激励措施对sti测试吸收的有效性:澳大利亚中部偏远地区土著和托雷斯海峡岛民青年的试验(2015-2020)。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Kate Whitford, Bronwyn Silver, Handan Wand, Stephen Bell, Skye McGregor, Basil Donovan, Christopher Fairley, Rebecca Guy, Nathan Ryder, John Boffa, James Ward, John Kaldor
{"title":"激励措施对sti测试吸收的有效性:澳大利亚中部偏远地区土著和托雷斯海峡岛民青年的试验(2015-2020)。","authors":"Kate Whitford, Bronwyn Silver, Handan Wand, Stephen Bell, Skye McGregor, Basil Donovan, Christopher Fairley, Rebecca Guy, Nathan Ryder, John Boffa, James Ward, John Kaldor","doi":"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STIs) cause a substantial disease burden worldwide, and disproportionately impact young people. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are a priority population in STI testing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The More Options for STI Testing (MOST) trial evaluated whether providing an incentive impacted STI testing rates in select central Australian communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 to 29 years were eligible for a A$30 phone voucher if they had an STI test at a participating Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care clinic. An interrupted time series analysis examined monthly STI test counts for chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis from 2015 to 2020, to determine whether testing increased during the incentives phase (2018-2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 10,457 visits to the clinic in which an STI test was conducted, 5,110 of which were during the incentives period. A total of 1,526 incentives were provided to eligible clients. The baseline and incentives periods were each divided into two phases to account for new clinic openings and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among men, average monthly visits for an STI test were 32.6 (baseline phase 1), 44.1 (baseline phase 2), 50.8 (incentives phase), and 35.4 (incentives/COVID-19 phase). Women had 93.5, 111.3, 118.8 and 113.4 visits respectively. No significant change in STI testing was observed during the incentives phase. The proportion of visits for an STI test where an incentive was paid (coverage) varied by month, from 36% to 76% of consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited impact of incentives could be explained by low coverage, or that the incentive was not motivating enough to overcome STI testing barriers. Future studies should investigate alternative methods of increasing STI testing in remote central Australia, including through primary care clinics.</p>","PeriodicalId":21837,"journal":{"name":"Sexually transmitted diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFFECTIVENESS OF INCENTIVES ON STI TESTING UPTAKE: A TRIAL AMONG ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER YOUNG PEOPLE IN REMOTE CENTRAL AUSTRALIA (2015-2020).\",\"authors\":\"Kate Whitford, Bronwyn Silver, Handan Wand, Stephen Bell, Skye McGregor, Basil Donovan, Christopher Fairley, Rebecca Guy, Nathan Ryder, John Boffa, James Ward, John Kaldor\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STIs) cause a substantial disease burden worldwide, and disproportionately impact young people. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are a priority population in STI testing guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The More Options for STI Testing (MOST) trial evaluated whether providing an incentive impacted STI testing rates in select central Australian communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 to 29 years were eligible for a A$30 phone voucher if they had an STI test at a participating Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care clinic. An interrupted time series analysis examined monthly STI test counts for chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis from 2015 to 2020, to determine whether testing increased during the incentives phase (2018-2020).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were a total of 10,457 visits to the clinic in which an STI test was conducted, 5,110 of which were during the incentives period. A total of 1,526 incentives were provided to eligible clients. The baseline and incentives periods were each divided into two phases to account for new clinic openings and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among men, average monthly visits for an STI test were 32.6 (baseline phase 1), 44.1 (baseline phase 2), 50.8 (incentives phase), and 35.4 (incentives/COVID-19 phase). Women had 93.5, 111.3, 118.8 and 113.4 visits respectively. No significant change in STI testing was observed during the incentives phase. The proportion of visits for an STI test where an incentive was paid (coverage) varied by month, from 36% to 76% of consultations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The limited impact of incentives could be explained by low coverage, or that the incentive was not motivating enough to overcome STI testing barriers. Future studies should investigate alternative methods of increasing STI testing in remote central Australia, including through primary care clinics.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21837,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexually transmitted diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002254\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexually transmitted diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/OLQ.0000000000002254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:细菌性传播感染(STIs)在世界范围内造成了巨大的疾病负担,对年轻人的影响尤为严重。在澳大利亚,土著人和托雷斯海峡岛民是性病检测指南中的优先人群。方法:STI检测的更多选择(MOST)试验评估是否提供激励影响STI检测率在选定的澳大利亚中部社区。16岁至29岁的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民如果在参与的土著社区控制的初级保健诊所进行性传播感染检测,就有资格获得30澳元的电话代金券。一项中断时间序列分析检查了2015年至2020年衣原体、淋病或梅毒的每月性传播感染检测计数,以确定在激励阶段(2018-2020年)检测是否增加。结果:总共有10457人到进行STI检测的诊所就诊,其中5110人是在奖励期间。共向合资格的客户提供1,526项奖励。基准期和激励期分别分为两个阶段,以考虑新诊所开业和COVID-19大流行。在男性中,平均每月接受性传播感染检测的次数为32.6次(基线阶段1)、44.1次(基线阶段2)、50.8次(奖励阶段)和35.4次(奖励/COVID-19阶段)。女性分别为93.5次、111.3次、118.8次和113.4次。在激励阶段,STI测试没有明显变化。支付奖励(覆盖范围)的性传播感染检查就诊比例按月变化,从36%到76%不等。结论:激励措施的有限影响可以解释为低覆盖率,或者激励措施不足以克服STI检测障碍。未来的研究应该调查在澳大利亚中部偏远地区增加性传播感染检测的替代方法,包括通过初级保健诊所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EFFECTIVENESS OF INCENTIVES ON STI TESTING UPTAKE: A TRIAL AMONG ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER YOUNG PEOPLE IN REMOTE CENTRAL AUSTRALIA (2015-2020).

Background: Bacterial sexually transmissible infections (STIs) cause a substantial disease burden worldwide, and disproportionately impact young people. In Australia, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are a priority population in STI testing guidelines.

Methods: The More Options for STI Testing (MOST) trial evaluated whether providing an incentive impacted STI testing rates in select central Australian communities. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 16 to 29 years were eligible for a A$30 phone voucher if they had an STI test at a participating Aboriginal community-controlled primary health care clinic. An interrupted time series analysis examined monthly STI test counts for chlamydia, gonorrhoea or syphilis from 2015 to 2020, to determine whether testing increased during the incentives phase (2018-2020).

Results: There were a total of 10,457 visits to the clinic in which an STI test was conducted, 5,110 of which were during the incentives period. A total of 1,526 incentives were provided to eligible clients. The baseline and incentives periods were each divided into two phases to account for new clinic openings and the COVID-19 pandemic. Among men, average monthly visits for an STI test were 32.6 (baseline phase 1), 44.1 (baseline phase 2), 50.8 (incentives phase), and 35.4 (incentives/COVID-19 phase). Women had 93.5, 111.3, 118.8 and 113.4 visits respectively. No significant change in STI testing was observed during the incentives phase. The proportion of visits for an STI test where an incentive was paid (coverage) varied by month, from 36% to 76% of consultations.

Conclusions: The limited impact of incentives could be explained by low coverage, or that the incentive was not motivating enough to overcome STI testing barriers. Future studies should investigate alternative methods of increasing STI testing in remote central Australia, including through primary care clinics.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexually transmitted diseases
Sexually transmitted diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
16.10%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Sexually Transmitted Diseases, the official journal of the American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association​, publishes peer-reviewed, original articles on clinical, laboratory, immunologic, epidemiologic, behavioral, public health, and historical topics pertaining to sexually transmitted diseases and related fields. Reports from the CDC and NIH provide up-to-the-minute information. A highly respected editorial board is composed of prominent scientists who are leaders in this rapidly changing field. Included in each issue are studies and developments from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信