III期黑色素瘤新辅助全身治疗后淋巴结手术证据的国际调查。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Elan Novis, Mervi Rautalin, Rodabe N Amaria, Paolo A Ascierto, Christian U Blank, Mark B Faries, Dirk J Grunhagen, David E Gyorki, Andrew J Hayes, Anke M J Kuijpers, Georgina V Long, Joshua M V Mammen, Alexander M Menzies, Merrick I Ross, Piotr Rutkowski, Hussein A Tawbi, Michael T Tetzlaff, Jonathan S Zager, Jennifer A Wargo, Tina J Hieken, Alexander C J van Akkooi
{"title":"III期黑色素瘤新辅助全身治疗后淋巴结手术证据的国际调查。","authors":"Elan Novis, Mervi Rautalin, Rodabe N Amaria, Paolo A Ascierto, Christian U Blank, Mark B Faries, Dirk J Grunhagen, David E Gyorki, Andrew J Hayes, Anke M J Kuijpers, Georgina V Long, Joshua M V Mammen, Alexander M Menzies, Merrick I Ross, Piotr Rutkowski, Hussein A Tawbi, Michael T Tetzlaff, Jonathan S Zager, Jennifer A Wargo, Tina J Hieken, Alexander C J van Akkooi","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18475-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage III melanoma has demonstrated promising outcomes in recent trials, prompting a change in clinical practice in many countries. Although therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) remains the standard of care after neoadjuvant treatment, a less invasive index lymph node (ILN)-guided approach has been proposed. The global melanoma community's acceptance of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the need for TLND or ILN after this remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage international survey was conducted among melanoma experts between May 2023 and January 2025. Respondents were asked about their familiarity with neoadjuvant trials, current practices, and opinions on ILN versus TLND before and after publication of the NADINA trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rates were 50% (118/237) in the first survey and 62% (148/237) in the second survey. In the second survey, 74% of the respondents considered neoadjuvant therapy the standard of care, and support for ILN-guided surgery rose from 27 to 40% between the surveys. However, 54% still favored a phase 3 randomized controlled trial before changing the clinical practice guidelines, and only 27% believed the current data were sufficient for adoption of ILN as standard. Key barriers included concerns about oncologic safety, pathologic standardization, and patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for stage III melanoma. However, widespread clinical adoption of ILN-guided surgical de-escalation remains limited. A multicenter phase 3 trial (MSLT-3), launching in 2025, is expected to provide important data to guide future practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"International Survey on Evidence for Index Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Stage III Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"Elan Novis, Mervi Rautalin, Rodabe N Amaria, Paolo A Ascierto, Christian U Blank, Mark B Faries, Dirk J Grunhagen, David E Gyorki, Andrew J Hayes, Anke M J Kuijpers, Georgina V Long, Joshua M V Mammen, Alexander M Menzies, Merrick I Ross, Piotr Rutkowski, Hussein A Tawbi, Michael T Tetzlaff, Jonathan S Zager, Jennifer A Wargo, Tina J Hieken, Alexander C J van Akkooi\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18475-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage III melanoma has demonstrated promising outcomes in recent trials, prompting a change in clinical practice in many countries. Although therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) remains the standard of care after neoadjuvant treatment, a less invasive index lymph node (ILN)-guided approach has been proposed. The global melanoma community's acceptance of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the need for TLND or ILN after this remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-stage international survey was conducted among melanoma experts between May 2023 and January 2025. Respondents were asked about their familiarity with neoadjuvant trials, current practices, and opinions on ILN versus TLND before and after publication of the NADINA trial.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rates were 50% (118/237) in the first survey and 62% (148/237) in the second survey. In the second survey, 74% of the respondents considered neoadjuvant therapy the standard of care, and support for ILN-guided surgery rose from 27 to 40% between the surveys. However, 54% still favored a phase 3 randomized controlled trial before changing the clinical practice guidelines, and only 27% believed the current data were sufficient for adoption of ILN as standard. Key barriers included concerns about oncologic safety, pathologic standardization, and patient selection.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The current evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for stage III melanoma. However, widespread clinical adoption of ILN-guided surgical de-escalation remains limited. A multicenter phase 3 trial (MSLT-3), launching in 2025, is expected to provide important data to guide future practice.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18475-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18475-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在最近的试验中,可切除的III期黑色素瘤的新辅助免疫治疗显示出有希望的结果,促使许多国家的临床实践发生了变化。虽然治疗性淋巴结清扫(TLND)仍然是新辅助治疗后的标准治疗方法,但已经提出了一种侵入性较小的指数淋巴结(ILN)引导方法。全球黑色素瘤社区对新辅助免疫治疗的接受程度以及在此之后是否需要TLND或ILN仍不清楚。方法:在2023年5月至2025年1月期间,对黑色素瘤专家进行了两阶段的国际调查。受访者被问及他们对新辅助试验的熟悉程度,当前的做法,以及在NADINA试验发表前后对ILN与TLND的看法。结果:第一次调查有效率为50%(118/237),第二次调查有效率为62%(148/237)。在第二次调查中,74%的受访者认为新辅助治疗是标准的治疗方法,在两次调查中,对il - n引导手术的支持率从27%上升到40%。然而,54%的人仍然赞成在改变临床实践指南之前进行3期随机对照试验,只有27%的人认为目前的数据足以采用ILN作为标准。主要障碍包括肿瘤安全性、病理标准化和患者选择。结论:目前的证据支持使用新辅助免疫治疗作为III期黑色素瘤的标准治疗。然而,临床广泛采用il - n引导的手术降级仍然有限。一项多中心三期试验(MSLT-3)将于2025年启动,预计将为指导未来的实践提供重要数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
International Survey on Evidence for Index Lymph Node Surgery After Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy for Stage III Melanoma.

Background: Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for resectable stage III melanoma has demonstrated promising outcomes in recent trials, prompting a change in clinical practice in many countries. Although therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) remains the standard of care after neoadjuvant treatment, a less invasive index lymph node (ILN)-guided approach has been proposed. The global melanoma community's acceptance of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and the need for TLND or ILN after this remains unclear.

Methods: A two-stage international survey was conducted among melanoma experts between May 2023 and January 2025. Respondents were asked about their familiarity with neoadjuvant trials, current practices, and opinions on ILN versus TLND before and after publication of the NADINA trial.

Results: The response rates were 50% (118/237) in the first survey and 62% (148/237) in the second survey. In the second survey, 74% of the respondents considered neoadjuvant therapy the standard of care, and support for ILN-guided surgery rose from 27 to 40% between the surveys. However, 54% still favored a phase 3 randomized controlled trial before changing the clinical practice guidelines, and only 27% believed the current data were sufficient for adoption of ILN as standard. Key barriers included concerns about oncologic safety, pathologic standardization, and patient selection.

Conclusion: The current evidence supports the use of neoadjuvant immunotherapy as the standard of care for stage III melanoma. However, widespread clinical adoption of ILN-guided surgical de-escalation remains limited. A multicenter phase 3 trial (MSLT-3), launching in 2025, is expected to provide important data to guide future practice.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信