Debora Casoli, Marco Visentin, Annamaria Tuan, Giuseppe Cappiello
{"title":"管理思想的力量:围绕关心的责任重新定位组织,以更好地应对重大挑战","authors":"Debora Casoli, Marco Visentin, Annamaria Tuan, Giuseppe Cappiello","doi":"10.1111/ijmr.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present article presents an integrative review related to stewardship in all the business and management disciplines, from its initial development in 1980 to the present. Specifically, we applied a latent Dirichlet allocation‐based topic modelling analysis to almost 1200 articles, seeking to creatively synthesize the concept of stewardship around the two recurring building blocks of the psychological contract defined in the literature: the duty to care and the related psychological currencies. From this foundation, we propose the novel concept of the <jats:italic>stewardship mind</jats:italic>: a way of thinking characterized by the intention to be credible and consistent in fulfilling a duty to care of something of value, motivated by a certain degree of ideological currency. We articulate this concept further by providing a taxonomy of stewardship minds, ranging from mainly instrumental to mainly ideological. This taxonomy may help inspire managers to integrate stewardship into their daily actions and communications. In fact, we advance that a genuine stewardship mind has the most potential to tackle grand societal and environmental challenges. We also discuss an array of avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":48326,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Management Reviews","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The power of a stewardship mind: Reorienting organizations around the duty to care to better address grand challenges\",\"authors\":\"Debora Casoli, Marco Visentin, Annamaria Tuan, Giuseppe Cappiello\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ijmr.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present article presents an integrative review related to stewardship in all the business and management disciplines, from its initial development in 1980 to the present. Specifically, we applied a latent Dirichlet allocation‐based topic modelling analysis to almost 1200 articles, seeking to creatively synthesize the concept of stewardship around the two recurring building blocks of the psychological contract defined in the literature: the duty to care and the related psychological currencies. From this foundation, we propose the novel concept of the <jats:italic>stewardship mind</jats:italic>: a way of thinking characterized by the intention to be credible and consistent in fulfilling a duty to care of something of value, motivated by a certain degree of ideological currency. We articulate this concept further by providing a taxonomy of stewardship minds, ranging from mainly instrumental to mainly ideological. This taxonomy may help inspire managers to integrate stewardship into their daily actions and communications. In fact, we advance that a genuine stewardship mind has the most potential to tackle grand societal and environmental challenges. We also discuss an array of avenues for future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Management Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70006\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Management Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.70006","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The power of a stewardship mind: Reorienting organizations around the duty to care to better address grand challenges
The present article presents an integrative review related to stewardship in all the business and management disciplines, from its initial development in 1980 to the present. Specifically, we applied a latent Dirichlet allocation‐based topic modelling analysis to almost 1200 articles, seeking to creatively synthesize the concept of stewardship around the two recurring building blocks of the psychological contract defined in the literature: the duty to care and the related psychological currencies. From this foundation, we propose the novel concept of the stewardship mind: a way of thinking characterized by the intention to be credible and consistent in fulfilling a duty to care of something of value, motivated by a certain degree of ideological currency. We articulate this concept further by providing a taxonomy of stewardship minds, ranging from mainly instrumental to mainly ideological. This taxonomy may help inspire managers to integrate stewardship into their daily actions and communications. In fact, we advance that a genuine stewardship mind has the most potential to tackle grand societal and environmental challenges. We also discuss an array of avenues for future research.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Management Reviews (IJMR) stands as the premier global review journal in Organisation and Management Studies (OMS). Its published papers aim to provide substantial conceptual contributions, acting as a strategic platform for new research directions. IJMR plays a pivotal role in influencing how OMS scholars conceptualize research in their respective fields. The journal's reviews critically assess the state of knowledge in specific fields, appraising the conceptual foundations of competing paradigms to advance current and future research in the area.