RAS-TP53基因共改变的结直肠癌肝转移患者生存率较低。

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Judy Li, Giacomo Waller, Yunyun Qin, Allen T Yu, Thomas Li, Deborah Li, Rami Srouji, Camilo Correa-Gallego, Spiros Hiotis, Ganesh Gunasekaran, Joshua Leinwand, Neha L Lad, James Oh Park, Noah A Cohen
{"title":"RAS-TP53基因共改变的结直肠癌肝转移患者生存率较低。","authors":"Judy Li, Giacomo Waller, Yunyun Qin, Allen T Yu, Thomas Li, Deborah Li, Rami Srouji, Camilo Correa-Gallego, Spiros Hiotis, Ganesh Gunasekaran, Joshua Leinwand, Neha L Lad, James Oh Park, Noah A Cohen","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-18533-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing provides valuable information about mutations within colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) that impact survival. Existing data focus on prognostic implications of single gene mutations. This study assessed the impact of co-alterations on KRAS/NRAS and TP53 after CRLM resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with CRLM who underwent surgical management and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed to assess associations with clinical outcomes. Groups were stratified by the presence or absence of RAS-TP53 co-alterations (RTC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 155 patients with NGS data, with 42 patients (27%) harboring RTC. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The RTC patients had more right-side primary tumors (45% vs. 26%; P = 0.028), presented more frequently with synchronous CRLM (91% vs. 72%; P = 0.017), and were more often deemed initially unresectable (26% vs. 12%; P = 0.038). Medical and surgical management were comparable between the groups, with the majority of the patients receiving systemic therapy (97% overall) and undergoing wedge partial hepatectomies (59% overall). The RTC patients had worse recurrence-free and overall survival, and experienced extrahepatic recurrences sooner (median, 9 vs 14 months; P = 0.014). In the multivariate analyses, RTC (hazard ratio [HR, 2.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054-4.088; P = 0.035) and post-recurrence locoregional treatments (HR, 0.446; 95% CI 0.222-0.896; P = 0.023) were independently associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RTC patients presented more often with synchronous CRLM, and RTC also was associated with worse oncologic outcomes, suggestive of more aggressive tumor biology. Integration of genome-sequencing data beyond single gene mutations may provide important prognostic information for patients with CRLM to guide management decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Worse Survival in Co-Altered RAS-TP53 Patients With Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.\",\"authors\":\"Judy Li, Giacomo Waller, Yunyun Qin, Allen T Yu, Thomas Li, Deborah Li, Rami Srouji, Camilo Correa-Gallego, Spiros Hiotis, Ganesh Gunasekaran, Joshua Leinwand, Neha L Lad, James Oh Park, Noah A Cohen\",\"doi\":\"10.1245/s10434-025-18533-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Next-generation sequencing provides valuable information about mutations within colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) that impact survival. Existing data focus on prognostic implications of single gene mutations. This study assessed the impact of co-alterations on KRAS/NRAS and TP53 after CRLM resection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with CRLM who underwent surgical management and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed to assess associations with clinical outcomes. Groups were stratified by the presence or absence of RAS-TP53 co-alterations (RTC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort consisted of 155 patients with NGS data, with 42 patients (27%) harboring RTC. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The RTC patients had more right-side primary tumors (45% vs. 26%; P = 0.028), presented more frequently with synchronous CRLM (91% vs. 72%; P = 0.017), and were more often deemed initially unresectable (26% vs. 12%; P = 0.038). Medical and surgical management were comparable between the groups, with the majority of the patients receiving systemic therapy (97% overall) and undergoing wedge partial hepatectomies (59% overall). The RTC patients had worse recurrence-free and overall survival, and experienced extrahepatic recurrences sooner (median, 9 vs 14 months; P = 0.014). In the multivariate analyses, RTC (hazard ratio [HR, 2.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054-4.088; P = 0.035) and post-recurrence locoregional treatments (HR, 0.446; 95% CI 0.222-0.896; P = 0.023) were independently associated with survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The RTC patients presented more often with synchronous CRLM, and RTC also was associated with worse oncologic outcomes, suggestive of more aggressive tumor biology. Integration of genome-sequencing data beyond single gene mutations may provide important prognostic information for patients with CRLM to guide management decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8229,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Surgical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18533-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-18533-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新一代测序提供了影响生存的结直肠癌肝转移(crlm)突变的有价值信息。现有的数据集中在单基因突变的预后意义上。本研究评估了CRLM切除术后共改变对KRAS/NRAS和TP53的影响。方法:对接受手术治疗并进行新一代测序(NGS)的CRLM患者进行回顾性分析,以评估其与临床结果的关系。根据RAS-TP53共改变(RTC)的存在与否进行分组。结果:研究队列包括155例具有NGS数据的患者,其中42例(27%)患有RTC。两组的基线特征相似。RTC患者有更多的右侧原发肿瘤(45%比26%,P = 0.028),更频繁地出现同步CRLM(91%比72%,P = 0.017),更经常被认为最初不可切除(26%比12%,P = 0.038)。两组之间的医疗和手术治疗具有可比性,大多数患者接受了全身治疗(总体为97%),并接受了楔形部分肝切除术(总体为59%)。RTC患者无复发生存期和总生存期较差,肝外复发较早(中位9个月vs 14个月;P = 0.014)。在多因素分析中,RTC(风险比[HR, 2.076; 95%可信区间[CI], 1.054-4.088; P = 0.035)和复发后局部区域治疗(HR, 0.446; 95% CI 0.222-0.896; P = 0.023)与生存率独立相关。结论:RTC患者更常出现同步CRLM, RTC也与较差的肿瘤预后相关,提示肿瘤生物学更具侵袭性。整合除单基因突变外的基因组测序数据可能为CRLM患者提供重要的预后信息,以指导管理决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Worse Survival in Co-Altered RAS-TP53 Patients With Resected Colorectal Liver Metastases.

Background: Next-generation sequencing provides valuable information about mutations within colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) that impact survival. Existing data focus on prognostic implications of single gene mutations. This study assessed the impact of co-alterations on KRAS/NRAS and TP53 after CRLM resection.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed for patients with CRLM who underwent surgical management and had next-generation sequencing (NGS) performed to assess associations with clinical outcomes. Groups were stratified by the presence or absence of RAS-TP53 co-alterations (RTC).

Results: The study cohort consisted of 155 patients with NGS data, with 42 patients (27%) harboring RTC. The baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The RTC patients had more right-side primary tumors (45% vs. 26%; P = 0.028), presented more frequently with synchronous CRLM (91% vs. 72%; P = 0.017), and were more often deemed initially unresectable (26% vs. 12%; P = 0.038). Medical and surgical management were comparable between the groups, with the majority of the patients receiving systemic therapy (97% overall) and undergoing wedge partial hepatectomies (59% overall). The RTC patients had worse recurrence-free and overall survival, and experienced extrahepatic recurrences sooner (median, 9 vs 14 months; P = 0.014). In the multivariate analyses, RTC (hazard ratio [HR, 2.076; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.054-4.088; P = 0.035) and post-recurrence locoregional treatments (HR, 0.446; 95% CI 0.222-0.896; P = 0.023) were independently associated with survival.

Conclusions: The RTC patients presented more often with synchronous CRLM, and RTC also was associated with worse oncologic outcomes, suggestive of more aggressive tumor biology. Integration of genome-sequencing data beyond single gene mutations may provide important prognostic information for patients with CRLM to guide management decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信