Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa
{"title":"尼日利亚中北部比达联邦医疗中心一次剖宫产后的分娩试验结果。","authors":"Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa","doi":"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":17440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcome of trial of labour after one previous cesarean section at Federal Medical Centre, Bida, north central, Nigeria.\",\"authors\":\"Folorunsho Benard Adewale, Adebowale Samuel Adefemi, Adewale Olufemi Ashimi, Abdulkarim Omoyine Musa\",\"doi\":\"10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2025.2025-4-12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Outcome of trial of labour after one previous cesarean section at Federal Medical Centre, Bida, north central, Nigeria.
Objective: To determine the success rate and feto-maternal outcomes following trial of labor among women with one previous cesarean section (C/S) seen at the Federal Medical Centre, Bida, Nigeria.
Material and methods: This was a prospective cohort study among selected women with a previous C/S admitted for trial of labor after C/S over a 15 month period. Demographic and medical history data was collected by questionnaire. Women achieving vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) and those undergoing emergency repeat C/S (ERCS) were compared statistically for differences and associations based on a range of variables.
Results: A total of 150 women with one previous C/S were included. Out of 150 study participants, 105 (70.0%) achieved VBAC while 45 (30.0%) had ERCS. Women with previous vaginal delivery had higher odds of achieving VBAC. Poor progress of labor was the most common indication for ERCS (17/45; 37.8%). The most frequent maternal complication following abdominal delivery was post-partum hemorrhage (n=15; 33.3%) while perineal laceration (n=26;24.8%) was the commonest among women who achieved VBAC. The ERCS cohort suffered significantly more complications in comparison to those who had VBAC. Comparison of fetal outcomes by mode of delivery were comparable, except that neonates admitted into special care baby unit were more likely to have been born via ERCS (odds ratio 5.231; 95% confidence interval 1.247-21.950) compared to those born via VBAC. There was no perinatal or maternal mortality. However, one case of ruptured uterus was recorded.
Conclusion: These results demonstrated that good outcome following trial of labour is achievable among well selected women, even in low resource settings.
期刊介绍:
Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is the official, open access publication of the Turkish-German Gynecological Education and Research Foundation and Turkish-German Gynecological Association and is published quarterly on March, June, September and December. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English language. Manuscripts are reviewed in accordance with “double-blind peer review” process for both reviewers and authors. The target audience of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association includes gynecologists and primary care physicians interested in gynecology practice. It publishes original works on all aspects of obstertrics and gynecology. The aim of Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association is to publish high quality original research articles. In addition to research articles, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor, diagnostic puzzle are also published. Suggestions for new books are also welcomed. Journal of the Turkish-German Gynecological Association does not charge any fee for article submission or processing.