Atle Mysterud, Torkild Tveraa, Brage Bremset Hansen, Vegard Gundersen, Hans Tømmervik, Rasmus Erlandsson, Knut H. Røed, Jørn Våge, Roy Andersen, Einy Brænd, Siri Wølneberg Bøthun, Morten Elgaaen, Øystein Holand, Morten Kjørstad, Kjersti Kvie, Anders Mossing, Ingrid Sønsterud Myren, Manuela Panzacchi, Bart Peeters, Tor Punsvik, Lena Romtveit, Anna Skarin, Bram Van Moorter, Vebjørn Veiberg, Vemund Jaren, Olav Strand, Christer M. Rolandsen
{"title":"保护野生驯鹿的质量标准","authors":"Atle Mysterud, Torkild Tveraa, Brage Bremset Hansen, Vegard Gundersen, Hans Tømmervik, Rasmus Erlandsson, Knut H. Røed, Jørn Våge, Roy Andersen, Einy Brænd, Siri Wølneberg Bøthun, Morten Elgaaen, Øystein Holand, Morten Kjørstad, Kjersti Kvie, Anders Mossing, Ingrid Sønsterud Myren, Manuela Panzacchi, Bart Peeters, Tor Punsvik, Lena Romtveit, Anna Skarin, Bram Van Moorter, Vebjørn Veiberg, Vemund Jaren, Olav Strand, Christer M. Rolandsen","doi":"10.1002/wmon.70005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The ongoing biodiversity crisis requires policy tools to establish baselines and assess biodiversity status. Reindeer and caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) are iconic ungulates in the Arctic and subarctic, but populations are declining. Although the species is considered vulnerable globally in the International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] Red List, more detailed policy tools at the population level would allow for targeted conservation efforts nationally. We developed an environmental quality standard (or norm) for reindeer populations to evaluate their overall status and put complex variation and change into simple status categories (poor, medium, and good) based on sets of quantitative indicators for 1) population performance, genetic diversity, and health status; 2) available lichen resources; and 3) loss of seasonal habitat and connectivity. We implemented the environmental quality standard for 10 national and 14 smaller wild reindeer areas (populations) in Norway. Except for 1 area with good status, all others ranged from medium (<i>n</i> = 11) to poor quality (<i>n</i> = 12). More than half of the populations had medium (<i>n</i> = 7) or poor (<i>n</i> = 6) status for 1 or more population performance indicators, with negative trends in calf body mass and recruitment in several populations. High loss of genetic diversity gave poor status in 4 small and isolated populations, and 2 populations with chronic wasting disease scored poor on health status. The status of lichen resources was medium (<i>n</i> = 20) or good (<i>n</i> = 3), with 1 exception. However, lichen time series data were not available to evaluate temporal trends to assess overgrazing. Loss of connectivity (poor; <i>n</i> = 7) was more problematic than loss of seasonal habitat (<i>n</i> = 3). The poor availability of high-quality empirical data, particularly on population performance, has limited the ability to fully assess the conservation status of several small populations. The environmental quality standard provides an important step towards operationalizing management and aiding in securing the long-term conservation of wild reindeer. We discuss further improvements and the potential usefulness of this approach for other large mammals.</p>","PeriodicalId":235,"journal":{"name":"Wildlife Monographs","volume":"219 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A quality standard for conservation of wild reindeer\",\"authors\":\"Atle Mysterud, Torkild Tveraa, Brage Bremset Hansen, Vegard Gundersen, Hans Tømmervik, Rasmus Erlandsson, Knut H. Røed, Jørn Våge, Roy Andersen, Einy Brænd, Siri Wølneberg Bøthun, Morten Elgaaen, Øystein Holand, Morten Kjørstad, Kjersti Kvie, Anders Mossing, Ingrid Sønsterud Myren, Manuela Panzacchi, Bart Peeters, Tor Punsvik, Lena Romtveit, Anna Skarin, Bram Van Moorter, Vebjørn Veiberg, Vemund Jaren, Olav Strand, Christer M. Rolandsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/wmon.70005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The ongoing biodiversity crisis requires policy tools to establish baselines and assess biodiversity status. Reindeer and caribou (<i>Rangifer tarandus</i>) are iconic ungulates in the Arctic and subarctic, but populations are declining. Although the species is considered vulnerable globally in the International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] Red List, more detailed policy tools at the population level would allow for targeted conservation efforts nationally. We developed an environmental quality standard (or norm) for reindeer populations to evaluate their overall status and put complex variation and change into simple status categories (poor, medium, and good) based on sets of quantitative indicators for 1) population performance, genetic diversity, and health status; 2) available lichen resources; and 3) loss of seasonal habitat and connectivity. We implemented the environmental quality standard for 10 national and 14 smaller wild reindeer areas (populations) in Norway. Except for 1 area with good status, all others ranged from medium (<i>n</i> = 11) to poor quality (<i>n</i> = 12). More than half of the populations had medium (<i>n</i> = 7) or poor (<i>n</i> = 6) status for 1 or more population performance indicators, with negative trends in calf body mass and recruitment in several populations. High loss of genetic diversity gave poor status in 4 small and isolated populations, and 2 populations with chronic wasting disease scored poor on health status. The status of lichen resources was medium (<i>n</i> = 20) or good (<i>n</i> = 3), with 1 exception. However, lichen time series data were not available to evaluate temporal trends to assess overgrazing. Loss of connectivity (poor; <i>n</i> = 7) was more problematic than loss of seasonal habitat (<i>n</i> = 3). The poor availability of high-quality empirical data, particularly on population performance, has limited the ability to fully assess the conservation status of several small populations. The environmental quality standard provides an important step towards operationalizing management and aiding in securing the long-term conservation of wild reindeer. We discuss further improvements and the potential usefulness of this approach for other large mammals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wildlife Monographs\",\"volume\":\"219 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wildlife Monographs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.70005\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wildlife Monographs","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://wildlife.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/wmon.70005","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
A quality standard for conservation of wild reindeer
The ongoing biodiversity crisis requires policy tools to establish baselines and assess biodiversity status. Reindeer and caribou (Rangifer tarandus) are iconic ungulates in the Arctic and subarctic, but populations are declining. Although the species is considered vulnerable globally in the International Union for Conservation of Nature [IUCN] Red List, more detailed policy tools at the population level would allow for targeted conservation efforts nationally. We developed an environmental quality standard (or norm) for reindeer populations to evaluate their overall status and put complex variation and change into simple status categories (poor, medium, and good) based on sets of quantitative indicators for 1) population performance, genetic diversity, and health status; 2) available lichen resources; and 3) loss of seasonal habitat and connectivity. We implemented the environmental quality standard for 10 national and 14 smaller wild reindeer areas (populations) in Norway. Except for 1 area with good status, all others ranged from medium (n = 11) to poor quality (n = 12). More than half of the populations had medium (n = 7) or poor (n = 6) status for 1 or more population performance indicators, with negative trends in calf body mass and recruitment in several populations. High loss of genetic diversity gave poor status in 4 small and isolated populations, and 2 populations with chronic wasting disease scored poor on health status. The status of lichen resources was medium (n = 20) or good (n = 3), with 1 exception. However, lichen time series data were not available to evaluate temporal trends to assess overgrazing. Loss of connectivity (poor; n = 7) was more problematic than loss of seasonal habitat (n = 3). The poor availability of high-quality empirical data, particularly on population performance, has limited the ability to fully assess the conservation status of several small populations. The environmental quality standard provides an important step towards operationalizing management and aiding in securing the long-term conservation of wild reindeer. We discuss further improvements and the potential usefulness of this approach for other large mammals.