{"title":"克利维地平在高血压急症和非暴发性高血压急症中的疗效和安全性:一项III期、多中心、随机、双盲、阳性药物平行对照研究","authors":"Xiaoning Han, Wei Ma, Bo Wang, Xiang Gu, Guangjun Wang, Ling Lin, Qiufang Lian, Dongna Guo, Xiaoqun Wan, Jiaying Zhu, Wei Guo, Zhenzhong Zhu, Zijing Liang, Dexiong Chen, Anbao Chen, Zhiming Shi, Baofeng Zhu, Anyong Yu, Lishan Yang, Chunhua Zheng, Wenkai Bin, Dapeng Cheng, Yanfen Chai, Jianlong Sheng, Lang Hong, Qiuping Mo, Yu Wang, Lizhen Tang, Shugui Li, Xiwen Zhang, Xiaomei Guo, Ningru Zhang, Yong Huo","doi":"10.1111/jch.70144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hypertensive crises require rapid blood pressure control to prevent stroke and myocardial injury. Despite Cleviprex's efficacy, its high cost limits accessibility in China. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a generic clevidipine (China's first injectable generic clevidipine emulsion) versus the branded drug Cleviprex in managing hypertensive emergencies and urgencies among Chinese patients. A total of 377 patients of 33 medical centers from December 2021 to December 2022 were randomized, with 189 in the generic clevidipine group and 188 in the control. As a result, 95.6% of patients in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control achieved the target systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction within 30 min (rate difference 0.020, 90% CI: −0.019 to 0.060). The mean area under the curve (AUC) of SBP outside the target range within the first hour was comparable between groups (329.8 ± 238.16 in generic clevidipine vs. 347.9 ± 302.79 in control). The median time to first achieve the target range within 30 min was 12.0 min in both groups. The proportion of patients successfully transitioning to oral therapy within 6 h was 93.4% in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was reported in 50 patients (27.3%) in the generic clevidipine group and in 48 (27.9%) in the control, with no unexpected safety signals. The generic clevidipine demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to the branded drug, supporting its potential as an effective and accessible therapeutic alternative for acute hypertension management.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>: chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR20212877.</p>","PeriodicalId":50237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","volume":"27 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519423/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of a Generic Clevidipine in Hypertensive Urgencies and Non-Fulminant Hypertensive Emergencies: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive Drug Parallel-Controlled Study\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoning Han, Wei Ma, Bo Wang, Xiang Gu, Guangjun Wang, Ling Lin, Qiufang Lian, Dongna Guo, Xiaoqun Wan, Jiaying Zhu, Wei Guo, Zhenzhong Zhu, Zijing Liang, Dexiong Chen, Anbao Chen, Zhiming Shi, Baofeng Zhu, Anyong Yu, Lishan Yang, Chunhua Zheng, Wenkai Bin, Dapeng Cheng, Yanfen Chai, Jianlong Sheng, Lang Hong, Qiuping Mo, Yu Wang, Lizhen Tang, Shugui Li, Xiwen Zhang, Xiaomei Guo, Ningru Zhang, Yong Huo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jch.70144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hypertensive crises require rapid blood pressure control to prevent stroke and myocardial injury. Despite Cleviprex's efficacy, its high cost limits accessibility in China. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a generic clevidipine (China's first injectable generic clevidipine emulsion) versus the branded drug Cleviprex in managing hypertensive emergencies and urgencies among Chinese patients. A total of 377 patients of 33 medical centers from December 2021 to December 2022 were randomized, with 189 in the generic clevidipine group and 188 in the control. As a result, 95.6% of patients in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control achieved the target systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction within 30 min (rate difference 0.020, 90% CI: −0.019 to 0.060). The mean area under the curve (AUC) of SBP outside the target range within the first hour was comparable between groups (329.8 ± 238.16 in generic clevidipine vs. 347.9 ± 302.79 in control). The median time to first achieve the target range within 30 min was 12.0 min in both groups. The proportion of patients successfully transitioning to oral therapy within 6 h was 93.4% in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was reported in 50 patients (27.3%) in the generic clevidipine group and in 48 (27.9%) in the control, with no unexpected safety signals. The generic clevidipine demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to the branded drug, supporting its potential as an effective and accessible therapeutic alternative for acute hypertension management.</p><p><b>Trial Registration</b>: chinadrugtrials.org.cn identifier: ChiCTR20212877.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50237,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"27 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12519423/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70144\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jch.70144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy and Safety of a Generic Clevidipine in Hypertensive Urgencies and Non-Fulminant Hypertensive Emergencies: A Phase III, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Positive Drug Parallel-Controlled Study
Hypertensive crises require rapid blood pressure control to prevent stroke and myocardial injury. Despite Cleviprex's efficacy, its high cost limits accessibility in China. This Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a generic clevidipine (China's first injectable generic clevidipine emulsion) versus the branded drug Cleviprex in managing hypertensive emergencies and urgencies among Chinese patients. A total of 377 patients of 33 medical centers from December 2021 to December 2022 were randomized, with 189 in the generic clevidipine group and 188 in the control. As a result, 95.6% of patients in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control achieved the target systolic blood pressure (SBP) reduction within 30 min (rate difference 0.020, 90% CI: −0.019 to 0.060). The mean area under the curve (AUC) of SBP outside the target range within the first hour was comparable between groups (329.8 ± 238.16 in generic clevidipine vs. 347.9 ± 302.79 in control). The median time to first achieve the target range within 30 min was 12.0 min in both groups. The proportion of patients successfully transitioning to oral therapy within 6 h was 93.4% in the generic clevidipine group and 93.6% in the control group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was reported in 50 patients (27.3%) in the generic clevidipine group and in 48 (27.9%) in the control, with no unexpected safety signals. The generic clevidipine demonstrated comparable efficacy and safety to the branded drug, supporting its potential as an effective and accessible therapeutic alternative for acute hypertension management.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Hypertension is a peer-reviewed, monthly publication that serves internists, cardiologists, nephrologists, endocrinologists, hypertension specialists, primary care practitioners, pharmacists and all professionals interested in hypertension by providing objective, up-to-date information and practical recommendations on the full range of clinical aspects of hypertension. Commentaries and columns by experts in the field provide further insights into our original research articles as well as on major articles published elsewhere. Major guidelines for the management of hypertension are also an important feature of the Journal. Through its partnership with the World Hypertension League, JCH will include a new focus on hypertension and public health, including major policy issues, that features research and reviews related to disease characteristics and management at the population level.