尼日利亚中北部比达联邦医疗中心一次剖宫产后的分娩试验结果。

IF 1.4 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa
{"title":"尼日利亚中北部比达联邦医疗中心一次剖宫产后的分娩试验结果。","authors":"Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa","doi":"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of trial of labour after one previous cesarean section at Federal Medical Centre, Bida, north central, Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定在尼日利亚比达联邦医疗中心进行过一次剖宫产(C/S)的妇女在试产后的成功率和胎母结局。材料和方法:本研究是一项前瞻性队列研究,选取既往发生过C/S的妇女,在C/S后接受15个月的分娩试验。采用问卷调查的方式收集人口统计和病史资料。基于一系列变量,对剖宫产后阴道分娩(VBAC)的妇女和接受紧急重复C/S (ERCS)的妇女进行统计学比较,以确定差异和关联。结果:共纳入150例既往有一次C/S的妇女。在150名研究参与者中,105名(70.0%)达到了VBAC,而45名(30.0%)达到了ERCS。有过阴道分娩经历的女性实现VBAC的几率更高。分娩进展不佳是ERCS最常见的指征(17/45;37.8%)。腹部分娩后最常见的产妇并发症是产后出血(n=15, 33.3%),而会阴撕裂伤(n=26, 24.8%)在实现VBAC的妇女中最常见。与VBAC组相比,ERCS组的并发症明显更多。不同分娩方式的胎儿结局比较具有可比性,但进入特殊护理婴儿病房的新生儿更有可能通过ERCS出生(优势比5.231;95%可信区间1.247-21.950)。没有围产期或产妇死亡率。报告子宫破裂1例。结论:这些结果表明,即使在资源匮乏的情况下,在经过精心挑选的妇女中,也可以实现良好的分娩效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcome of trial of labour after one previous cesarean section at Federal Medical Centre, Bida, north central, Nigeria.

Objective: To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.

Material and methods: This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.

Results: A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.

Conclusion: These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is the official, open access publication of the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation and Turkish-German Gynecological Association and is published quarterly on March, June, September and December. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English language. Manuscripts are reviewed in accordance with “double-blind peer review” process for both reviewers and authors. The target audience of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association includes gynecologists and primary care physicians interested in gynecology practice. It publishes original works on all aspects of obstertrics and gynecology. The aim of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is to publish high quality original research articles. In addition to research articles, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, diagnostic puzzle are also published. Suggestions for new books are also welcomed. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association does not charge any fee for article submission or processing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信