Cheon-Hoo Jun, Si-Ho Kim, Hyoung Tae Kim, Yu Mi Wi
{"title":"直接粪便Xpert碳- r测定在产碳青霉烯酶肠杆菌活性监测中的诊断性能。","authors":"Cheon-Hoo Jun, Si-Ho Kim, Hyoung Tae Kim, Yu Mi Wi","doi":"10.1186/s13756-025-01642-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Xpert Carba-R assay allows direct identification of major carbapenemase genes from stools, offering faster results than culture-based methods. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for detecting CPE colonization and assess gene-level concordance between direct stool and cultured samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and December 2023, two rectal swabs were collected from high-risk patients, those admitted to the intensive care unit or with prior hospitalization-at a tertiary care hospital. One swab was analyzed using the direct stool Xpert Carba-R assay, and the other underwent conventional culture techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against culture-based detection, and concordance of carbapenemase gene identification between direct stool and culture isolate results was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,120 screened patients, 107 (2.5%) were colonized with CPE. The direct stool Xpert assay showed a sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 99.1% for CPE detection. Concordance analysis showed an overall agreement of 64.1% (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.456). Discordance occurred in 52 cases (35.9%), primarily due to multiple gene detections in direct stool samples that were not confirmed in cultural isolates. The positive predictive value varied significantly by gene: bla<sub>KPC</sub> showed 90.8%, bla<sub>NDM</sub> 52.6%, bla<sub>OXA-48</sub> 50.0%, while bla<sub>IMP-1</sub> showed 0%, with none of the nine bla<sub>IMP-1</sub> detections from stool samples confirmed in corresponding cultured isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Xpert Carba-R assay is a reliable tool for direct CPE detection from stool samples, though discordance with culture-based testing, particularly for bla<sub>IMP-1</sub>-should be considered in clinical interpretation.</p>","PeriodicalId":7950,"journal":{"name":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","volume":"14 1","pages":"121"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523156/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic performance of the direct stool Xpert Carba-R assay in active surveillance of carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales.\",\"authors\":\"Cheon-Hoo Jun, Si-Ho Kim, Hyoung Tae Kim, Yu Mi Wi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13756-025-01642-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Xpert Carba-R assay allows direct identification of major carbapenemase genes from stools, offering faster results than culture-based methods. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for detecting CPE colonization and assess gene-level concordance between direct stool and cultured samples.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between March and December 2023, two rectal swabs were collected from high-risk patients, those admitted to the intensive care unit or with prior hospitalization-at a tertiary care hospital. One swab was analyzed using the direct stool Xpert Carba-R assay, and the other underwent conventional culture techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against culture-based detection, and concordance of carbapenemase gene identification between direct stool and culture isolate results was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 4,120 screened patients, 107 (2.5%) were colonized with CPE. The direct stool Xpert assay showed a sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 99.1% for CPE detection. Concordance analysis showed an overall agreement of 64.1% (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.456). Discordance occurred in 52 cases (35.9%), primarily due to multiple gene detections in direct stool samples that were not confirmed in cultural isolates. The positive predictive value varied significantly by gene: bla<sub>KPC</sub> showed 90.8%, bla<sub>NDM</sub> 52.6%, bla<sub>OXA-48</sub> 50.0%, while bla<sub>IMP-1</sub> showed 0%, with none of the nine bla<sub>IMP-1</sub> detections from stool samples confirmed in corresponding cultured isolates.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Xpert Carba-R assay is a reliable tool for direct CPE detection from stool samples, though discordance with culture-based testing, particularly for bla<sub>IMP-1</sub>-should be considered in clinical interpretation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7950,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"121\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12523156/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01642-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13756-025-01642-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic performance of the direct stool Xpert Carba-R assay in active surveillance of carbapenemase-producing enterobacterales.
Background: The Xpert Carba-R assay allows direct identification of major carbapenemase genes from stools, offering faster results than culture-based methods. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Xpert Carba-R assay for detecting CPE colonization and assess gene-level concordance between direct stool and cultured samples.
Methods: Between March and December 2023, two rectal swabs were collected from high-risk patients, those admitted to the intensive care unit or with prior hospitalization-at a tertiary care hospital. One swab was analyzed using the direct stool Xpert Carba-R assay, and the other underwent conventional culture techniques. Diagnostic performance was evaluated against culture-based detection, and concordance of carbapenemase gene identification between direct stool and culture isolate results was assessed.
Results: Among 4,120 screened patients, 107 (2.5%) were colonized with CPE. The direct stool Xpert assay showed a sensitivity of 97.2% and specificity of 99.1% for CPE detection. Concordance analysis showed an overall agreement of 64.1% (Cohen's kappa coefficient = 0.456). Discordance occurred in 52 cases (35.9%), primarily due to multiple gene detections in direct stool samples that were not confirmed in cultural isolates. The positive predictive value varied significantly by gene: blaKPC showed 90.8%, blaNDM 52.6%, blaOXA-48 50.0%, while blaIMP-1 showed 0%, with none of the nine blaIMP-1 detections from stool samples confirmed in corresponding cultured isolates.
Conclusion: The Xpert Carba-R assay is a reliable tool for direct CPE detection from stool samples, though discordance with culture-based testing, particularly for blaIMP-1-should be considered in clinical interpretation.
期刊介绍:
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control is a global forum for all those working on the prevention, diagnostic and treatment of health-care associated infections and antimicrobial resistance development in all health-care settings. The journal covers a broad spectrum of preeminent practices and best available data to the top interventional and translational research, and innovative developments in the field of infection control.