从注意到临床判断:探讨虚拟现实护理模拟中的焦虑。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Janet M Reed, Michelle Aebersold, Kathie Lasater
{"title":"从注意到临床判断:探讨虚拟现实护理模拟中的焦虑。","authors":"Janet M Reed, Michelle Aebersold, Kathie Lasater","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000002008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional noticing is the first step of clinical judgment and a core competency for nurses. Immersive virtual reality (VR) simulations offer students individualized practice and feedback in noticing, which anxiety may impact.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the relationship between facilitating and debilitating anxiety and noticing among students in VR simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional single-site quantitative study, using individual VR simulations with prelicensure nursing students. Outcomes were measured using the Achievement Anxiety Test and Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant correlations between LCJR noticing scores and either type of anxiety: debilitating anxiety scores: (rs [31] = -0.035, P = .854), facilitating anxiety (rs [31] = 0.18, P = .32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that anxiety, whether debilitating or facilitating, is not significantly associated with noticing in VR simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Noticing to Clinical Judgment: Exploring Anxiety in Virtual Reality Nursing Simulation.\",\"authors\":\"Janet M Reed, Michelle Aebersold, Kathie Lasater\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NNE.0000000000002008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional noticing is the first step of clinical judgment and a core competency for nurses. Immersive virtual reality (VR) simulations offer students individualized practice and feedback in noticing, which anxiety may impact.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe the relationship between facilitating and debilitating anxiety and noticing among students in VR simulation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a cross-sectional single-site quantitative study, using individual VR simulations with prelicensure nursing students. Outcomes were measured using the Achievement Anxiety Test and Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant correlations between LCJR noticing scores and either type of anxiety: debilitating anxiety scores: (rs [31] = -0.035, P = .854), facilitating anxiety (rs [31] = 0.18, P = .32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study suggests that anxiety, whether debilitating or facilitating, is not significantly associated with noticing in VR simulation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54706,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000002008\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000002008","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:专业注意是临床判断的第一步,是护士的核心能力。沉浸式虚拟现实(VR)模拟为学生提供个性化的注意练习和反馈,这可能会影响焦虑。目的:探讨虚拟现实模拟中学生焦虑与注意之间的关系。方法:这是一项横断面单点定量研究,使用个人虚拟现实模拟护理学生。结果采用成就焦虑测试和后期临床判断量表(LCJR)进行测量。结果:LCJR注意得分与两种焦虑类型均无显著相关性:衰弱性焦虑得分(rs [31] = -0.035, P = .854),促进性焦虑得分(rs [31] = 0.18, P = .32)。结论:本研究表明,在虚拟现实模拟中,焦虑(无论是使人衰弱还是使人便利)与注意没有显著相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Noticing to Clinical Judgment: Exploring Anxiety in Virtual Reality Nursing Simulation.

Background: Professional noticing is the first step of clinical judgment and a core competency for nurses. Immersive virtual reality (VR) simulations offer students individualized practice and feedback in noticing, which anxiety may impact.

Purpose: To describe the relationship between facilitating and debilitating anxiety and noticing among students in VR simulation.

Methods: This was a cross-sectional single-site quantitative study, using individual VR simulations with prelicensure nursing students. Outcomes were measured using the Achievement Anxiety Test and Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric (LCJR).

Results: There were no significant correlations between LCJR noticing scores and either type of anxiety: debilitating anxiety scores: (rs [31] = -0.035, P = .854), facilitating anxiety (rs [31] = 0.18, P = .32).

Conclusion: This study suggests that anxiety, whether debilitating or facilitating, is not significantly associated with noticing in VR simulation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信