Sobhan Neyrizi , Keimpe Nevenzeel , Dirk J. Groenendijk , Ben in ‘t Veen , Jack Ledingham , Paul J. Corbett
{"title":"利用电化学膜分离评估锂回收:成本分析和设计策略","authors":"Sobhan Neyrizi , Keimpe Nevenzeel , Dirk J. Groenendijk , Ben in ‘t Veen , Jack Ledingham , Paul J. Corbett","doi":"10.1039/d5gc03414k","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The increasing demand for Li-based chemicals necessitates advancements in sustainable recovery technologies. Ion-exchange membranes, such as Li superionic conductors, offer promising electrochemical solutions. However, the relationship between electrochemical fundamentals and techno-economic feasibility remains underexplored. This analysis presents a techno-economic evaluation of an integrated Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> production process, covering brine intake and pretreatment, direct electrochemical Li recovery, brine disposal, and LiCl conversion to battery-grade Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. We develop an optimization method that accounts for variations in brine composition (Li: 0.17–710 ppm) and Li-selective membrane prices ($500–$40 000 per m<sup>2</sup>) to establish stack design and operational guidelines to minimize energy and material consumption in producing 1 ton of Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> per day. We examine Li/Ca and Li/Mg selectivity, stack pressure drop limits, and operation at reduced recovery ratios. While a 20-bar pressure threshold is identified as optimal for cost savings, we highlight an alternative strategy – combining lower recovery ratios with adaptive electrochemical design – to further minimize costs without requiring higher pressure tolerance. While Li recovery from seawater remains costly, our findings indicate that for other brine sources, assuming a Li transference number of 1, production costs range from $2600 to $28 000 per ton of Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, with energy consumption varying from 5099 to 71 099 kWh, depending on Li concentration and membrane price. However, energy demand can increase by 170% to over 900% at lower binary selectivities of ∼22 to ∼5, primarily due to higher current density and voltage requirements. Our work provides guidelines on an efficient direct Li recovery from brines, paving the way to a more sustainable Li sourcing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":78,"journal":{"name":"Green Chemistry","volume":"27 40","pages":"Pages 12694-12714"},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating lithium recovery using electrochemical membrane separation: cost analysis and design strategies\",\"authors\":\"Sobhan Neyrizi , Keimpe Nevenzeel , Dirk J. Groenendijk , Ben in ‘t Veen , Jack Ledingham , Paul J. Corbett\",\"doi\":\"10.1039/d5gc03414k\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The increasing demand for Li-based chemicals necessitates advancements in sustainable recovery technologies. Ion-exchange membranes, such as Li superionic conductors, offer promising electrochemical solutions. However, the relationship between electrochemical fundamentals and techno-economic feasibility remains underexplored. This analysis presents a techno-economic evaluation of an integrated Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> production process, covering brine intake and pretreatment, direct electrochemical Li recovery, brine disposal, and LiCl conversion to battery-grade Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>. We develop an optimization method that accounts for variations in brine composition (Li: 0.17–710 ppm) and Li-selective membrane prices ($500–$40 000 per m<sup>2</sup>) to establish stack design and operational guidelines to minimize energy and material consumption in producing 1 ton of Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub> per day. We examine Li/Ca and Li/Mg selectivity, stack pressure drop limits, and operation at reduced recovery ratios. While a 20-bar pressure threshold is identified as optimal for cost savings, we highlight an alternative strategy – combining lower recovery ratios with adaptive electrochemical design – to further minimize costs without requiring higher pressure tolerance. While Li recovery from seawater remains costly, our findings indicate that for other brine sources, assuming a Li transference number of 1, production costs range from $2600 to $28 000 per ton of Li<sub>2</sub>CO<sub>3</sub>, with energy consumption varying from 5099 to 71 099 kWh, depending on Li concentration and membrane price. However, energy demand can increase by 170% to over 900% at lower binary selectivities of ∼22 to ∼5, primarily due to higher current density and voltage requirements. Our work provides guidelines on an efficient direct Li recovery from brines, paving the way to a more sustainable Li sourcing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":78,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"27 40\",\"pages\":\"Pages 12694-12714\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Green Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926225008398\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Green Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S1463926225008398","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating lithium recovery using electrochemical membrane separation: cost analysis and design strategies
The increasing demand for Li-based chemicals necessitates advancements in sustainable recovery technologies. Ion-exchange membranes, such as Li superionic conductors, offer promising electrochemical solutions. However, the relationship between electrochemical fundamentals and techno-economic feasibility remains underexplored. This analysis presents a techno-economic evaluation of an integrated Li2CO3 production process, covering brine intake and pretreatment, direct electrochemical Li recovery, brine disposal, and LiCl conversion to battery-grade Li2CO3. We develop an optimization method that accounts for variations in brine composition (Li: 0.17–710 ppm) and Li-selective membrane prices ($500–$40 000 per m2) to establish stack design and operational guidelines to minimize energy and material consumption in producing 1 ton of Li2CO3 per day. We examine Li/Ca and Li/Mg selectivity, stack pressure drop limits, and operation at reduced recovery ratios. While a 20-bar pressure threshold is identified as optimal for cost savings, we highlight an alternative strategy – combining lower recovery ratios with adaptive electrochemical design – to further minimize costs without requiring higher pressure tolerance. While Li recovery from seawater remains costly, our findings indicate that for other brine sources, assuming a Li transference number of 1, production costs range from $2600 to $28 000 per ton of Li2CO3, with energy consumption varying from 5099 to 71 099 kWh, depending on Li concentration and membrane price. However, energy demand can increase by 170% to over 900% at lower binary selectivities of ∼22 to ∼5, primarily due to higher current density and voltage requirements. Our work provides guidelines on an efficient direct Li recovery from brines, paving the way to a more sustainable Li sourcing.
期刊介绍:
Green Chemistry is a journal that provides a unique forum for the publication of innovative research on the development of alternative green and sustainable technologies. The scope of Green Chemistry is based on the definition proposed by Anastas and Warner (Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, P T Anastas and J C Warner, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1998), which defines green chemistry as the utilisation of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products. Green Chemistry aims to reduce the environmental impact of the chemical enterprise by developing a technology base that is inherently non-toxic to living things and the environment. The journal welcomes submissions on all aspects of research relating to this endeavor and publishes original and significant cutting-edge research that is likely to be of wide general appeal. For a work to be published, it must present a significant advance in green chemistry, including a comparison with existing methods and a demonstration of advantages over those methods.