环形和多焦人工晶状体的光功率完整性评价。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Hyeongju Han, Jae Woong Koh
{"title":"环形和多焦人工晶状体的光功率完整性评价。","authors":"Hyeongju Han, Jae Woong Koh","doi":"10.1186/s12886-025-04380-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implanting an intraocular lens (IOL) with an appropriate dioptric power is critical for achieving high-quality visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dioptric power may affect IOLs selection and compromise refractive accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between labeled and actual dioptric powers of commercially available toric and multifocal IOLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spherical and cylindrical powers of toric IOLs, and spherical and additive powers of multifocal IOLs, were measured via an optical bench system based on the magnification method. Measured values were assessed for compliance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 11979-2 tolerance limits via two one-sided t-tests(TOST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three toric IOLs satisfied the ISO tolerance criteria for both spherical and cylindrical power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.208 ± 0.170 D and 0.172 ± 0.206 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation across all toric measurements was 0.137 D. All four multifocal IOLs also met the ISO tolerance criteria for spherical and addition power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.069 ± 0.041 D and 0.045 ± 0.044 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation in the multifocal group was 0.057 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results confirm that both toric and multifocal IOLs comply with ISO standards for labeling accuracy. However, the greater variability observed in toric lenses highlights the importance of rotational alignment and precise manufacturing, which are critical for successful astigmatic correction.</p>","PeriodicalId":9058,"journal":{"name":"BMC Ophthalmology","volume":"25 1","pages":"565"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of optical power integrity in toric and multifocal intraocular lenses.\",\"authors\":\"Hyeongju Han, Jae Woong Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12886-025-04380-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Implanting an intraocular lens (IOL) with an appropriate dioptric power is critical for achieving high-quality visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dioptric power may affect IOLs selection and compromise refractive accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between labeled and actual dioptric powers of commercially available toric and multifocal IOLs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Spherical and cylindrical powers of toric IOLs, and spherical and additive powers of multifocal IOLs, were measured via an optical bench system based on the magnification method. Measured values were assessed for compliance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 11979-2 tolerance limits via two one-sided t-tests(TOST).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three toric IOLs satisfied the ISO tolerance criteria for both spherical and cylindrical power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.208 ± 0.170 D and 0.172 ± 0.206 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation across all toric measurements was 0.137 D. All four multifocal IOLs also met the ISO tolerance criteria for spherical and addition power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.069 ± 0.041 D and 0.045 ± 0.044 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation in the multifocal group was 0.057 D.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results confirm that both toric and multifocal IOLs comply with ISO standards for labeling accuracy. However, the greater variability observed in toric lenses highlights the importance of rotational alignment and precise manufacturing, which are critical for successful astigmatic correction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9058,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"565\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04380-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-025-04380-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:白内障手术后植入具有适当屈光度的人工晶状体(IOL)对于获得高质量的视力结果至关重要。标签屈光度和实际屈光度之间的差异可能会影响iol的选择和损害屈光精度。本研究旨在评估市售的环形和多焦iol的标记屈光度和实际屈光度之间的一致性。方法:采用基于放大倍率法的光学实验台系统,测量环型人工晶状体的球面和圆柱倍率,以及多焦型人工晶状体的球面和可加倍率。通过两个单侧t检验(TOST)评估测量值是否符合国际标准化组织(ISO) 11979-2公差限值。结果:三种环形人工晶状体均满足国际标准化组织的球形和圆柱形度数公差标准(p)。结论:这些结果证实了环形和多焦人工晶状体均符合国际标准化组织的标记精度标准。然而,在环面透镜观察到的更大的可变性突出了旋转对准和精确制造的重要性,这是成功的像散校正的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of optical power integrity in toric and multifocal intraocular lenses.

Background: Implanting an intraocular lens (IOL) with an appropriate dioptric power is critical for achieving high-quality visual outcomes after cataract surgery. Discrepancies between labeled and actual dioptric power may affect IOLs selection and compromise refractive accuracy. This study aimed to evaluate the agreement between labeled and actual dioptric powers of commercially available toric and multifocal IOLs.

Methods: Spherical and cylindrical powers of toric IOLs, and spherical and additive powers of multifocal IOLs, were measured via an optical bench system based on the magnification method. Measured values were assessed for compliance with International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 11979-2 tolerance limits via two one-sided t-tests(TOST).

Results: All three toric IOLs satisfied the ISO tolerance criteria for both spherical and cylindrical power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.208 ± 0.170 D and 0.172 ± 0.206 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation across all toric measurements was 0.137 D. All four multifocal IOLs also met the ISO tolerance criteria for spherical and addition power (p < 0.05), with errors of 0.069 ± 0.041 D and 0.045 ± 0.044 D, respectively. The average absolute deviation in the multifocal group was 0.057 D.

Conclusions: These results confirm that both toric and multifocal IOLs comply with ISO standards for labeling accuracy. However, the greater variability observed in toric lenses highlights the importance of rotational alignment and precise manufacturing, which are critical for successful astigmatic correction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Ophthalmology
BMC Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
441
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Ophthalmology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of eye disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信