信息框架对肺癌手术患者肺康复行为的影响:随机对照试验。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Yanyan Liu, Lin Yu, Huiping Cao, Zhuo Yang, Ziyu Wang, Shuai Qiao, Xinxin Shen, Yaodong Ye, Jiao Xie
{"title":"信息框架对肺癌手术患者肺康复行为的影响:随机对照试验。","authors":"Yanyan Liu, Lin Yu, Huiping Cao, Zhuo Yang, Ziyu Wang, Shuai Qiao, Xinxin Shen, Yaodong Ye, Jiao Xie","doi":"10.1007/s00520-025-09994-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves conditions for lung cancer (LC) surgery patients, but PR behavior is suboptimal. This study investigated the effect of message framing on PR behavior in this population, as this area is underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-arm randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients randomly assigned to a gain-framed message (GFM) group (information emphasizing positive outcomes of PR adherence), a loss-framed message (LFM) group (information highlighting negative consequences of non-adherence to PR), or a no-framed message (NFM) group (PR with no framed messages). Data were collected at admission, the day before surgery, the day of discharge, and one month after discharge. Primary outcomes were postoperative exercise adherence and exercise self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes included exercise capacity, dyspnea, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable (P > 0.05). Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant time effect (P < 0.001) and a significant group effect (P < 0.001) for exercise adherence. For exercise self-efficacy, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and anxiety, significant time effects, group effects, and interaction effects were observed (all P < 0.05). However, the interaction effect for depression was not statistically significant (P = 0.109). Both the GFM and LFM groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes across all measures compared to the NFM group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GFM group showed significantly greater improvement than the LFM group in all outcomes (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Message frames appear to be a promising communication strategy, with GFM in particular showing potential. When combined with PR, they may have the potential to improve PR behaviors and outcomes among patients undergoing LC surgery. Trial registration number (ChiCTR2300070445) and date of registration (2023-04-12).</p>","PeriodicalId":22046,"journal":{"name":"Supportive Care in Cancer","volume":"33 11","pages":"939"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of message framing on pulmonary rehabilitation behavior for lung cancer surgery patients: Randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Yanyan Liu, Lin Yu, Huiping Cao, Zhuo Yang, Ziyu Wang, Shuai Qiao, Xinxin Shen, Yaodong Ye, Jiao Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00520-025-09994-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves conditions for lung cancer (LC) surgery patients, but PR behavior is suboptimal. This study investigated the effect of message framing on PR behavior in this population, as this area is underexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A three-arm randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients randomly assigned to a gain-framed message (GFM) group (information emphasizing positive outcomes of PR adherence), a loss-framed message (LFM) group (information highlighting negative consequences of non-adherence to PR), or a no-framed message (NFM) group (PR with no framed messages). Data were collected at admission, the day before surgery, the day of discharge, and one month after discharge. Primary outcomes were postoperative exercise adherence and exercise self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes included exercise capacity, dyspnea, anxiety, and depression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable (P > 0.05). Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant time effect (P < 0.001) and a significant group effect (P < 0.001) for exercise adherence. For exercise self-efficacy, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and anxiety, significant time effects, group effects, and interaction effects were observed (all P < 0.05). However, the interaction effect for depression was not statistically significant (P = 0.109). Both the GFM and LFM groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes across all measures compared to the NFM group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GFM group showed significantly greater improvement than the LFM group in all outcomes (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Message frames appear to be a promising communication strategy, with GFM in particular showing potential. When combined with PR, they may have the potential to improve PR behaviors and outcomes among patients undergoing LC surgery. Trial registration number (ChiCTR2300070445) and date of registration (2023-04-12).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"volume\":\"33 11\",\"pages\":\"939\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Supportive Care in Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09994-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Supportive Care in Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-025-09994-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:肺部康复(PR)改善了肺癌(LC)手术患者的病情,但PR行为并不理想。本研究调查了信息框架对这一人群公关行为的影响,因为这一领域尚未得到充分探索。方法:一项三组随机对照试验招募了102名患者,随机分配到增益框架信息(GFM)组(强调PR依从性的积极结果的信息)、损失框架信息(LFM)组(强调不遵守PR的负面后果的信息)或无框架信息(NFM)组(没有框架信息的PR)。数据收集于入院时、手术前一天、出院当天和出院后一个月。主要结果为术后运动依从性和运动自我效能。次要结局包括运动能力、呼吸困难、焦虑和抑郁。结果:三组患者基线特征具有可比性(P < 0.05)。重复测量方差分析显示了显著的时间效应(P结论:消息帧似乎是一种很有前途的通信策略,特别是GFM显示出潜力。当与PR联合使用时,它们可能有潜力改善LC手术患者的PR行为和结果。试验注册号(ChiCTR2300070445)和注册日期(2023-04-12)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of message framing on pulmonary rehabilitation behavior for lung cancer surgery patients: Randomized controlled trial.

Objective: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves conditions for lung cancer (LC) surgery patients, but PR behavior is suboptimal. This study investigated the effect of message framing on PR behavior in this population, as this area is underexplored.

Methods: A three-arm randomized controlled trial enrolled 102 patients randomly assigned to a gain-framed message (GFM) group (information emphasizing positive outcomes of PR adherence), a loss-framed message (LFM) group (information highlighting negative consequences of non-adherence to PR), or a no-framed message (NFM) group (PR with no framed messages). Data were collected at admission, the day before surgery, the day of discharge, and one month after discharge. Primary outcomes were postoperative exercise adherence and exercise self-efficacy. Secondary outcomes included exercise capacity, dyspnea, anxiety, and depression.

Results: The baseline characteristics of the three groups were comparable (P > 0.05). Repeated measures analysis of variance revealed a significant time effect (P < 0.001) and a significant group effect (P < 0.001) for exercise adherence. For exercise self-efficacy, exercise capacity, dyspnea, and anxiety, significant time effects, group effects, and interaction effects were observed (all P < 0.05). However, the interaction effect for depression was not statistically significant (P = 0.109). Both the GFM and LFM groups demonstrated significantly better outcomes across all measures compared to the NFM group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the GFM group showed significantly greater improvement than the LFM group in all outcomes (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Message frames appear to be a promising communication strategy, with GFM in particular showing potential. When combined with PR, they may have the potential to improve PR behaviors and outcomes among patients undergoing LC surgery. Trial registration number (ChiCTR2300070445) and date of registration (2023-04-12).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Supportive Care in Cancer
Supportive Care in Cancer 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
751
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Supportive Care in Cancer provides members of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and all other interested individuals, groups and institutions with the most recent scientific and social information on all aspects of supportive care in cancer patients. It covers primarily medical, technical and surgical topics concerning supportive therapy and care which may supplement or substitute basic cancer treatment at all stages of the disease. Nursing, rehabilitative, psychosocial and spiritual issues of support are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信