{"title":"多模态超声联合BI-RADS在乳腺非肿块性病变分类诊断中的应用。","authors":"Zengdi Yang, Yongyan Lyu, Yanting Yang, Cuiping Xu, Keke Zhang, Xuxu Yang, Feng Chen, Lanlan Cheng, Minglei Ren","doi":"10.1002/jcu.70115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multimodal ultrasound, including microvascular flow imaging (MVFI), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), in conjunction with the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for non-mass breast lesions (NMLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients who received treatment in our hospital from April 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively collected. All patients had complete pre-operative ultrasound BI-RADS, MVFI, SWE, and CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated; the diagnostic efficacy of the methods was compared, and the diagnostic performance of the subjects was plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS alone and the pathological results was very high, with a Kappa value of 0.806. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined diagnosis of MVFI-SWE-CEUS and BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS was 0.885 (p < 0.001) and 0.922 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS for the diagnosis of NMLs were higher than those of the diagnosis alone (p < 0.05), with 95.24%, 89.19%, 93.75%, 91.67%, and 93%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of multimodal ultrasound and BI-RADS provides a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for NMLs, offering a more comprehensive and reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating NMLs.</p>","PeriodicalId":15386,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Multimodal Ultrasound Combined With BI-RADS in Classification and Diagnosis of Non-Mass Breast Lesions.\",\"authors\":\"Zengdi Yang, Yongyan Lyu, Yanting Yang, Cuiping Xu, Keke Zhang, Xuxu Yang, Feng Chen, Lanlan Cheng, Minglei Ren\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcu.70115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The primary objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multimodal ultrasound, including microvascular flow imaging (MVFI), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), in conjunction with the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for non-mass breast lesions (NMLs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 100 patients who received treatment in our hospital from April 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively collected. All patients had complete pre-operative ultrasound BI-RADS, MVFI, SWE, and CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated; the diagnostic efficacy of the methods was compared, and the diagnostic performance of the subjects was plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The agreement between the BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS alone and the pathological results was very high, with a Kappa value of 0.806. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined diagnosis of MVFI-SWE-CEUS and BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS was 0.885 (p < 0.001) and 0.922 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS for the diagnosis of NMLs were higher than those of the diagnosis alone (p < 0.05), with 95.24%, 89.19%, 93.75%, 91.67%, and 93%, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The combination of multimodal ultrasound and BI-RADS provides a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for NMLs, offering a more comprehensive and reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating NMLs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70115\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.70115","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Application of Multimodal Ultrasound Combined With BI-RADS in Classification and Diagnosis of Non-Mass Breast Lesions.
Introduction: The primary objective of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of multimodal ultrasound, including microvascular flow imaging (MVFI), shear wave elastography (SWE), and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), in conjunction with the breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for non-mass breast lesions (NMLs).
Methods: A total of 100 patients who received treatment in our hospital from April 2021 to June 2024 were retrospectively collected. All patients had complete pre-operative ultrasound BI-RADS, MVFI, SWE, and CEUS. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated; the diagnostic efficacy of the methods was compared, and the diagnostic performance of the subjects was plotted.
Results: The agreement between the BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS alone and the pathological results was very high, with a Kappa value of 0.806. The area under the curve (AUC) of the combined diagnosis of MVFI-SWE-CEUS and BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS was 0.885 (p < 0.001) and 0.922 (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of BI-RADS-MVFI-SWE-CEUS for the diagnosis of NMLs were higher than those of the diagnosis alone (p < 0.05), with 95.24%, 89.19%, 93.75%, 91.67%, and 93%, respectively.
Conclusion: The combination of multimodal ultrasound and BI-RADS provides a significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity for NMLs, offering a more comprehensive and reliable diagnostic tool for evaluating NMLs.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Ultrasound (JCU) is an international journal dedicated to the worldwide dissemination of scientific information on diagnostic and therapeutic applications of medical sonography.
The scope of the journal includes--but is not limited to--the following areas: sonography of the gastrointestinal tract, genitourinary tract, vascular system, nervous system, head and neck, chest, breast, musculoskeletal system, and other superficial structures; Doppler applications; obstetric and pediatric applications; and interventional sonography. Studies comparing sonography with other imaging modalities are encouraged, as are studies evaluating the economic impact of sonography. Also within the journal''s scope are innovations and improvements in instrumentation and examination techniques and the use of contrast agents.
JCU publishes original research articles, case reports, pictorial essays, technical notes, and letters to the editor. The journal is also dedicated to being an educational resource for its readers, through the publication of review articles and various scientific contributions from members of the editorial board and other world-renowned experts in sonography.