美国慈善食品系统中营养干预的实施决定因素:范围审查。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Ruyu Liu, Shariwa Oke, Qingyu Shao, Matthew R Kibbee
{"title":"美国慈善食品系统中营养干预的实施决定因素:范围审查。","authors":"Ruyu Liu, Shariwa Oke, Qingyu Shao, Matthew R Kibbee","doi":"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This scoping review aims to describe the characteristics of nutrition interventions in the charitable food system (CFS), and to map knowledge gaps on the barriers and facilitators to implementing these interventions. Originally an emergency food source, the CFS has become the main food source for the food-insecure population in the United States. Nutrition interventions in this setting have proliferated; however, knowledge of their implementation remained fragmented. A search was conducted on November 22, 2023, in 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CAB Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) and 4 gray literature sources (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, PubAg, Healthy Eating Research Database, and Feeding America). Backward and forward citations of all included studies were screened for relevance. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the United States, did not involve the CFS, or did not address implementation. There were no restrictions on research design or publication year. Findings on implementation determinants were summarized based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A total of 79 studies and 71 distinct interventions were included. Over half of the interventions took place in urban areas. Food banks and pantries were the most common settings. Most interventions were multicomponent, featuring nutrition and health education, behavioral economics, produce prescriptions, food provision, and nutrition policy and guideline modifications. Common implementation barriers were related to limited resources at CFS organizations and intervention participant characteristics. Common facilitators included partnerships and connections, meeting participants' needs, and alignment between the intervention's mission and that of the CFS organizations. Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps in underexplored implementation determinants, such as intervention deliverers' needs, intraorganizational communication, and external pressures. Additionally, there is a need to examine the implementation of nutrition interventions in rural areas and soup kitchens.</p>","PeriodicalId":19469,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation Determinants of Nutrition Interventions in the Charitable Food System in the United States: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Ruyu Liu, Shariwa Oke, Qingyu Shao, Matthew R Kibbee\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nutrit/nuaf183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This scoping review aims to describe the characteristics of nutrition interventions in the charitable food system (CFS), and to map knowledge gaps on the barriers and facilitators to implementing these interventions. Originally an emergency food source, the CFS has become the main food source for the food-insecure population in the United States. Nutrition interventions in this setting have proliferated; however, knowledge of their implementation remained fragmented. A search was conducted on November 22, 2023, in 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CAB Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) and 4 gray literature sources (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, PubAg, Healthy Eating Research Database, and Feeding America). Backward and forward citations of all included studies were screened for relevance. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the United States, did not involve the CFS, or did not address implementation. There were no restrictions on research design or publication year. Findings on implementation determinants were summarized based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A total of 79 studies and 71 distinct interventions were included. Over half of the interventions took place in urban areas. Food banks and pantries were the most common settings. Most interventions were multicomponent, featuring nutrition and health education, behavioral economics, produce prescriptions, food provision, and nutrition policy and guideline modifications. Common implementation barriers were related to limited resources at CFS organizations and intervention participant characteristics. Common facilitators included partnerships and connections, meeting participants' needs, and alignment between the intervention's mission and that of the CFS organizations. Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps in underexplored implementation determinants, such as intervention deliverers' needs, intraorganizational communication, and external pressures. Additionally, there is a need to examine the implementation of nutrition interventions in rural areas and soup kitchens.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19469,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf183\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuaf183","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本范围审查旨在描述慈善食品系统(CFS)营养干预措施的特点,并绘制关于实施这些干预措施的障碍和促进因素的知识差距。食品安全中心最初是一个紧急食品来源,现已成为美国粮食不安全人口的主要食品来源。在这种情况下,营养干预措施激增;然而,对其实施的了解仍然是支离破碎的。我们于2023年11月22日检索了7个数据库(PubMed、Web of Science Core Collection、CAB Abstracts、BIOSIS Previews、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus)和4个灰色文献源(ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global、PubAg、Healthy Eating Research Database和Feeding America)。对所有纳入研究的前后引文进行相关性筛选。排除在美国境外进行的研究,不涉及安全中心或不涉及实施的研究。对研究设计和发表年份没有限制。在实施研究综合框架的基础上总结了关于实施决定因素的研究结果。总共纳入了79项研究和71项不同的干预措施。半数以上的干预措施发生在城市地区。食物银行和食品储藏室是最常见的场所。大多数干预措施是多成分的,包括营养和健康教育、行为经济学、生产处方、食物供应以及营养政策和指南修改。常见的实施障碍与慢性疲劳综合症组织有限的资源和干预参与者的特征有关。常见的促进因素包括伙伴关系和联系、满足参与者的需求以及使干预行动的使命与粮安委组织的使命保持一致。需要进一步的研究来解决未充分探索的实施决定因素方面的知识差距,例如干预提供者的需求、组织内部沟通和外部压力。此外,有必要审查在农村地区和施粥所实施营养干预措施的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation Determinants of Nutrition Interventions in the Charitable Food System in the United States: A Scoping Review.

This scoping review aims to describe the characteristics of nutrition interventions in the charitable food system (CFS), and to map knowledge gaps on the barriers and facilitators to implementing these interventions. Originally an emergency food source, the CFS has become the main food source for the food-insecure population in the United States. Nutrition interventions in this setting have proliferated; however, knowledge of their implementation remained fragmented. A search was conducted on November 22, 2023, in 7 databases (PubMed, Web of Science Core Collection, CAB Abstracts, BIOSIS Previews, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus) and 4 gray literature sources (ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, PubAg, Healthy Eating Research Database, and Feeding America). Backward and forward citations of all included studies were screened for relevance. Studies were excluded if they were conducted outside the United States, did not involve the CFS, or did not address implementation. There were no restrictions on research design or publication year. Findings on implementation determinants were summarized based on the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. A total of 79 studies and 71 distinct interventions were included. Over half of the interventions took place in urban areas. Food banks and pantries were the most common settings. Most interventions were multicomponent, featuring nutrition and health education, behavioral economics, produce prescriptions, food provision, and nutrition policy and guideline modifications. Common implementation barriers were related to limited resources at CFS organizations and intervention participant characteristics. Common facilitators included partnerships and connections, meeting participants' needs, and alignment between the intervention's mission and that of the CFS organizations. Further research is needed to address knowledge gaps in underexplored implementation determinants, such as intervention deliverers' needs, intraorganizational communication, and external pressures. Additionally, there is a need to examine the implementation of nutrition interventions in rural areas and soup kitchens.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition reviews
Nutrition reviews 医学-营养学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.60%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Reviews is a highly cited, monthly, international, peer-reviewed journal that specializes in the publication of authoritative and critical literature reviews on current and emerging topics in nutrition science, food science, clinical nutrition, and nutrition policy. Readers of Nutrition Reviews include nutrition scientists, biomedical researchers, clinical and dietetic practitioners, and advanced students of nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信