中试流化床转化装置的技术概念及过程建模

IF 7.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fuel Pub Date : 2025-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137166
Fanfan Xu, Dmitri Nešumajev, Oliver Järvik, Ants Martins, Alar Konist
{"title":"中试流化床转化装置的技术概念及过程建模","authors":"Fanfan Xu,&nbsp;Dmitri Nešumajev,&nbsp;Oliver Järvik,&nbsp;Ants Martins,&nbsp;Alar Konist","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Fluidized bed technology offers excellent heat and mass transfer that enhances reaction efficiency and product quality during thermochemical conversion. In this study, a pilot-scale integrated combustion–pyrolysis fluidized bed facility was evaluated, where heat from oil shale combustion is used for biomass pyrolysis. The system provides several unique advantages, such as fewer startup issues, shorter residence time, and uncomplicated configurations. Process simulation was performed in Aspen Plus, followed by workflow development, model validation, sensitivity analysis, and performance evaluation. Two integrated processes (oil shale combustion and biomass pyrolysis) were simulated, and the outputs (flue gas composition and product yield) were validated against experimental data. Comparable results confirmed the predictability of the developed simulation workflow. Flue gas results showed that the CO<sub>2</sub> fraction was approximately 20 % during air combustion of oil shale, but increased to 80–90 % under oxyfuel conditions. The maximum bio-oil was yielded (35.17 wt%) at450 °C, while higher temperatures favored non-condensable gas release. Energy and exergy analyses indicated that oxyfuel combustion improved overall energy efficiency from 65.14 % to 67.78 % and exergy efficiency from 27.55 % to 31.09 %, respectively. The study comprehensively demonstrates the feasibility of the pilot-scale combustion-pyrolysis facility and provides guidelines for future commissioning campaigns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"406 ","pages":"Article 137166"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technical concept and process modeling of a pilot-scale fluidized bed conversion facility\",\"authors\":\"Fanfan Xu,&nbsp;Dmitri Nešumajev,&nbsp;Oliver Järvik,&nbsp;Ants Martins,&nbsp;Alar Konist\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.137166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Fluidized bed technology offers excellent heat and mass transfer that enhances reaction efficiency and product quality during thermochemical conversion. In this study, a pilot-scale integrated combustion–pyrolysis fluidized bed facility was evaluated, where heat from oil shale combustion is used for biomass pyrolysis. The system provides several unique advantages, such as fewer startup issues, shorter residence time, and uncomplicated configurations. Process simulation was performed in Aspen Plus, followed by workflow development, model validation, sensitivity analysis, and performance evaluation. Two integrated processes (oil shale combustion and biomass pyrolysis) were simulated, and the outputs (flue gas composition and product yield) were validated against experimental data. Comparable results confirmed the predictability of the developed simulation workflow. Flue gas results showed that the CO<sub>2</sub> fraction was approximately 20 % during air combustion of oil shale, but increased to 80–90 % under oxyfuel conditions. The maximum bio-oil was yielded (35.17 wt%) at450 °C, while higher temperatures favored non-condensable gas release. Energy and exergy analyses indicated that oxyfuel combustion improved overall energy efficiency from 65.14 % to 67.78 % and exergy efficiency from 27.55 % to 31.09 %, respectively. The study comprehensively demonstrates the feasibility of the pilot-scale combustion-pyrolysis facility and provides guidelines for future commissioning campaigns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuel\",\"volume\":\"406 \",\"pages\":\"Article 137166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125028911\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016236125028911","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流化床技术提供了良好的传热传质,提高了热化学转化过程中的反应效率和产品质量。在本研究中,评估了一个中试规模的燃烧-热解一体化流化床装置,其中油页岩燃烧产生的热量用于生物质热解。该系统具有几个独特的优点,如启动问题少、停留时间短、配置简单。在Aspen Plus中进行过程仿真,随后进行工作流开发、模型验证、敏感性分析和性能评估。模拟了两个综合过程(油页岩燃烧和生物质热解),并根据实验数据验证了输出(烟气组成和产品产量)。比较结果证实了开发的仿真工作流程的可预测性。结果表明,油页岩空气燃烧时CO2含量约为20%,富氧燃烧时CO2含量可达80 - 90%。在450°C时,最大生物油产量(35.17 wt%),而更高的温度有利于不凝性气体的释放。能源和火用分析表明,含氧燃料燃烧将总能源效率从65.14%提高到67.78%,将火用效率从27.55%提高到31.09%。该研究全面论证了中试规模燃烧热解装置的可行性,并为未来的调试活动提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Technical concept and process modeling of a pilot-scale fluidized bed conversion facility
Fluidized bed technology offers excellent heat and mass transfer that enhances reaction efficiency and product quality during thermochemical conversion. In this study, a pilot-scale integrated combustion–pyrolysis fluidized bed facility was evaluated, where heat from oil shale combustion is used for biomass pyrolysis. The system provides several unique advantages, such as fewer startup issues, shorter residence time, and uncomplicated configurations. Process simulation was performed in Aspen Plus, followed by workflow development, model validation, sensitivity analysis, and performance evaluation. Two integrated processes (oil shale combustion and biomass pyrolysis) were simulated, and the outputs (flue gas composition and product yield) were validated against experimental data. Comparable results confirmed the predictability of the developed simulation workflow. Flue gas results showed that the CO2 fraction was approximately 20 % during air combustion of oil shale, but increased to 80–90 % under oxyfuel conditions. The maximum bio-oil was yielded (35.17 wt%) at450 °C, while higher temperatures favored non-condensable gas release. Energy and exergy analyses indicated that oxyfuel combustion improved overall energy efficiency from 65.14 % to 67.78 % and exergy efficiency from 27.55 % to 31.09 %, respectively. The study comprehensively demonstrates the feasibility of the pilot-scale combustion-pyrolysis facility and provides guidelines for future commissioning campaigns.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信