文化响应型人工智能:将Hofstede的文化模型整合到人工智能驱动的ESG战略中

IF 13.3 1区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Andrea Appolloni, Debarun Chakraborty, Ravi Kumar Jain
{"title":"文化响应型人工智能:将Hofstede的文化模型整合到人工智能驱动的ESG战略中","authors":"Andrea Appolloni, Debarun Chakraborty, Ravi Kumar Jain","doi":"10.1002/bse.70248","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates how Hofstede's cultural dimensions impact the application of AI technology in fulfilling Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) objectives by concentrating on organizational attitude and policy as moderating factors. The framework formulated using cultural theory attempts to explain the influence that power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism have on the application of AI to various sociocultural settings. This study used a sequential exploratory mixed‐methods design involving qualitative grounded theory and in‐depth interviews with stakeholders and key informants from different domains to identify culturally relevant constructs pertaining to AI use for ESG objectives in the exploratory phase. In the confirmatory phase, the relationships formulated in the previous step were tested using PLS‐SEM with survey data from 448 respondents in India, processed with SMART PLS 4.0, ensuring the results met the various PLS‐SEM validity criteria of reliability, validity, and theoretical rigor. It is noted that positive organizational attitudes increase the effects of AI on ESG outcomes, while formal policies, save for a few, do not exert any meaningful moderating influence because they are too rigid and lack context. This research contributes to culture theory by illustrating the intersections of AI adoption and ESG performance, which are relatively under‐discussed in modern academic research. Addressing this gap highlights the inadequacy of culturally sensitive attitude‐centered frameworks tailored for responsible organizational leadership shaped by sustainable ethical guiding global principles.","PeriodicalId":9518,"journal":{"name":"Business Strategy and The Environment","volume":"76 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Culturally Responsive AI: Integrating Hofstede's Cultural Model in AI‐Driven ESG Strategies\",\"authors\":\"Andrea Appolloni, Debarun Chakraborty, Ravi Kumar Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/bse.70248\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research investigates how Hofstede's cultural dimensions impact the application of AI technology in fulfilling Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) objectives by concentrating on organizational attitude and policy as moderating factors. The framework formulated using cultural theory attempts to explain the influence that power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism have on the application of AI to various sociocultural settings. This study used a sequential exploratory mixed‐methods design involving qualitative grounded theory and in‐depth interviews with stakeholders and key informants from different domains to identify culturally relevant constructs pertaining to AI use for ESG objectives in the exploratory phase. In the confirmatory phase, the relationships formulated in the previous step were tested using PLS‐SEM with survey data from 448 respondents in India, processed with SMART PLS 4.0, ensuring the results met the various PLS‐SEM validity criteria of reliability, validity, and theoretical rigor. It is noted that positive organizational attitudes increase the effects of AI on ESG outcomes, while formal policies, save for a few, do not exert any meaningful moderating influence because they are too rigid and lack context. This research contributes to culture theory by illustrating the intersections of AI adoption and ESG performance, which are relatively under‐discussed in modern academic research. Addressing this gap highlights the inadequacy of culturally sensitive attitude‐centered frameworks tailored for responsible organizational leadership shaped by sustainable ethical guiding global principles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"volume\":\"76 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Business Strategy and The Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70248\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business Strategy and The Environment","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.70248","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过关注组织态度和政策作为调节因素,探讨Hofstede的文化维度如何影响人工智能技术在实现环境、社会和治理(ESG)目标中的应用。利用文化理论制定的框架试图解释权力距离、不确定性规避和个人主义对人工智能在各种社会文化环境中的应用的影响。本研究采用了顺序探索性混合方法设计,包括定性基础理论和对来自不同领域的利益相关者和关键信息提供者的深度访谈,以确定在探索阶段与人工智能用于ESG目标相关的文化相关结构。在验证阶段,利用来自印度448名受访者的调查数据,使用PLS‐SEM对前一步中制定的关系进行了测试,并使用SMART PLS 4.0进行了处理,确保结果符合各种PLS‐SEM效度标准,包括可靠性、效度和理论严谨性。值得注意的是,积极的组织态度增加了人工智能对ESG成果的影响,而正式政策(除少数外)没有发挥任何有意义的调节作用,因为它们过于僵化,缺乏背景。本研究通过说明人工智能采用与ESG绩效之间的交叉关系,为文化理论做出了贡献,这在现代学术研究中相对较少讨论。解决这一差距凸显了为负责任的组织领导量身定制的以文化敏感态度为中心的框架的不足,这些框架由可持续的道德指导全球原则塑造。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Culturally Responsive AI: Integrating Hofstede's Cultural Model in AI‐Driven ESG Strategies
This research investigates how Hofstede's cultural dimensions impact the application of AI technology in fulfilling Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) objectives by concentrating on organizational attitude and policy as moderating factors. The framework formulated using cultural theory attempts to explain the influence that power distance, uncertainty avoidance, and individualism have on the application of AI to various sociocultural settings. This study used a sequential exploratory mixed‐methods design involving qualitative grounded theory and in‐depth interviews with stakeholders and key informants from different domains to identify culturally relevant constructs pertaining to AI use for ESG objectives in the exploratory phase. In the confirmatory phase, the relationships formulated in the previous step were tested using PLS‐SEM with survey data from 448 respondents in India, processed with SMART PLS 4.0, ensuring the results met the various PLS‐SEM validity criteria of reliability, validity, and theoretical rigor. It is noted that positive organizational attitudes increase the effects of AI on ESG outcomes, while formal policies, save for a few, do not exert any meaningful moderating influence because they are too rigid and lack context. This research contributes to culture theory by illustrating the intersections of AI adoption and ESG performance, which are relatively under‐discussed in modern academic research. Addressing this gap highlights the inadequacy of culturally sensitive attitude‐centered frameworks tailored for responsible organizational leadership shaped by sustainable ethical guiding global principles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
22.50
自引率
19.40%
发文量
336
期刊介绍: Business Strategy and the Environment (BSE) is a leading academic journal focused on business strategies for improving the natural environment. It publishes peer-reviewed research on various topics such as systems and standards, environmental performance, disclosure, eco-innovation, corporate environmental management tools, organizations and management, supply chains, circular economy, governance, green finance, industry sectors, and responses to climate change and other contemporary environmental issues. The journal aims to provide original contributions that enhance the understanding of sustainability in business. Its target audience includes academics, practitioners, business managers, and consultants. However, BSE does not accept papers on corporate social responsibility (CSR), as this topic is covered by its sibling journal Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management. The journal is indexed in several databases and collections such as ABI/INFORM Collection, Agricultural & Environmental Science Database, BIOBASE, Emerald Management Reviews, GeoArchive, Environment Index, GEOBASE, INSPEC, Technology Collection, and Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信