Connor Drake, Sara Webb, Livia Anderson, Graham Cummin, Matthew Tucker, Amy Webster, Nina Sperber, Cynthia J Coffman, Natalie K FullenKamp, Leah L Zullig, Jaime M Hughes, Susan N Hastings, Courtney H Van Houtven, Lauren M Abbate, Helen Hoenig, Lindsay A Ballengee, Kelli D Allen
{"title":"门诊物理治疗诊所准备启动一项新的基于证据的膝关节骨关节炎临床项目的实施背景:一项全国性多地点实施试验的结果。","authors":"Connor Drake, Sara Webb, Livia Anderson, Graham Cummin, Matthew Tucker, Amy Webster, Nina Sperber, Cynthia J Coffman, Natalie K FullenKamp, Leah L Zullig, Jaime M Hughes, Susan N Hastings, Courtney H Van Houtven, Lauren M Abbate, Helen Hoenig, Lindsay A Ballengee, Kelli D Allen","doi":"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated implementation context to identify barriers and facilitators to delivering a new evidence-based clinical program, Group physical therapy (Group PT) for knee osteoarthritis, overall and by rurality and facility complexity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Baseline surveys from an implementation trial of Group PT.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient PT clinics (n=19) in the Veterans Health Administration.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Staff at Group PT sites (n=59).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Validated measures of implementation context included: organizational readiness to implement change (ORIC; score range 1-5), organizational resilience via the benchmark resilience tool (BRT; score range 8-32) and implementation climate scale (ICS; score range 0-4); surveys also included questions regarding anticipated challenging and helpful factors for implementing Group PT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores on the ORIC (4.6, SD=0.4) and BRT (26.2, SD=2.9) did not vary substantially by rurality or facility complexity. For the ICS, mean scores were lower for low complexity vs high complexity sites (2.0, SD=0.4 vs 2.6, SD=0.6) and lower for high rurality vs low rurality sites (1.9, SD=0.4 vs 2.5, SD=0.6). The most endorsed challenging factors were lack of experience implementing new programs (49%), staffing (47%) and patient awareness (45%). The most endorsed helpful factors were guidance on starting the program (96%), program effectiveness (96%) and staff resources (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on ORIC and BRT scores, staff perceived high levels of preparedness to implement Group PT, but they also identified specific factors that could make implementation challenging. Rural and low complexity sites reported lower levels of organizational prioritization for implementing evidence-based practices and may benefit from additional support.</p>","PeriodicalId":8313,"journal":{"name":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation context of outpatient physical therapy clinics preparing to launch a new evidence-based clinical program for knee osteoarthritis: Findings from a national multisite implementation trial.\",\"authors\":\"Connor Drake, Sara Webb, Livia Anderson, Graham Cummin, Matthew Tucker, Amy Webster, Nina Sperber, Cynthia J Coffman, Natalie K FullenKamp, Leah L Zullig, Jaime M Hughes, Susan N Hastings, Courtney H Van Houtven, Lauren M Abbate, Helen Hoenig, Lindsay A Ballengee, Kelli D Allen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We evaluated implementation context to identify barriers and facilitators to delivering a new evidence-based clinical program, Group physical therapy (Group PT) for knee osteoarthritis, overall and by rurality and facility complexity.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Baseline surveys from an implementation trial of Group PT.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Outpatient PT clinics (n=19) in the Veterans Health Administration.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Staff at Group PT sites (n=59).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Validated measures of implementation context included: organizational readiness to implement change (ORIC; score range 1-5), organizational resilience via the benchmark resilience tool (BRT; score range 8-32) and implementation climate scale (ICS; score range 0-4); surveys also included questions regarding anticipated challenging and helpful factors for implementing Group PT.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean scores on the ORIC (4.6, SD=0.4) and BRT (26.2, SD=2.9) did not vary substantially by rurality or facility complexity. For the ICS, mean scores were lower for low complexity vs high complexity sites (2.0, SD=0.4 vs 2.6, SD=0.6) and lower for high rurality vs low rurality sites (1.9, SD=0.4 vs 2.5, SD=0.6). The most endorsed challenging factors were lack of experience implementing new programs (49%), staffing (47%) and patient awareness (45%). The most endorsed helpful factors were guidance on starting the program (96%), program effectiveness (96%) and staff resources (93%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on ORIC and BRT scores, staff perceived high levels of preparedness to implement Group PT, but they also identified specific factors that could make implementation challenging. Rural and low complexity sites reported lower levels of organizational prioritization for implementing evidence-based practices and may benefit from additional support.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.032\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2025.09.032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们评估实施环境,以确定障碍和促进提供一个新的循证临床项目,小组物理治疗(小组PT)膝骨关节炎,整体和农村和设施的复杂性。设计:来自小组PT实施试验的基线调查。背景:退伍军人健康管理局门诊PT诊所(n=19)。参与者:小组PT站点的工作人员(n=59)。主要结果测量:实施环境的验证测量包括:组织实施变革的准备程度(ORIC,得分范围1-5),通过基准弹性工具(BRT,得分范围8-32)的组织弹性和实施气候量表(ICS,得分范围0-4);调查还包括关于实施小组pt的预期挑战和有益因素的问题。结果:ORIC (4.6, SD=0.4)和BRT (26.2, SD=2.9)的平均得分没有因乡村性或设施复杂性而发生实质性变化。对于ICS,低复杂性和高复杂性站点的平均得分较低(2.0,SD=0.4 vs 2.6, SD=0.6),高农村性和低农村性站点的平均得分较低(1.9,SD=0.4 vs 2.5, SD=0.6)。最具挑战性的因素是缺乏实施新方案的经验(49%),人员配备(47%)和患者意识(45%)。最受认可的有益因素是启动项目的指导(96%)、项目有效性(96%)和员工资源(93%)。结论:基于ORIC和BRT评分,员工认为实施小组PT的准备程度很高,但他们也确定了可能使实施具有挑战性的具体因素。农村地区和低复杂性地区报告说,实施循证实践的组织优先级较低,可能会从额外的支持中受益。
Implementation context of outpatient physical therapy clinics preparing to launch a new evidence-based clinical program for knee osteoarthritis: Findings from a national multisite implementation trial.
Objective: We evaluated implementation context to identify barriers and facilitators to delivering a new evidence-based clinical program, Group physical therapy (Group PT) for knee osteoarthritis, overall and by rurality and facility complexity.
Design: Baseline surveys from an implementation trial of Group PT.
Setting: Outpatient PT clinics (n=19) in the Veterans Health Administration.
Participants: Staff at Group PT sites (n=59).
Main outcome measures: Validated measures of implementation context included: organizational readiness to implement change (ORIC; score range 1-5), organizational resilience via the benchmark resilience tool (BRT; score range 8-32) and implementation climate scale (ICS; score range 0-4); surveys also included questions regarding anticipated challenging and helpful factors for implementing Group PT.
Results: Mean scores on the ORIC (4.6, SD=0.4) and BRT (26.2, SD=2.9) did not vary substantially by rurality or facility complexity. For the ICS, mean scores were lower for low complexity vs high complexity sites (2.0, SD=0.4 vs 2.6, SD=0.6) and lower for high rurality vs low rurality sites (1.9, SD=0.4 vs 2.5, SD=0.6). The most endorsed challenging factors were lack of experience implementing new programs (49%), staffing (47%) and patient awareness (45%). The most endorsed helpful factors were guidance on starting the program (96%), program effectiveness (96%) and staff resources (93%).
Conclusions: Based on ORIC and BRT scores, staff perceived high levels of preparedness to implement Group PT, but they also identified specific factors that could make implementation challenging. Rural and low complexity sites reported lower levels of organizational prioritization for implementing evidence-based practices and may benefit from additional support.
期刊介绍:
The Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation publishes original, peer-reviewed research and clinical reports on important trends and developments in physical medicine and rehabilitation and related fields. This international journal brings researchers and clinicians authoritative information on the therapeutic utilization of physical, behavioral and pharmaceutical agents in providing comprehensive care for individuals with chronic illness and disabilities.
Archives began publication in 1920, publishes monthly, and is the official journal of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Its papers are cited more often than any other rehabilitation journal.