72h粪便收集结合胆汁酸定量诊断和治疗率:回顾性分析。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
F Gelders, J Tack, T Vanuytsel
{"title":"72h粪便收集结合胆汁酸定量诊断和治疗率:回顾性分析。","authors":"F Gelders, J Tack, T Vanuytsel","doi":"10.51821/88.3.13758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Chronic idiopathic diarrhea represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to gastroenterologists. We aimed to explore the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72h stool collection combined with bile acid quantification, in chronic diarrhea patients, to differentiate bile acid malabsorption from other causes of diarrhea and thus enabling tailored treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study on 252 stool collections combined with bile acid quantification. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and ANOVA with post hoc between-group t-tests were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Idiopathic bile acid diarrhea was present in up to one third of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS and functional diarrhea. Steatorrhea was highly prevalent both in patients with a clinical suspicion of fat malabsorption (57%) as well as patients with non-specific diarrhea (23%). We show a significant difference in fecal bile acid and fat content in patients with vs. without predisposing risk factors for bile acid or fat malabsorption (e.g. cholecystectomy). The prevalence of steatorrhea was also significantly higher in patients with previous enteric resection or bariatric surgery. Bile acid diarrhea was significantly more frequent in patients with previous colonic resection, probably due to combined resection of a distal ileal segment during right hemicolectomy. We could not show higher rates of bile acid diarrhea post-cholecystectomy compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bile acid diarrhea and steatorrhea are prevalent findings in patients with chronic diarrhea. Using this 72h stool analysis with bile acid quantification can help clinicians in the complex management of chronic diarrhea.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"88 3","pages":"245-252"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72h stool collection combined with bile acid quantification: a retrospective analysis.\",\"authors\":\"F Gelders, J Tack, T Vanuytsel\",\"doi\":\"10.51821/88.3.13758\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and study aims: </strong>Chronic idiopathic diarrhea represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to gastroenterologists. We aimed to explore the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72h stool collection combined with bile acid quantification, in chronic diarrhea patients, to differentiate bile acid malabsorption from other causes of diarrhea and thus enabling tailored treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective study on 252 stool collections combined with bile acid quantification. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and ANOVA with post hoc between-group t-tests were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Idiopathic bile acid diarrhea was present in up to one third of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS and functional diarrhea. Steatorrhea was highly prevalent both in patients with a clinical suspicion of fat malabsorption (57%) as well as patients with non-specific diarrhea (23%). We show a significant difference in fecal bile acid and fat content in patients with vs. without predisposing risk factors for bile acid or fat malabsorption (e.g. cholecystectomy). The prevalence of steatorrhea was also significantly higher in patients with previous enteric resection or bariatric surgery. Bile acid diarrhea was significantly more frequent in patients with previous colonic resection, probably due to combined resection of a distal ileal segment during right hemicolectomy. We could not show higher rates of bile acid diarrhea post-cholecystectomy compared to the other groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bile acid diarrhea and steatorrhea are prevalent findings in patients with chronic diarrhea. Using this 72h stool analysis with bile acid quantification can help clinicians in the complex management of chronic diarrhea.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"88 3\",\"pages\":\"245-252\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.3.13758\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.3.13758","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和研究目的:慢性特发性腹泻对胃肠病学家来说是一个诊断和治疗的挑战。我们的目的是探讨72h粪便收集结合胆汁酸定量对慢性腹泻患者的诊断和治疗效果,以区分胆汁酸吸收不良与其他原因的腹泻,从而实现针对性的治疗。患者和方法:我们对252例粪便收集结合胆汁酸定量进行了回顾性研究。采用描述性统计、Pearson相关分析和方差分析及事后组间t检验。结果:特发性胆汁酸腹泻出现在多达三分之一的腹泻型IBS和功能性腹泻患者中。脂肪漏在临床怀疑脂肪吸收不良的患者(57%)和非特异性腹泻患者(23%)中都非常普遍。我们发现,有或没有胆汁酸或脂肪吸收不良易感危险因素(如胆囊切除术)的患者的粪便胆汁酸和脂肪含量有显著差异。既往肠切除术或减肥手术的患者脂肪溢的发生率也明显较高。胆汁酸性腹泻在先前结肠切除术的患者中更为常见,可能是由于在右半结肠切除术中联合切除了回肠远端段。我们没有发现胆囊切除术后胆汁酸腹泻的发生率比其他组高。结论:胆汁酸性腹泻和脂肪漏是慢性腹泻患者的常见表现。使用这种72小时粪便分析与胆汁酸定量可以帮助临床医生在慢性腹泻的复杂管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72h stool collection combined with bile acid quantification: a retrospective analysis.

Background and study aims: Chronic idiopathic diarrhea represents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to gastroenterologists. We aimed to explore the diagnostic and therapeutic yield of 72h stool collection combined with bile acid quantification, in chronic diarrhea patients, to differentiate bile acid malabsorption from other causes of diarrhea and thus enabling tailored treatment.

Patients and methods: We performed a retrospective study on 252 stool collections combined with bile acid quantification. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlation analysis and ANOVA with post hoc between-group t-tests were used.

Results: Idiopathic bile acid diarrhea was present in up to one third of patients with diarrhea-predominant IBS and functional diarrhea. Steatorrhea was highly prevalent both in patients with a clinical suspicion of fat malabsorption (57%) as well as patients with non-specific diarrhea (23%). We show a significant difference in fecal bile acid and fat content in patients with vs. without predisposing risk factors for bile acid or fat malabsorption (e.g. cholecystectomy). The prevalence of steatorrhea was also significantly higher in patients with previous enteric resection or bariatric surgery. Bile acid diarrhea was significantly more frequent in patients with previous colonic resection, probably due to combined resection of a distal ileal segment during right hemicolectomy. We could not show higher rates of bile acid diarrhea post-cholecystectomy compared to the other groups.

Conclusion: Bile acid diarrhea and steatorrhea are prevalent findings in patients with chronic diarrhea. Using this 72h stool analysis with bile acid quantification can help clinicians in the complex management of chronic diarrhea.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信