评估男性抗兴奋剂血清样本中睾酮和黄体生成素的比例:来自经皮睾酮给药试验和现场采集样本的结果。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS
Jenna M Goodrum, Vinod S Nair, Andre K Crouch, Daniel Eichner, Geoffrey D Miller
{"title":"评估男性抗兴奋剂血清样本中睾酮和黄体生成素的比例:来自经皮睾酮给药试验和现场采集样本的结果。","authors":"Jenna M Goodrum, Vinod S Nair, Andre K Crouch, Daniel Eichner, Geoffrey D Miller","doi":"10.1002/dta.3959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The serum testosterone-to-luteinizing hormone (T/LH) ratio has previously been suggested as a sensitive marker of testosterone use in an anti-doping setting. When measured with an automated immunoassay platform, this ratio represents a quick and cost-effective screening biomarker to further direct isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) testing efforts in concurrently collected urine samples to confirm testosterone abuse. To evaluate the practicality of implementing the serum T/LH ratio for routine use, testosterone values in 356 serum samples were compared between a \"gold-standard\" LC-MS/MS method and an automated immunoassay method. Excellent correlation and minimal bias between the two methods were observed, highlighting the validity of the immunoassay method. Next, a testosterone administration study utilizing a transdermal delivery route was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the serum T/LH ratio to the currently used serum testosterone to androstenedione (T/A4) and urinary testosterone to epitestosterone (T/E) ratios. The serum T/LH ratio was more sensitive than the T/A4 ratio and showed similar sensitivity to the urinary T/E ratio with high interindividual variability. Finally, T/LH analysis was conducted on 626 capillary serum samples collected in the field from male Ultimate Fighting Championship athletes. Of the three samples that showed elevated T/LH ratios in this pool, two of the corresponding urine samples were IRMS positive, one of which showed an unremarkable urinary T/E ratio and relatively normal steroid profile. These results indicate serum T/LH ratio monitoring provides a beneficial addition to the anti-doping tool kit and can improve urinary IRMS testing recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":160,"journal":{"name":"Drug Testing and Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Testosterone-to-Luteinizing Hormone Ratio in Male Anti-Doping Serum Samples: Results From a Transdermal Testosterone Administration Trial and Field Collected Samples.\",\"authors\":\"Jenna M Goodrum, Vinod S Nair, Andre K Crouch, Daniel Eichner, Geoffrey D Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/dta.3959\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The serum testosterone-to-luteinizing hormone (T/LH) ratio has previously been suggested as a sensitive marker of testosterone use in an anti-doping setting. When measured with an automated immunoassay platform, this ratio represents a quick and cost-effective screening biomarker to further direct isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) testing efforts in concurrently collected urine samples to confirm testosterone abuse. To evaluate the practicality of implementing the serum T/LH ratio for routine use, testosterone values in 356 serum samples were compared between a \\\"gold-standard\\\" LC-MS/MS method and an automated immunoassay method. Excellent correlation and minimal bias between the two methods were observed, highlighting the validity of the immunoassay method. Next, a testosterone administration study utilizing a transdermal delivery route was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the serum T/LH ratio to the currently used serum testosterone to androstenedione (T/A4) and urinary testosterone to epitestosterone (T/E) ratios. The serum T/LH ratio was more sensitive than the T/A4 ratio and showed similar sensitivity to the urinary T/E ratio with high interindividual variability. Finally, T/LH analysis was conducted on 626 capillary serum samples collected in the field from male Ultimate Fighting Championship athletes. Of the three samples that showed elevated T/LH ratios in this pool, two of the corresponding urine samples were IRMS positive, one of which showed an unremarkable urinary T/E ratio and relatively normal steroid profile. These results indicate serum T/LH ratio monitoring provides a beneficial addition to the anti-doping tool kit and can improve urinary IRMS testing recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":160,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug Testing and Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3959\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Testing and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.3959","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血清睾酮对黄体生成素(T/LH)比率曾被认为是在反兴奋剂设置睾酮使用的敏感标记。当使用自动免疫分析平台测量时,该比率代表了一种快速且具有成本效益的筛选生物标志物,可以进一步在同时收集的尿液样本中进行直接同位素比质谱(IRMS)测试,以确认睾酮滥用。为了评估常规使用血清T/LH比值的实用性,比较了“金标准”LC-MS/MS方法和自动免疫分析方法在356份血清样本中的睾酮值。观察到两种方法之间具有良好的相关性和最小的偏差,突出了免疫测定方法的有效性。接下来,采用透皮给药途径进行睾酮给药研究,比较血清T/LH比率与目前使用的血清睾酮/雄烯二酮(T/A4)和尿睾酮/表睾酮(T/E)比率的有效性。血清T/LH比T/A4更敏感,对尿T/E的敏感性相似,但个体间差异较大。最后,对现场采集的626例终极格斗冠军赛男性运动员的毛细管血清进行T/LH分析。在该池中显示T/LH比升高的三个样本中,两个相应的尿液样本为IRMS阳性,其中一个显示尿T/E比不显著,类固醇谱相对正常。这些结果表明,血清T/LH比值监测为反兴奋剂工具包提供了有益的补充,并可以改善尿IRMS检测建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Testosterone-to-Luteinizing Hormone Ratio in Male Anti-Doping Serum Samples: Results From a Transdermal Testosterone Administration Trial and Field Collected Samples.

The serum testosterone-to-luteinizing hormone (T/LH) ratio has previously been suggested as a sensitive marker of testosterone use in an anti-doping setting. When measured with an automated immunoassay platform, this ratio represents a quick and cost-effective screening biomarker to further direct isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) testing efforts in concurrently collected urine samples to confirm testosterone abuse. To evaluate the practicality of implementing the serum T/LH ratio for routine use, testosterone values in 356 serum samples were compared between a "gold-standard" LC-MS/MS method and an automated immunoassay method. Excellent correlation and minimal bias between the two methods were observed, highlighting the validity of the immunoassay method. Next, a testosterone administration study utilizing a transdermal delivery route was conducted to compare the effectiveness of the serum T/LH ratio to the currently used serum testosterone to androstenedione (T/A4) and urinary testosterone to epitestosterone (T/E) ratios. The serum T/LH ratio was more sensitive than the T/A4 ratio and showed similar sensitivity to the urinary T/E ratio with high interindividual variability. Finally, T/LH analysis was conducted on 626 capillary serum samples collected in the field from male Ultimate Fighting Championship athletes. Of the three samples that showed elevated T/LH ratios in this pool, two of the corresponding urine samples were IRMS positive, one of which showed an unremarkable urinary T/E ratio and relatively normal steroid profile. These results indicate serum T/LH ratio monitoring provides a beneficial addition to the anti-doping tool kit and can improve urinary IRMS testing recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Testing and Analysis
Drug Testing and Analysis BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS-CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
24.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: As the incidence of drugs escalates in 21st century living, their detection and analysis have become increasingly important. Sport, the workplace, crime investigation, homeland security, the pharmaceutical industry and the environment are just some of the high profile arenas in which analytical testing has provided an important investigative tool for uncovering the presence of extraneous substances. In addition to the usual publishing fare of primary research articles, case reports and letters, Drug Testing and Analysis offers a unique combination of; ‘How to’ material such as ‘Tutorials’ and ‘Reviews’, Speculative pieces (‘Commentaries’ and ‘Perspectives'', providing a broader scientific and social context to the aspects of analytical testing), ‘Annual banned substance reviews’ (delivering a critical evaluation of the methods used in the characterization of established and newly outlawed compounds). Rather than focus on the application of a single technique, Drug Testing and Analysis employs a unique multidisciplinary approach to the field of controversial compound determination. Papers discussing chromatography, mass spectrometry, immunological approaches, 1D/2D gel electrophoresis, to name just a few select methods, are welcomed where their application is related to any of the six key topics listed below.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信