Deniz Mutlu, Athanasios Rempakos, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro E P Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Eleni Kladou, Ozgur Selim Ser, Lorenzo Azzalini, Farouc A Jaffer, Luiz Ybarra, Omer Goktekin, Mahmut Uluganyan, Ramazan Ozdemir, Basem Elbarouni, Khaldoon Alaswad, Rhian Davies, Ahmed ElGuindy, Cuneyt Kocas, Sefa Sural, Paul Poommipanit, Jarrod Frizzel, Mir B Basir, Leah Raj, Laura Young, Bavana V Rangan, Olga C Mastrodemos, Jaskanwal Deep Singh Sara, Sandeep Jalli, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Sevket Gorgulu
{"title":"药物包被球囊在慢性全闭塞经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用:来自进展- cto登记的见解。","authors":"Deniz Mutlu, Athanasios Rempakos, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro E P Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Eleni Kladou, Ozgur Selim Ser, Lorenzo Azzalini, Farouc A Jaffer, Luiz Ybarra, Omer Goktekin, Mahmut Uluganyan, Ramazan Ozdemir, Basem Elbarouni, Khaldoon Alaswad, Rhian Davies, Ahmed ElGuindy, Cuneyt Kocas, Sefa Sural, Paul Poommipanit, Jarrod Frizzel, Mir B Basir, Leah Raj, Laura Young, Bavana V Rangan, Olga C Mastrodemos, Jaskanwal Deep Singh Sara, Sandeep Jalli, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Sevket Gorgulu","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in CTO PCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in a large, multicenter CTO PCI registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 12,146 patients who underwent 12,157 successful CTO PCIs at 59 centers from 2018 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DCBs were used in 454 patients (3.7%) with increasing frequency over time (p = 0.020). A DCB-only strategy was used in 48.4% of the patients and a hybrid strategy combining DCBs and drug-eluting stents (DES) was used in 51.6% of patients. Patients treated with DCB (both strategies) had low prevalence of comorbidities. Compared with the DES cases, DCB only cases had favorable angiographic characteristics, lower mean J-CTO (Japanese CTO) score (1.83 ± 1.03 vs. 2.27 ± 1.23; p < 0.001), and similar technical success (96.3% vs. 97.3%; p = 0.640), and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The hybrid and DCB-only strategies had comparable technical success and in-hospital MACE. During a median follow-up of 323 (170-429) days, DCB only cases had lower MACE than the other strategies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.96, p = 0.040). After multivariable adjustment, the association remained significant (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.92, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCBs are increasingly being used in CTO PCI. A DCB only strategy was used in less complex lesions and was associated with similar technical success and in-hospital MACE compared with hybrid or DES strategies. A DCB only strategy was associated with lower long-term MACE.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-Coated Balloons in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.\",\"authors\":\"Deniz Mutlu, Athanasios Rempakos, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro E P Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Eleni Kladou, Ozgur Selim Ser, Lorenzo Azzalini, Farouc A Jaffer, Luiz Ybarra, Omer Goktekin, Mahmut Uluganyan, Ramazan Ozdemir, Basem Elbarouni, Khaldoon Alaswad, Rhian Davies, Ahmed ElGuindy, Cuneyt Kocas, Sefa Sural, Paul Poommipanit, Jarrod Frizzel, Mir B Basir, Leah Raj, Laura Young, Bavana V Rangan, Olga C Mastrodemos, Jaskanwal Deep Singh Sara, Sandeep Jalli, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Sevket Gorgulu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To assess the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in CTO PCI.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in a large, multicenter CTO PCI registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed 12,146 patients who underwent 12,157 successful CTO PCIs at 59 centers from 2018 to 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DCBs were used in 454 patients (3.7%) with increasing frequency over time (p = 0.020). A DCB-only strategy was used in 48.4% of the patients and a hybrid strategy combining DCBs and drug-eluting stents (DES) was used in 51.6% of patients. Patients treated with DCB (both strategies) had low prevalence of comorbidities. Compared with the DES cases, DCB only cases had favorable angiographic characteristics, lower mean J-CTO (Japanese CTO) score (1.83 ± 1.03 vs. 2.27 ± 1.23; p < 0.001), and similar technical success (96.3% vs. 97.3%; p = 0.640), and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The hybrid and DCB-only strategies had comparable technical success and in-hospital MACE. During a median follow-up of 323 (170-429) days, DCB only cases had lower MACE than the other strategies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.96, p = 0.040). After multivariable adjustment, the association remained significant (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.92, p = 0.032).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>DCBs are increasingly being used in CTO PCI. A DCB only strategy was used in less complex lesions and was associated with similar technical success and in-hospital MACE compared with hybrid or DES strategies. A DCB only strategy was associated with lower long-term MACE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:关于药物包被球囊(DCBs)在慢性全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的应用的信息有限。目的:评估DCB在CTO PCI中的使用频率和结果。目的:本研究评估了DCB在大型多中心CTO PCI登记中的使用频率和结果。方法:我们分析了2018年至2025年在59个中心接受12157例CTO pci成功的12146例患者。结果:454例(3.7%)患者使用dcb,随时间增加使用频率(p = 0.020)。48.4%的患者仅使用dcb策略,51.6%的患者使用dcb和药物洗脱支架(DES)的混合策略。接受DCB治疗的患者(两种策略)的合并症患病率较低。与DES患者相比,DCB患者具有良好的血管造影特征,平均J-CTO(日本CTO)评分较低(1.83±1.03 vs. 2.27±1.23);p结论:DCB在CTO PCI中的应用越来越多。与混合或DES策略相比,仅DCB策略用于不太复杂的病变,并且与相似的技术成功和院内MACE相关。仅DCB策略与较低的长期MACE相关。
Drug-Coated Balloons in Chronic Total Occlusion Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Insights From the PROGRESS-CTO Registry.
Background: There is limited information on the use of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Aims: To assess the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in CTO PCI.
Objective: This study evaluated the frequency and outcomes of DCB use in a large, multicenter CTO PCI registry.
Methods: We analyzed 12,146 patients who underwent 12,157 successful CTO PCIs at 59 centers from 2018 to 2025.
Results: DCBs were used in 454 patients (3.7%) with increasing frequency over time (p = 0.020). A DCB-only strategy was used in 48.4% of the patients and a hybrid strategy combining DCBs and drug-eluting stents (DES) was used in 51.6% of patients. Patients treated with DCB (both strategies) had low prevalence of comorbidities. Compared with the DES cases, DCB only cases had favorable angiographic characteristics, lower mean J-CTO (Japanese CTO) score (1.83 ± 1.03 vs. 2.27 ± 1.23; p < 0.001), and similar technical success (96.3% vs. 97.3%; p = 0.640), and in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The hybrid and DCB-only strategies had comparable technical success and in-hospital MACE. During a median follow-up of 323 (170-429) days, DCB only cases had lower MACE than the other strategies (hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.17-0.96, p = 0.040). After multivariable adjustment, the association remained significant (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.16-0.92, p = 0.032).
Conclusions: DCBs are increasingly being used in CTO PCI. A DCB only strategy was used in less complex lesions and was associated with similar technical success and in-hospital MACE compared with hybrid or DES strategies. A DCB only strategy was associated with lower long-term MACE.