors":"Xiaofeng Tang, Li Zhang, Ruijuan Wu, Jie Liu, Yongfeng Cheng","doi":"10.1186/s12890-025-03914-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 712 elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) admitted with CAP to a tertiary hospital between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on MetS status (MetS group vs. non-MetS group). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 336 patients (168 MetS and 168 non-MetS) were included in the final analysis. The MetS group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate compared to the non-MetS group (29.8% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MetS was independently associated with a 1.98-fold increased risk of mortality (95% CI: 1.08-3.63; p = 0.03). A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with each additional MetS component increasing mortality risk by 1.46-fold (95% CI: 1.11-2.16; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MetS is an independent predictor of worse short-term outcomes in elderly CAP patients, including higher mortality and longer hospital stays. Early recognition and management of MetS may improve prognosis in this high-risk population.</p>","PeriodicalId":9148,"journal":{"name":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"469"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522349/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of metabolic syndrome and prognosis in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.\",\"authors\":\"Xiaofeng Tang, Li Zhang, Ruijuan Wu, Jie Liu, Yongfeng Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12890-025-03914-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 712 elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) admitted with CAP to a tertiary hospital between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on MetS status (MetS group vs. non-MetS group). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations, adjusting for confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After propensity score matching, 336 patients (168 MetS and 168 non-MetS) were included in the final analysis. The MetS group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate compared to the non-MetS group (29.8% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MetS was independently associated with a 1.98-fold increased risk of mortality (95% CI: 1.08-3.63; p = 0.03). A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with each additional MetS component increasing mortality risk by 1.46-fold (95% CI: 1.11-2.16; p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MetS is an independent predictor of worse short-term outcomes in elderly CAP patients, including higher mortality and longer hospital stays. Early recognition and management of MetS may improve prognosis in this high-risk population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"469\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12522349/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Pulmonary Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03914-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12890-025-03914-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本研究旨在评估老年社区获得性肺炎(CAP)住院患者代谢综合征(MetS)与临床结局的关系。方法:对某三级医院2018 - 2022年收治的712例老年CAP患者(年龄≥65岁)进行回顾性队列研究。根据MetS状态将患者分为两组(MetS组与非MetS组)。主要终点为90天全因死亡率。倾向评分匹配(PSM)用于平衡基线特征。采用多变量Cox回归和逻辑回归分析来评估相关性,调整混杂因素。结果:倾向评分匹配后,336例患者(168例MetS和168例非MetS)纳入最终分析。与非MetS组相比,MetS组的90天死亡率明显更高(29.8% vs 11.9%)。结论:MetS是老年CAP患者短期预后较差的独立预测因子,包括更高的死亡率和更长的住院时间。早期识别和管理MetS可能会改善这一高危人群的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association of metabolic syndrome and prognosis in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Association of metabolic syndrome and prognosis in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Association of metabolic syndrome and prognosis in elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia.

Background: This study aimed to evaluate the association between metabolic syndrome (MetS) and clinical outcomes in elderly patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 712 elderly patients (aged ≥ 65 years) admitted with CAP to a tertiary hospital between 2018 and 2022. Patients were stratified into two groups based on MetS status (MetS group vs. non-MetS group). The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance baseline characteristics. Multivariate Cox regression and logistic regression analyses were performed to assess associations, adjusting for confounders.

Results: After propensity score matching, 336 patients (168 MetS and 168 non-MetS) were included in the final analysis. The MetS group had a significantly higher 90-day mortality rate compared to the non-MetS group (29.8% vs. 11.9%, p < 0.01). Multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that MetS was independently associated with a 1.98-fold increased risk of mortality (95% CI: 1.08-3.63; p = 0.03). A clear dose-response relationship was observed, with each additional MetS component increasing mortality risk by 1.46-fold (95% CI: 1.11-2.16; p < 0.01).

Conclusion: MetS is an independent predictor of worse short-term outcomes in elderly CAP patients, including higher mortality and longer hospital stays. Early recognition and management of MetS may improve prognosis in this high-risk population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Pulmonary Medicine
BMC Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
423
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Pulmonary Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of pulmonary and associated disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信