急性创伤性脊髓损伤后腕伸肌恢复的预测因素:一项模型系统复制研究。

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
PM&R Pub Date : 2025-10-14 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.70038
Brandon M Johnson, Nathaniel K Johnson, Yan Li, Ronald K Reeves, Steven Kirshblum, Ryan Solinsky
{"title":"急性创伤性脊髓损伤后腕伸肌恢复的预测因素:一项模型系统复制研究。","authors":"Brandon M Johnson, Nathaniel K Johnson, Yan Li, Ronald K Reeves, Steven Kirshblum, Ryan Solinsky","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.70038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After high-level spinal cord injury (SCI), motor recovery of wrist extensors has significant functional consequences as it can facilitate grasp through tenodesis. A small seminal study from 1993 established widely used prognostic rules for wrist extensor recovery, though these have not been replicated with larger, real-world samples since inception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prognostic value of initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination, C5 motor strength, and C6 motor strength on predicting 1-year ipsilateral wrist extensor motor recovery for patients with SCI with neurological level of C4 or C5.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort replication study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>SCI Model Systems.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35,675 total individuals with acute traumatic SCI with 219 cases of initial wrist extensor weakness (0/5-2/5) meeting inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Recovery of wrist extensor strength to ≥3/5 at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 57% (95% CI, 47.4%-66.1%) and 66% (56.0%-75.1%) if initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination was present, 61% (52.7%-69.3%) and 82% (71.4%-89.7%) if initial C5 myotome strength was at least antigravity, and 74% (63.7%-82.5%) and 74% (65.5%-81.4%) if initial C6 myotome strength was at least a 1/5 or 2/5. Synthesizing these three rules, an updated branched nomogram for functional wrist extensor recovery prediction was created.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In isolation, none of the previously established wrist extensor motor recovery predictive rules had as high of a prognostic value when using a larger dataset. As such, singular reliance on these prediction rules to identify who will gain 1-year antigravity wrist extension should be approached with decreased certainty. The best positive and negative predictors were trace C6 strength and absent C5 strength, respectively. An updated nomogram provides more nuanced prognostic information to guide clinical care following acute SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictors of wrist extensor muscle recovery following acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A model systems replication study.\",\"authors\":\"Brandon M Johnson, Nathaniel K Johnson, Yan Li, Ronald K Reeves, Steven Kirshblum, Ryan Solinsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pmrj.70038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>After high-level spinal cord injury (SCI), motor recovery of wrist extensors has significant functional consequences as it can facilitate grasp through tenodesis. A small seminal study from 1993 established widely used prognostic rules for wrist extensor recovery, though these have not been replicated with larger, real-world samples since inception.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the prognostic value of initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination, C5 motor strength, and C6 motor strength on predicting 1-year ipsilateral wrist extensor motor recovery for patients with SCI with neurological level of C4 or C5.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort replication study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>SCI Model Systems.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>35,675 total individuals with acute traumatic SCI with 219 cases of initial wrist extensor weakness (0/5-2/5) meeting inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Not applicable.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Recovery of wrist extensor strength to ≥3/5 at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 57% (95% CI, 47.4%-66.1%) and 66% (56.0%-75.1%) if initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination was present, 61% (52.7%-69.3%) and 82% (71.4%-89.7%) if initial C5 myotome strength was at least antigravity, and 74% (63.7%-82.5%) and 74% (65.5%-81.4%) if initial C6 myotome strength was at least a 1/5 or 2/5. Synthesizing these three rules, an updated branched nomogram for functional wrist extensor recovery prediction was created.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In isolation, none of the previously established wrist extensor motor recovery predictive rules had as high of a prognostic value when using a larger dataset. As such, singular reliance on these prediction rules to identify who will gain 1-year antigravity wrist extension should be approached with decreased certainty. The best positive and negative predictors were trace C6 strength and absent C5 strength, respectively. An updated nomogram provides more nuanced prognostic information to guide clinical care following acute SCI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PM&R\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PM&R\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70038\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.70038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高位脊髓损伤(SCI)后,腕伸肌的运动恢复具有重要的功能影响,因为它可以通过肌腱固定术促进抓握。1993年的一项小型开创性研究建立了广泛使用的腕伸肌恢复预后规则,尽管这些规则自成立以来尚未在更大的真实样本中得到复制。目的:探讨C5初辨、C5运动强度、C6运动强度对脊髓损伤伴C4或C5神经水平患者1年同侧腕伸肌运动恢复的预测价值。设计:回顾性队列重复研究。设置:SCI模型系统。参与者:35,675例急性外伤性脊髓损伤患者,219例初始腕伸肌无力(0/5-2/5)符合纳入标准。干预:不适用。主要观察指标:1年后腕伸肌强度恢复至≥3/5。结果:C5初显钝辨的阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为57% (95% CI, 47.4% ~ 66.1%)和66% (56.0% ~ 75.1%),C5初显肌肌瘤强度≥反重力时的阳性预测值分别为61%(52.7% ~ 69.3%)和82% (71.4% ~ 89.7%),C6初显肌肌瘤强度≥1/5或2/5时的阳性预测值分别为74%(63.7% ~ 82.5%)和74%(65.5% ~ 81.4%)。综合这三条规则,建立了一个用于功能性腕伸肌恢复预测的分支图。结论:单独来看,先前建立的腕部伸肌运动恢复预测规则在使用更大的数据集时都没有如此高的预测价值。因此,单一地依赖这些预测规则来确定谁将获得1年的反重力手腕伸展,应该降低确定性。阳性和阴性预测因子分别为微量C6强度和缺失C5强度。更新的nomogram预后图为指导急性脊髓损伤后的临床护理提供了更细致入微的预后信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictors of wrist extensor muscle recovery following acute traumatic spinal cord injury: A model systems replication study.

Background: After high-level spinal cord injury (SCI), motor recovery of wrist extensors has significant functional consequences as it can facilitate grasp through tenodesis. A small seminal study from 1993 established widely used prognostic rules for wrist extensor recovery, though these have not been replicated with larger, real-world samples since inception.

Objective: To determine the prognostic value of initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination, C5 motor strength, and C6 motor strength on predicting 1-year ipsilateral wrist extensor motor recovery for patients with SCI with neurological level of C4 or C5.

Design: Retrospective cohort replication study.

Setting: SCI Model Systems.

Participants: 35,675 total individuals with acute traumatic SCI with 219 cases of initial wrist extensor weakness (0/5-2/5) meeting inclusion criteria.

Intervention: Not applicable.

Main outcome measure: Recovery of wrist extensor strength to ≥3/5 at 1 year.

Results: The positive predictive and negative predictive values were 57% (95% CI, 47.4%-66.1%) and 66% (56.0%-75.1%) if initial C5 sharp-dull discrimination was present, 61% (52.7%-69.3%) and 82% (71.4%-89.7%) if initial C5 myotome strength was at least antigravity, and 74% (63.7%-82.5%) and 74% (65.5%-81.4%) if initial C6 myotome strength was at least a 1/5 or 2/5. Synthesizing these three rules, an updated branched nomogram for functional wrist extensor recovery prediction was created.

Conclusions: In isolation, none of the previously established wrist extensor motor recovery predictive rules had as high of a prognostic value when using a larger dataset. As such, singular reliance on these prediction rules to identify who will gain 1-year antigravity wrist extension should be approached with decreased certainty. The best positive and negative predictors were trace C6 strength and absent C5 strength, respectively. An updated nomogram provides more nuanced prognostic information to guide clinical care following acute SCI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信