Ziyu Chen, Han Fu, Chen Zhang, Jiawen Chen, Ying Xu, Yuqin Zheng, Yu Zhong, Xiuli Wang, Changdong Gu, Jiangping Tu
{"title":"用于高能量密度锂电池的铜箔:复合与超薄","authors":"Ziyu Chen, Han Fu, Chen Zhang, Jiawen Chen, Ying Xu, Yuqin Zheng, Yu Zhong, Xiuli Wang, Changdong Gu, Jiangping Tu","doi":"10.1016/j.est.2025.118917","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The escalating demand for higher energy density in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and anode-free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) has driven the exploration of lightweight current collectors (CCs). Conventional Cu foils face critical limitations in cost and thickness reduction, necessitating innovative alternatives. Composite Cu foils have emerged as a promising solution, offering ultra-lightweight design, orthogonal conductivity, and intrinsic safety. However, they concurrently face challenges such as interfacial instability, electronic transport inefficiencies, and immature manufacturing scalability. This study systematically compares PET-based composite Cu foils (PET<img>Cu) with ultrathin Cu foils in graphite (Gr)-based LIBs and AFLMBs. PET-Cu shows higher tensile strength and buffers Gr volume expansion, enhancing capacity retention to 93.9 % after 290 cycles in LIBs, though its insulating layer increases interfacial resistance. In AFLMBs, PET-Cu enables uniform Li deposition initially but succumbs to rapid capacity decay due to interfacial deterioration. While excelling in energy density, PET-Cu faces trade-offs in conductivity and cyclability. The study highlights the need for interface engineering and scalable manufacturing to optimize composite CC design.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15942,"journal":{"name":"Journal of energy storage","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 118917"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Copper foils for high-energy-density lithium batteries: Composite vs. ultrathin\",\"authors\":\"Ziyu Chen, Han Fu, Chen Zhang, Jiawen Chen, Ying Xu, Yuqin Zheng, Yu Zhong, Xiuli Wang, Changdong Gu, Jiangping Tu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.est.2025.118917\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The escalating demand for higher energy density in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and anode-free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) has driven the exploration of lightweight current collectors (CCs). Conventional Cu foils face critical limitations in cost and thickness reduction, necessitating innovative alternatives. Composite Cu foils have emerged as a promising solution, offering ultra-lightweight design, orthogonal conductivity, and intrinsic safety. However, they concurrently face challenges such as interfacial instability, electronic transport inefficiencies, and immature manufacturing scalability. This study systematically compares PET-based composite Cu foils (PET<img>Cu) with ultrathin Cu foils in graphite (Gr)-based LIBs and AFLMBs. PET-Cu shows higher tensile strength and buffers Gr volume expansion, enhancing capacity retention to 93.9 % after 290 cycles in LIBs, though its insulating layer increases interfacial resistance. In AFLMBs, PET-Cu enables uniform Li deposition initially but succumbs to rapid capacity decay due to interfacial deterioration. While excelling in energy density, PET-Cu faces trade-offs in conductivity and cyclability. The study highlights the need for interface engineering and scalable manufacturing to optimize composite CC design.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15942,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 118917\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of energy storage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25036308\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of energy storage","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352152X25036308","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Copper foils for high-energy-density lithium batteries: Composite vs. ultrathin
The escalating demand for higher energy density in lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) and anode-free lithium metal batteries (AFLMBs) has driven the exploration of lightweight current collectors (CCs). Conventional Cu foils face critical limitations in cost and thickness reduction, necessitating innovative alternatives. Composite Cu foils have emerged as a promising solution, offering ultra-lightweight design, orthogonal conductivity, and intrinsic safety. However, they concurrently face challenges such as interfacial instability, electronic transport inefficiencies, and immature manufacturing scalability. This study systematically compares PET-based composite Cu foils (PETCu) with ultrathin Cu foils in graphite (Gr)-based LIBs and AFLMBs. PET-Cu shows higher tensile strength and buffers Gr volume expansion, enhancing capacity retention to 93.9 % after 290 cycles in LIBs, though its insulating layer increases interfacial resistance. In AFLMBs, PET-Cu enables uniform Li deposition initially but succumbs to rapid capacity decay due to interfacial deterioration. While excelling in energy density, PET-Cu faces trade-offs in conductivity and cyclability. The study highlights the need for interface engineering and scalable manufacturing to optimize composite CC design.
期刊介绍:
Journal of energy storage focusses on all aspects of energy storage, in particular systems integration, electric grid integration, modelling and analysis, novel energy storage technologies, sizing and management strategies, business models for operation of storage systems and energy storage developments worldwide.