使用BI-RADS v2025手册审核术前乳腺MRI疾病程度评估的可行性

IF 15.2 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiology Pub Date : 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.243803
Ethan O Cohen, Hilda H Tso, Kyungmin Shin, Sarah R Martaindale, Ashley C Bragg, Kanchan A Phalak, Rachel E Perry, Jia Sun, Jessica W T Leung
{"title":"使用BI-RADS v2025手册审核术前乳腺MRI疾病程度评估的可行性","authors":"Ethan O Cohen, Hilda H Tso, Kyungmin Shin, Sarah R Martaindale, Ashley C Bragg, Kanchan A Phalak, Rachel E Perry, Jia Sun, Jessica W T Leung","doi":"10.1148/radiol.243803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The forthcoming Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) version 2025 (hereafter, v2025) manual recommends auditing breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate the extent of disease in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of this recommended audit using preoperative breast MRI examinations performed over 2 years, report the calculated metrics, and identify any clinical or imaging characteristics associated with improved MRI performance metrics. Materials and Methods Consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 2021 to December 2022 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed, excluding screening, diagnostic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, and nondiagnostic or incomplete preoperative MRI examinations. Recommended audit calculations were performed as described in the BI-RADS v2025 manual: abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) (percentage of positive preoperative MRI examinations), positive predictive value of biopsies recommended (PPV2) (percentage of all distinct BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with a tissue diagnosis of cancer at image-guided biopsy), positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) (percentage of BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with preoperative image-guided biopsy revealing a tissue diagnosis of cancer), and additional cancer detection rate (ACDR) (number of additional malignant lesions diagnosed beyond the primary cancer per 1000 MRI examinations). Total time collecting data and performing calculations was recorded. Characteristics of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with malignancy. Results A total of 1533 preoperative MRI examinations were included (median patient age, 54.6 years; IQR, 45.5-65.2 years; all female), with 464 MRI examinations revealing 609 suspicious breast findings. Subsequent image-guided biopsy for 432 of these findings revealed 139 malignancies. The overall AIR was 30.3% (95% CI: 28.0, 32.6), overall PPV2 was 22.8% (95% CI: 19.5, 26.1), overall PPV3 was 32.2% (95% CI: 27.8, 36.6), and overall ACDR was 90.7 per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 74.3, 107.1). Seven radiologists spent a combined total of 141 hours collecting data and performing audit calculations. Older patient age (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; <i>P</i> < .001) and presence of lesions ipsilateral to the index malignancy (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.75; <i>P</i> = .005) were associated with higher odds of malignancy. Conclusion Auditing of preoperative breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate disease extent, as recommended in the forthcoming BI-RADS v2025 manual, was feasible and yielded metrics within expected ranges based on limited prior data. © RSNA, 2025.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"317 1","pages":"e243803"},"PeriodicalIF":15.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Auditing Preoperative Breast MRI for Extent-of-Disease Evaluation Using the BI-RADS v2025 Manual.\",\"authors\":\"Ethan O Cohen, Hilda H Tso, Kyungmin Shin, Sarah R Martaindale, Ashley C Bragg, Kanchan A Phalak, Rachel E Perry, Jia Sun, Jessica W T Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1148/radiol.243803\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Background The forthcoming Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) version 2025 (hereafter, v2025) manual recommends auditing breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate the extent of disease in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of this recommended audit using preoperative breast MRI examinations performed over 2 years, report the calculated metrics, and identify any clinical or imaging characteristics associated with improved MRI performance metrics. Materials and Methods Consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 2021 to December 2022 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed, excluding screening, diagnostic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, and nondiagnostic or incomplete preoperative MRI examinations. Recommended audit calculations were performed as described in the BI-RADS v2025 manual: abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) (percentage of positive preoperative MRI examinations), positive predictive value of biopsies recommended (PPV2) (percentage of all distinct BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with a tissue diagnosis of cancer at image-guided biopsy), positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) (percentage of BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with preoperative image-guided biopsy revealing a tissue diagnosis of cancer), and additional cancer detection rate (ACDR) (number of additional malignant lesions diagnosed beyond the primary cancer per 1000 MRI examinations). Total time collecting data and performing calculations was recorded. Characteristics of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with malignancy. Results A total of 1533 preoperative MRI examinations were included (median patient age, 54.6 years; IQR, 45.5-65.2 years; all female), with 464 MRI examinations revealing 609 suspicious breast findings. Subsequent image-guided biopsy for 432 of these findings revealed 139 malignancies. The overall AIR was 30.3% (95% CI: 28.0, 32.6), overall PPV2 was 22.8% (95% CI: 19.5, 26.1), overall PPV3 was 32.2% (95% CI: 27.8, 36.6), and overall ACDR was 90.7 per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 74.3, 107.1). Seven radiologists spent a combined total of 141 hours collecting data and performing audit calculations. Older patient age (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; <i>P</i> < .001) and presence of lesions ipsilateral to the index malignancy (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.75; <i>P</i> = .005) were associated with higher odds of malignancy. Conclusion Auditing of preoperative breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate disease extent, as recommended in the forthcoming BI-RADS v2025 manual, was feasible and yielded metrics within expected ranges based on limited prior data. © RSNA, 2025.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology\",\"volume\":\"317 1\",\"pages\":\"e243803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":15.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243803\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.243803","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

即将出版的乳腺成像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS) 2025版(以下简称v2025)手册建议对新诊断为乳腺癌的女性进行乳房MRI检查,以评估疾病的程度。目的:探讨采用术前2年以上乳房MRI检查进行推荐审计的可行性,报告计算指标,并确定与改善MRI表现指标相关的任何临床或影像学特征。材料和方法回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年12月在德克萨斯大学MD安德森癌症中心进行的连续乳腺MRI检查,不包括筛查、诊断、新辅助化疗反应和非诊断性或不完全术前MRI检查。建议的审计计算按照BI-RADS v2025手册的描述进行:异常解释率(AIR)(术前MRI检查阳性的百分比),推荐活检阳性预测值(PPV2)(所有不同的BI-RADS 4或5类发现的百分比,没有检查,在图像引导下活检显示组织诊断为癌症),活检阳性预测值(PPV3) (BI-RADS 4或5类发现的百分比,没有检查,术前图像引导活检显示组织诊断为癌症),以及额外的癌症检出率(ACDR)(每1000次核磁共振检查中除原发癌症外诊断出的额外恶性病变的数量)。记录收集数据和执行计算的总时间。采用Wilcoxon秩和检验和Fisher精确检验比较BI-RADS良、恶性4、5型病变的特征。使用逻辑回归来确定与恶性肿瘤相关的特征。结果共纳入术前MRI检查1533例(患者中位年龄54.6岁,IQR 45.5 ~ 65.2岁,均为女性),其中MRI检查464例,发现可疑乳腺病变609例。随后对其中432例进行图像引导活检,发现139例恶性肿瘤。总AIR为30.3% (95% CI: 28.0, 32.6),总PPV2为22.8% (95% CI: 19.5, 26.1),总PPV3为32.2% (95% CI: 27.8, 36.6),总ACDR为90.7 / 1000次检查(95% CI: 74.3, 107.1)。7名放射科医生总共花了141个小时收集数据并进行审计计算。老年患者的年龄(优势比1.04;95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; P < 0.001)和与恶性肿瘤指数同侧病变的存在(优势比1.81;95% CI: 1.20, 2.75; P = 0.005)与较高的恶性肿瘤几率相关。根据即将出版的BI-RADS v2025手册的建议,对术前乳腺MRI检查进行审计以评估疾病程度是可行的,并且基于有限的先前数据,得出的指标在预期范围内。©rsna, 2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Feasibility of Auditing Preoperative Breast MRI for Extent-of-Disease Evaluation Using the BI-RADS v2025 Manual.

Background The forthcoming Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) version 2025 (hereafter, v2025) manual recommends auditing breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate the extent of disease in women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Purpose To investigate the feasibility of this recommended audit using preoperative breast MRI examinations performed over 2 years, report the calculated metrics, and identify any clinical or imaging characteristics associated with improved MRI performance metrics. Materials and Methods Consecutive breast MRI examinations performed from January 2021 to December 2022 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center were retrospectively reviewed, excluding screening, diagnostic, neoadjuvant chemotherapy response, and nondiagnostic or incomplete preoperative MRI examinations. Recommended audit calculations were performed as described in the BI-RADS v2025 manual: abnormal interpretation rate (AIR) (percentage of positive preoperative MRI examinations), positive predictive value of biopsies recommended (PPV2) (percentage of all distinct BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with a tissue diagnosis of cancer at image-guided biopsy), positive predictive value of biopsies performed (PPV3) (percentage of BI-RADS category 4 or 5 findings, not examinations, with preoperative image-guided biopsy revealing a tissue diagnosis of cancer), and additional cancer detection rate (ACDR) (number of additional malignant lesions diagnosed beyond the primary cancer per 1000 MRI examinations). Total time collecting data and performing calculations was recorded. Characteristics of benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 or 5 lesions were compared using the Wilcoxon rank sum test and Fisher exact test. Logistic regression was used to determine characteristics associated with malignancy. Results A total of 1533 preoperative MRI examinations were included (median patient age, 54.6 years; IQR, 45.5-65.2 years; all female), with 464 MRI examinations revealing 609 suspicious breast findings. Subsequent image-guided biopsy for 432 of these findings revealed 139 malignancies. The overall AIR was 30.3% (95% CI: 28.0, 32.6), overall PPV2 was 22.8% (95% CI: 19.5, 26.1), overall PPV3 was 32.2% (95% CI: 27.8, 36.6), and overall ACDR was 90.7 per 1000 examinations (95% CI: 74.3, 107.1). Seven radiologists spent a combined total of 141 hours collecting data and performing audit calculations. Older patient age (odds ratio, 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02, 1.05; P < .001) and presence of lesions ipsilateral to the index malignancy (odds ratio, 1.81; 95% CI: 1.20, 2.75; P = .005) were associated with higher odds of malignancy. Conclusion Auditing of preoperative breast MRI examinations performed to evaluate disease extent, as recommended in the forthcoming BI-RADS v2025 manual, was feasible and yielded metrics within expected ranges based on limited prior data. © RSNA, 2025.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信