{"title":"大鼠硬膜外脊髓背侧和腹侧刺激的激活和选择性比较:一项计算模型研究。","authors":"Dinglong Yan, Zheshan Guo, Haipeng Liu, Xiao Wang, Fengyan Liang, Jing Jie, Ming Yin","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-19555-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) enhances motor function recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) by modulating distinct spinal pathways through dorsal epidural electrical stimulation (dEES) and ventral epidural electrical stimulation (vEES). The characteristics between dEES and vEES remain insufficiently explored. To address this, a rat spinal computational model was developed, integrating finite element analysis and nerve fiber modeling to simulate the effects of dEES and vEES. The potential distribution generated by EES was coupled with Aα-sensory and α-motor fibers to compute thresholds, saturation amplitudes, and selectivity indices across stimulation modes. The analysis showed that dEES exhibited lower thresholds and saturation amplitudes, while vEES achieved higher muscle selectivity. Multipolar stimulation dispersed currents across multiple spinal segments, reducing target muscle selectivity and increasing thresholds and saturation amplitudes compared to monopolar stimulation. Although stimulation frequency had little effect on selectivity in both dEES and vEES, higher frequencies in dEES reduced the stimulation intensity required to achieve maximum selectivity. These findings reveal key differences in activation characteristics between dEES and vEES and highlight their potential roles in neuromodulation. Most importantly, we provided a fiber-level explanation for these differences in rats and supplemented our findings with a comparative analysis of previous studies. These insights lay a foundation for future rodent experiments aimed at optimizing epidural stimulation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"35711"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518515/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of activation and selectivity in dorsal and ventral epidural spinal cord stimulation in rats: a computational modeling study.\",\"authors\":\"Dinglong Yan, Zheshan Guo, Haipeng Liu, Xiao Wang, Fengyan Liang, Jing Jie, Ming Yin\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-19555-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) enhances motor function recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) by modulating distinct spinal pathways through dorsal epidural electrical stimulation (dEES) and ventral epidural electrical stimulation (vEES). The characteristics between dEES and vEES remain insufficiently explored. To address this, a rat spinal computational model was developed, integrating finite element analysis and nerve fiber modeling to simulate the effects of dEES and vEES. The potential distribution generated by EES was coupled with Aα-sensory and α-motor fibers to compute thresholds, saturation amplitudes, and selectivity indices across stimulation modes. The analysis showed that dEES exhibited lower thresholds and saturation amplitudes, while vEES achieved higher muscle selectivity. Multipolar stimulation dispersed currents across multiple spinal segments, reducing target muscle selectivity and increasing thresholds and saturation amplitudes compared to monopolar stimulation. Although stimulation frequency had little effect on selectivity in both dEES and vEES, higher frequencies in dEES reduced the stimulation intensity required to achieve maximum selectivity. These findings reveal key differences in activation characteristics between dEES and vEES and highlight their potential roles in neuromodulation. Most importantly, we provided a fiber-level explanation for these differences in rats and supplemented our findings with a comparative analysis of previous studies. These insights lay a foundation for future rodent experiments aimed at optimizing epidural stimulation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"35711\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12518515/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19555-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-19555-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparison of activation and selectivity in dorsal and ventral epidural spinal cord stimulation in rats: a computational modeling study.
Epidural electrical stimulation (EES) enhances motor function recovery after spinal cord injury (SCI) by modulating distinct spinal pathways through dorsal epidural electrical stimulation (dEES) and ventral epidural electrical stimulation (vEES). The characteristics between dEES and vEES remain insufficiently explored. To address this, a rat spinal computational model was developed, integrating finite element analysis and nerve fiber modeling to simulate the effects of dEES and vEES. The potential distribution generated by EES was coupled with Aα-sensory and α-motor fibers to compute thresholds, saturation amplitudes, and selectivity indices across stimulation modes. The analysis showed that dEES exhibited lower thresholds and saturation amplitudes, while vEES achieved higher muscle selectivity. Multipolar stimulation dispersed currents across multiple spinal segments, reducing target muscle selectivity and increasing thresholds and saturation amplitudes compared to monopolar stimulation. Although stimulation frequency had little effect on selectivity in both dEES and vEES, higher frequencies in dEES reduced the stimulation intensity required to achieve maximum selectivity. These findings reveal key differences in activation characteristics between dEES and vEES and highlight their potential roles in neuromodulation. Most importantly, we provided a fiber-level explanation for these differences in rats and supplemented our findings with a comparative analysis of previous studies. These insights lay a foundation for future rodent experiments aimed at optimizing epidural stimulation strategies.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.