气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法分析多氯二苯并对二恶英、二苯并呋喃:评价及在沉积物样品中的应用。

IF 3.8 2区 化学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Xuyen Thi Nguyen, Hang Thi Hong Mai, Anh Duc Dam, Dat Tien Nguyen, Minh Binh Tu, Binh Dinh Chu, Nam Duc Vu
{"title":"气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱法分析多氯二苯并对二恶英、二苯并呋喃:评价及在沉积物样品中的应用。","authors":"Xuyen Thi Nguyen, Hang Thi Hong Mai, Anh Duc Dam, Dat Tien Nguyen, Minh Binh Tu, Binh Dinh Chu, Nam Duc Vu","doi":"10.1007/s00216-025-06129-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A study was conducted to validate the gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-QqQ-MS) method as a cost-effective method for the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in sediment samples. The instrument sensitivity for 17 PCDD/Fs congeners was determined to be in the range of 0.201 to 1.45 ng/mL. The four-point calibration curve exhibited high linearity, with the mean relative response factors (RRFs) for PCDD/Fs ranging from 0.81 to 1.88, and RSD < 20% met the analytical requirements of the standard method for gas chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). The quantification limit of PCDD/Fs in sediments analyzed by the GC-QqQ-MS method was demonstrated to be 2 to 21 times higher than that of the GC-HRMS method. The results of PCDD/Fs concentration analysis in sediment matrix for 1 certified reference material sample, 3 international proficiency test samples, and 29 marine sediment samples between the two analytical methods showed a relatively good agreement, with a relative difference of ± 25%. Furthermore, the gas chromatography method using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry can be regarded as a viable alternative to high-resolution mass spectrometry for sediment samples with total mass concentrations of PCDD/Fs in the 500-1000 pg/g range, and especially areas at risk of PCDD/Fs contamination.</p>","PeriodicalId":462,"journal":{"name":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method for analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans: evaluation and application to sediment samples.\",\"authors\":\"Xuyen Thi Nguyen, Hang Thi Hong Mai, Anh Duc Dam, Dat Tien Nguyen, Minh Binh Tu, Binh Dinh Chu, Nam Duc Vu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00216-025-06129-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A study was conducted to validate the gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-QqQ-MS) method as a cost-effective method for the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in sediment samples. The instrument sensitivity for 17 PCDD/Fs congeners was determined to be in the range of 0.201 to 1.45 ng/mL. The four-point calibration curve exhibited high linearity, with the mean relative response factors (RRFs) for PCDD/Fs ranging from 0.81 to 1.88, and RSD < 20% met the analytical requirements of the standard method for gas chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). The quantification limit of PCDD/Fs in sediments analyzed by the GC-QqQ-MS method was demonstrated to be 2 to 21 times higher than that of the GC-HRMS method. The results of PCDD/Fs concentration analysis in sediment matrix for 1 certified reference material sample, 3 international proficiency test samples, and 29 marine sediment samples between the two analytical methods showed a relatively good agreement, with a relative difference of ± 25%. Furthermore, the gas chromatography method using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry can be regarded as a viable alternative to high-resolution mass spectrometry for sediment samples with total mass concentrations of PCDD/Fs in the 500-1000 pg/g range, and especially areas at risk of PCDD/Fs contamination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-06129-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-025-06129-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究了气相色谱-三重四极杆质谱(GC-QqQ-MS)分析沉积物样品中多氯二苯并对二恶英/二苯并呋喃(PCDD/Fs)的成本效益。仪器对17种PCDD/Fs同系物的灵敏度范围为0.201 ~ 1.45 ng/mL。4点校准曲线线性度高,PCDD/Fs的平均相对响应因子(RRFs)在0.81 ~ 1.88之间,RSD在0.81 ~ 1.88之间
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry method for analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans: evaluation and application to sediment samples.

A study was conducted to validate the gas chromatography-triple quadrupole mass spectrometry (GC-QqQ-MS) method as a cost-effective method for the analysis of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins/dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs) in sediment samples. The instrument sensitivity for 17 PCDD/Fs congeners was determined to be in the range of 0.201 to 1.45 ng/mL. The four-point calibration curve exhibited high linearity, with the mean relative response factors (RRFs) for PCDD/Fs ranging from 0.81 to 1.88, and RSD < 20% met the analytical requirements of the standard method for gas chromatography combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry (GC-HRMS). The quantification limit of PCDD/Fs in sediments analyzed by the GC-QqQ-MS method was demonstrated to be 2 to 21 times higher than that of the GC-HRMS method. The results of PCDD/Fs concentration analysis in sediment matrix for 1 certified reference material sample, 3 international proficiency test samples, and 29 marine sediment samples between the two analytical methods showed a relatively good agreement, with a relative difference of ± 25%. Furthermore, the gas chromatography method using triple quadrupole mass spectrometry can be regarded as a viable alternative to high-resolution mass spectrometry for sediment samples with total mass concentrations of PCDD/Fs in the 500-1000 pg/g range, and especially areas at risk of PCDD/Fs contamination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
638
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry’s mission is the rapid publication of excellent and high-impact research articles on fundamental and applied topics of analytical and bioanalytical measurement science. Its scope is broad, and ranges from novel measurement platforms and their characterization to multidisciplinary approaches that effectively address important scientific problems. The Editors encourage submissions presenting innovative analytical research in concept, instrumentation, methods, and/or applications, including: mass spectrometry, spectroscopy, and electroanalysis; advanced separations; analytical strategies in “-omics” and imaging, bioanalysis, and sampling; miniaturized devices, medical diagnostics, sensors; analytical characterization of nano- and biomaterials; chemometrics and advanced data analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信